Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Calcified Tissue International 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Research

Developing Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Multivariate Fracture Risk Prediction Algorithms

Authors: Ernest K. Poku, Mark R. Towler, Niamh M. Cummins, Jeff D. Newman

Published in: Calcified Tissue International | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Multivariate prediction algorithms such as FRAX® and QFractureScores provide an opportunity for new prognostic biomarkers to be developed and incorporated, potentially leading to better fracture prediction. As more research is conducted into these novel biomarkers, a number of factors need to be considered for their successful development for inclusion in these algorithms. In this review, we describe two well-known multivariate prediction algorithms for osteoporosis fracture risk applicable to the UK population, FRAX and QFractureScores, and comment on the current prognostic tools available for fracture risk; dual X-ray assessment, quantitative ultrasonography, and genomic/biochemical markers. We also highlight the factors that need to be considered in the development of new biomarkers. These factors include the requirement for prospective data, collected in new cohort studies or using archived samples; the need for adequate stability data to be provided; and the need for appropriate storage methods to be used when retrospective data are required. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve measures have been found to have limited utility in assessing the impact of the addition of new risk factors on the predictive performance of multivariate algorithms. New performance evaluation measures, such as net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement, are increasingly important in the evaluation of the impact of the addition of new markers to multivariate algorithms, and these are also discussed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:77–83PubMedCrossRef McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:77–83PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cook NR (2007) Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115:928–935PubMedCrossRef Cook NR (2007) Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115:928–935PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475PubMedCrossRef Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1650PubMedCrossRef Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1650PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kanis J (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. World Health Organization, Lyon Kanis J (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. World Health Organization, Lyon
8.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX® and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX® and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229–238PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229–238PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528PubMedCrossRef Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20:1675–1682PubMedCrossRef Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20:1675–1682PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Garton MJ, Cooper C, Reid D (1997) Perimenopausal bone density screening—Will it help prevent osteoporosis? Maturitas 26:35–43PubMedCrossRef Garton MJ, Cooper C, Reid D (1997) Perimenopausal bone density screening—Will it help prevent osteoporosis? Maturitas 26:35–43PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM (2010) Population screening for osteoporosis risk: a randomised control trial of medication use and fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 21:561–568PubMedCrossRef Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM (2010) Population screening for osteoporosis risk: a randomised control trial of medication use and fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 21:561–568PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:1291–1295CrossRef Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:1291–1295CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Collins GS, Mallett S, Altman DG (2011) Predicting risk of osteoporotic and hip fracture in the United Kingdom: prospective independent and external validation of QFractureScores. BMJ (in press) Collins GS, Mallett S, Altman DG (2011) Predicting risk of osteoporotic and hip fracture in the United Kingdom: prospective independent and external validation of QFractureScores. BMJ (in press)
17.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ (in press) Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ (in press)
18.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2012) Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 23:423–431PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2012) Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 23:423–431PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cummins NM, Poku EK, Towler MR, O’Driscoll OM, Ralston SH (2011) Clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores. Calcif Tissue Int 89:172–177PubMedCrossRef Cummins NM, Poku EK, Towler MR, O’Driscoll OM, Ralston SH (2011) Clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores. Calcif Tissue Int 89:172–177PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg MA, La Croix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott AM, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts NB, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg MA, La Croix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott AM, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts NB, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schousboe JT (2008) Cost effectiveness of screen-and-treat strategies for low bone mineral density: How do we screen, who do we screen and who do we treat? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 6:1–18PubMedCrossRef Schousboe JT (2008) Cost effectiveness of screen-and-treat strategies for low bone mineral density: How do we screen, who do we screen and who do we treat? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 6:1–18PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stewart A, Kumar V, Reid DM (2006) Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 21:413–418PubMedCrossRef Stewart A, Kumar V, Reid DM (2006) Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 21:413–418PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hans D, Krieg MA (2009) Quantitative ultrasound for the detection and management of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex 51(suppl 1):S25–S37PubMedCrossRef Hans D, Krieg MA (2009) Quantitative ultrasound for the detection and management of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex 51(suppl 1):S25–S37PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634PubMedCrossRef Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Langton CM, Langton DK (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. Br J Radiol 73:31–35PubMed Langton CM, Langton DK (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. Br J Radiol 73:31–35PubMed
26.
