Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and fracture risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Authors: Y. S. Zhang, W. Y. Weng, B. C. Xie, Y. Meng, Y. H. Hao, Y. M. Liang, Z. K. Zhou

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Our network meta-analysis analyzed the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on fracture risk. By combining data from randomized controlled trials, we found that GLP-1 RAs were associated with a decreased bone fracture risk, and exenatide is the best option agent with regard to the risk of fracture. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018094433).

Introduction

Data on the effects of GLP-1 RAs on fracture risk are conflicted. This study aimed to analyze the available evidence on the effects of GLP-1 RAs on fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for relevant published articles, and unpublished studies presented at ClinicalTrials.​gov were searched for relevant clinical data. All analyses were performed with STATA 12.0 and R software (Version 3.4.4). We estimated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by combining RRs for fracture effects of included trials.

Results

There were 54 eligible random control trials (RCTs) with 49,602 participants, including 28,353 patients treated with GLP-1 RAs. Relative to placebo, exenatide (RR, 0.17; 95% CI 0.03–0.67) was associated with lowest risk of fracture among other GLP-1 RAs. Exenatide had the highest probability to be the safest option with regard to the risk of fracture (0.07 ‰), followed by dulaglutide (1.04%), liraglutide (1.39%), albiglutide (5.61%), lixisenatide (8.07%), and semaglutide (18.72%). A statistically significant inconsistency was observed in some comparisons.

Conclusion

The Bayesian network meta-analysis suggests that GLP-1 RAs were associated with a decreased bone fracture risk compared to users of placebo or other anti-hyperglycemic drugs in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, and exenatide is the best option agent with regard to the risk of fracture.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Unnikrishnan R, Mohan V (2016) Diabetes in the tropics: prevalent, increasing and a major public health problem. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 110:263–264CrossRef Unnikrishnan R, Mohan V (2016) Diabetes in the tropics: prevalent, increasing and a major public health problem. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 110:263–264CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Drucker DJ (2018) Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab 27:740–756CrossRef Drucker DJ (2018) Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab 27:740–756CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gallwitz B (2015) GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes and beyond - new insights 2015. Eur Endocrinol 11:21–25CrossRef Gallwitz B (2015) GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes and beyond - new insights 2015. Eur Endocrinol 11:21–25CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mabilleau G, Gobron B, Bouvard B, Chappard D (2018) Incretin-based therapy for the treatment of bone fragility in diabetes mellitus. Peptides 100:108–113CrossRef Mabilleau G, Gobron B, Bouvard B, Chappard D (2018) Incretin-based therapy for the treatment of bone fragility in diabetes mellitus. Peptides 100:108–113CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goldshtein I, Nguyen AM, DePapp AE, Ish-Shalom S, Chandler JM, Chodick G, Shalev V (2018) Epidemiology and correlates of osteoporotic fractures among type 2 diabetic patients. Arch Osteoporos 13:15CrossRef Goldshtein I, Nguyen AM, DePapp AE, Ish-Shalom S, Chandler JM, Chodick G, Shalev V (2018) Epidemiology and correlates of osteoporotic fractures among type 2 diabetic patients. Arch Osteoporos 13:15CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Epstein S, Defeudis G, Manfrini S, Napoli N, Pozzilli P (2016) Diabetes and disordered bone metabolism (diabetic osteodystrophy): time for recognition. Osteoporos Int 27:1931–1951CrossRef Epstein S, Defeudis G, Manfrini S, Napoli N, Pozzilli P (2016) Diabetes and disordered bone metabolism (diabetic osteodystrophy): time for recognition. Osteoporos Int 27:1931–1951CrossRef
7.
go back to reference de Liefde II, van der Klift M, de Laet CE, van Daele PL, Hofman A, Pols HA (2005) Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int 16:1713–1720CrossRef de Liefde II, van der Klift M, de Laet CE, van Daele PL, Hofman A, Pols HA (2005) Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int 16:1713–1720CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Hillier TA, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE, Donaldson MG, Cauley JA, Harris TB, Koster A, Womack CR, Palermo L, Black DM (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305:2184–2192CrossRef Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Hillier TA, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE, Donaldson MG, Cauley JA, Harris TB, Koster A, Womack CR, Palermo L, Black DM (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305:2184–2192CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Faltinsen EG, Storebo OJ, Jakobsen JC, Boesen K, Lange T, Gluud C (2018) Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence? BMJ Evid Based Med 23:56–59CrossRef Faltinsen EG, Storebo OJ, Jakobsen JC, Boesen K, Lange T, Gluud C (2018) Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence? BMJ Evid Based Med 23:56–59CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRef Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2013) Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Mak 33:607–617CrossRef Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2013) Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Mak 33:607–617CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914CrossRef Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mawdsley D, Bennetts M, Dias S, Boucher M, Welton NJ (2016) Model-based network meta-analysis: a framework for evidence synthesis of clinical trial data. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 5:393–401CrossRef Mawdsley D, Bennetts M, Dias S, Boucher M, Welton NJ (2016) Model-based network meta-analysis: a framework for evidence synthesis of clinical trial data. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 5:393–401CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29:932–944CrossRef Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29:932–944CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Lu G, Khunti K (2006) Mixed comparison of stroke prevention treatments in individuals with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 166:1269–1275CrossRef Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Lu G, Khunti K (2006) Mixed comparison of stroke prevention treatments in individuals with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 166:1269–1275CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2016) Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 7:80–93CrossRef van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2016) Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 7:80–93CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, Ades AE (2013) Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment. Med Decis Mak 33:618–640CrossRef Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, Ades AE (2013) Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment. Med Decis Mak 33:618–640CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G (2013) Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 8:e76654CrossRef Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G (2013) Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 8:e76654CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mabilleau G, Mieczkowska A, Chappard D (2014) Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and bone fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Diabetes 6:260–266CrossRef Mabilleau G, Mieczkowska A, Chappard D (2014) Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and bone fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Diabetes 6:260–266CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Su B, Sheng H, Zhang M, Bu L, Yang P, Li L, Li F, Sheng C, Han Y, Qu S, Wang J (2015) Risk of bone fractures associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists' treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine 48:107–115CrossRef Su B, Sheng H, Zhang M, Bu L, Yang P, Li L, Li F, Sheng C, Han Y, Qu S, Wang J (2015) Risk of bone fractures associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists' treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine 48:107–115CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zeng I, Lumley T (2018) Review of statistical learning methods in integrated omics studies (an integrated information science). Bioinf Biol Insights 12:1216874372CrossRef Zeng I, Lumley T (2018) Review of statistical learning methods in integrated omics studies (an integrated information science). Bioinf Biol Insights 12:1216874372CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gunhan BK, Friede T, Held L (2017) A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations. Res Synth Methods 9:179–194CrossRef Gunhan BK, Friede T, Held L (2017) A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations. Res Synth Methods 9:179–194CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and fracture risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Authors
Y. S. Zhang
W. Y. Weng
B. C. Xie
Y. Meng
Y. H. Hao
Y. M. Liang
Z. K. Zhou
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4649-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Osteoporosis International 12/2018 Go to the issue