go back to reference Zhu K, Devine A, Prince RL (2009) Quantitative ultrasound measurements predict fracture in older women: a 10-year longitudinal study. Bone 44:S118CrossRef Zhu K, Devine A, Prince RL (2009) Quantitative ultrasound measurements predict fracture in older women: a 10-year longitudinal study. Bone 44:S118CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moayyeri A, Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Bingham S, Luben RN, Wareham NJ, Reeve J, Khaw KT (2009) Is QUS or DXA better for predicting the 10-year absolute risk of fracture? J Bone Miner Res 24:1319–1325PubMedCrossRef Moayyeri A, Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Bingham S, Luben RN, Wareham NJ, Reeve J, Khaw KT (2009) Is QUS or DXA better for predicting the 10-year absolute risk of fracture? J Bone Miner Res 24:1319–1325PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Garnero P, Hausherr E, Chapuy M-, Marcelli C, Grandjean H, Muller C, Cormier C, Bréart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (1996) Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1531–1538PubMedCrossRef Garnero P, Hausherr E, Chapuy M-, Marcelli C, Grandjean H, Muller C, Cormier C, Bréart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (1996) Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1531–1538PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A, McClung M, Morris HA, Silverman S, Trenti T, Wahl DA, Cooper C, Kanis JA (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420PubMedCrossRef Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A, McClung M, Morris HA, Silverman S, Trenti T, Wahl DA, Cooper C, Kanis JA (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD (1996) Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 11:337–349PubMedCrossRef Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD (1996) Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 11:337–349PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Arden NK, Baker J, Hogg C, Baan K, Spector TD (1996) The heritability of bone mineral density, ultrasound of the calcaneus and hip axis length: a study of postmenopausal twins. J Bone Miner Res 11:530–534PubMedCrossRef Arden NK, Baker J, Hogg C, Baan K, Spector TD (1996) The heritability of bone mineral density, ultrasound of the calcaneus and hip axis length: a study of postmenopausal twins. J Bone Miner Res 11:530–534PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mann V, Ralston SH (2003) Meta-analysis of COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture. Bone 32:711–717PubMedCrossRef Mann V, Ralston SH (2003) Meta-analysis of COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture. Bone 32:711–717PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Navarro MC, Sosa M, Del Pino-Montes J, Torres A, Salido E, Saavedra P, Corral-Gudino L, Montilla CA (2007) Collagen type 1 (COL1A1) Sp1 binding site polymorphisms is associated with osteoporotic fractures but not with bone density in post-menopausal women from the Canary Islands: a preliminary study. Aging Clin Exp Res 19:4–9PubMed Navarro MC, Sosa M, Del Pino-Montes J, Torres A, Salido E, Saavedra P, Corral-Gudino L, Montilla CA (2007) Collagen type 1 (COL1A1) Sp1 binding site polymorphisms is associated with osteoporotic fractures but not with bone density in post-menopausal women from the Canary Islands: a preliminary study. Aging Clin Exp Res 19:4–9PubMed
35.
go back to reference Klee EW, Hoppman-Chaney NL, Ferber MJ (2011) Expanding DNA diagnostic panel testing: Is more better? Exp Rev Mol Diagn 11:703–709CrossRef Klee EW, Hoppman-Chaney NL, Ferber MJ (2011) Expanding DNA diagnostic panel testing: Is more better? Exp Rev Mol Diagn 11:703–709CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brown MA (2005) Genetic studies of osteoporosis—a rethink required. Calcif Tissue Int 76:319–325PubMedCrossRef Brown MA (2005) Genetic studies of osteoporosis—a rethink required. Calcif Tissue Int 76:319–325PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Barr R, Macdonald H, Stewart A, McGuigan F, Rogers A, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Glüer C, Roux C, Reid DM (2010) Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, falls, balance and muscle power: results from two independent studies (APOSS and OPUS). Osteoporos Int 21:457–466PubMedCrossRef Barr R, Macdonald H, Stewart A, McGuigan F, Rogers A, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Glüer C, Roux C, Reid DM (2010) Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, falls, balance and muscle power: results from two independent studies (APOSS and OPUS). Osteoporos Int 21:457–466PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Robbins JA, Schott AM, Garnero P, Delmas PD, Hans D, Meunier PJ (2005) Risk factors for hip fracture in women with high BMD: EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int 16:149–154PubMedCrossRef Robbins JA, Schott AM, Garnero P, Delmas PD, Hans D, Meunier PJ (2005) Risk factors for hip fracture in women with high BMD: EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int 16:149–154PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Shepstone L, Fordham R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Heawood A, Peters TJ, O’Neill T, Torgerson D, Holland R, Howe A, Marshall T, Kanis JA, McCloskey E (2012) A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int (in press) Shepstone L, Fordham R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Heawood A, Peters TJ, O’Neill T, Torgerson D, Holland R, Howe A, Marshall T, Kanis JA, McCloskey E (2012) A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int (in press)
40.
go back to reference Elliott P, Peakman TC (2008) The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int J Epidemiol 37:234–244PubMedCrossRef Elliott P, Peakman TC (2008) The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int J Epidemiol 37:234–244PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Patel R, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007) Evaluation of osteoporosis using skin thickness measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 81:442–449PubMedCrossRef Patel R, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007) Evaluation of osteoporosis using skin thickness measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 81:442–449PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Saito M, Marumo K (2010) Collagen cross-links as a determinant of bone quality: a possible explanation for bone fragility in aging, osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus. Osteoporos Int 21:195–214PubMedCrossRef Saito M, Marumo K (2010) Collagen cross-links as a determinant of bone quality: a possible explanation for bone fragility in aging, osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus. Osteoporos Int 21:195–214PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Langholz B, Thomas DC (1990) Nested case-control and case-cohort methods of sampling from a cohort: a critical comparison. Am J Epidemiol 131:169–176PubMed Langholz B, Thomas DC (1990) Nested case-control and case-cohort methods of sampling from a cohort: a critical comparison. Am J Epidemiol 131:169–176PubMed
44.
go back to reference Kenis G, Teunissen C, De Jongh R, Bosmans E, Steinbusch H, Maes M (2002) Stability of interleukin 6, soluble interleukin 6 receptor, interleukin 10 and CC16 in human serum. Cytokine 19:228–235PubMed Kenis G, Teunissen C, De Jongh R, Bosmans E, Steinbusch H, Maes M (2002) Stability of interleukin 6, soluble interleukin 6 receptor, interleukin 10 and CC16 in human serum. Cytokine 19:228–235PubMed
46.
go back to reference Cook NR (2008) Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 54:17–23PubMedCrossRef Cook NR (2008) Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 54:17–23PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Rapsomaniki E, White IR, Wood AM, Thompson SG, Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2012) A framework for quantifying net benefits of alternative prognostic models. Stat Med 31:114–130PubMedCrossRef Rapsomaniki E, White IR, Wood AM, Thompson SG, Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2012) A framework for quantifying net benefits of alternative prognostic models. Stat Med 31:114–130PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making 26:565–574PubMedCrossRef Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making 26:565–574PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Pepe MS, Feng Z, Gu JW (2008) Comments on “Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond,” by M. J. Pencina et al. Stat Med. 27:173–181. doi:10.1002/sim.2929 Pepe MS, Feng Z, Gu JW (2008) Comments on “Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond,” by M. J. Pencina et al. Stat Med. 27:173–181. doi:10.​1002/​sim.​2929
50.
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, D’Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, D’Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K (2007) Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 18:1481–1491PubMedCrossRef Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K (2007) Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 18:1481–1491PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW (2011) Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30:11–21PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW (2011) Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30:11–21PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Donaldson MG, Cawthon PM, Schousboe JT, Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Taylor BC, Hochberg MC, Bauer DC, Cummings SR, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) (2011) Novel methods to evaluate fracture risk models. J Bone Miner Res 26:1767–1773PubMedCrossRef Donaldson MG, Cawthon PM, Schousboe JT, Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Taylor BC, Hochberg MC, Bauer DC, Cummings SR, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) (2011) Novel methods to evaluate fracture risk models. J Bone Miner Res 26:1767–1773PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Multivariate Fracture Risk Prediction Algorithms
Authors
Ernest K. Poku
Mark R. Towler
Niamh M. Cummins
Jeff D. Newman
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Calcified Tissue International / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0171-967X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-012-9627-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Calcified Tissue International 3/2012 Go to the issue