Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 2/2010

01-06-2010 | Review

Development and use of FRAX® in osteoporosis

Authors: J. A. Kanis, E. V. McCloskey, H. Johansson, A. Oden, O. Ström, F. Borgström

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Special Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper reviews briefly the development and clinical use of FRAX® in the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis.
Fractures are the clinical consequence of osteoporosis and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several treatments are available that have been shown to decrease the risk of fracture, but problems arise in identifying individuals at high fracture risk so that treatments can be effectively targeted. Case finding can be enhanced by the consideration of clinical risk factors that provide information on fracture risk over and above that provided by bone mineral density measurements. The FRAX tool integrates information on fracture risk from clinical risk factors with or without the use of BMD and can be used to improve the targeting of individuals at high fracture risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, de Laet C, Jonsson B (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fractures in Malmo. Osteoporis Int 11:669–674CrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, de Laet C, Jonsson B (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fractures in Malmo. Osteoporis Int 11:669–674CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Melton LJ 3rd (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141CrossRefPubMed Melton LJ 3rd (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, on behalf of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) et al (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, on behalf of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) et al (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boonen S, Body JJ, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM et al (2005) Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Osteoporos Int 16:239–254CrossRefPubMed Boonen S, Body JJ, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM et al (2005) Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Osteoporos Int 16:239–254CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1988) Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809CrossRefPubMed Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1988) Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2001) Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:989–995CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2001) Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:989–995CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16:581–589CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16:581–589CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 13:527–536CrossRef Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 13:527–536CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:1330–1338CrossRefPubMed De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:1330–1338CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2004) A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 35:1029–1037CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2004) A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 35:1029–1037CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2006) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162CrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2006) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2000) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–899CrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2000) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–899CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O et al (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O et al (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonnson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probability: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonnson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probability: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2009) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:1395–1408, Erratum published 2009 Osteoporos Int 20, 499-502CrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2009) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:1395–1408, Erratum published 2009 Osteoporos Int 20, 499-502CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2007) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom 10:120–123CrossRefPubMed Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2007) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom 10:120–123CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Oden A et al (2008) Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™). Osteoporos Int 19:429–448CrossRefPubMed Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Oden A et al (2008) Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™). Osteoporos Int 19:429–448CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kurth AA, Pfeilschifter J (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men. German Guidelines Update 2006. Orthopade 36:683–90, GermanCrossRefPubMed Kurth AA, Pfeilschifter J (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men. German Guidelines Update 2006. Orthopade 36:683–90, GermanCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMed Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Siris E, Delmas PD (2008) Assessment of 10-year absolute risk: a new paradigm with worldwide application. Osteoporos Int 19:383–384CrossRefPubMed Siris E, Delmas PD (2008) Assessment of 10-year absolute risk: a new paradigm with worldwide application. Osteoporos Int 19:383–384CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Johansson H, Kanis JA, Borgström F, Ström O, Svensson O, Mellström D (2010) FRAX® ett stöd för frakturprevention. Läkartidningen, in press Johansson H, Kanis JA, Borgström F, Ström O, Svensson O, Mellström D (2010) FRAX® ett stöd för frakturprevention. Läkartidningen, in press
27.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians, London Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians, London
28.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain (2000) Update on pharmacological interventions and an algorithm for management. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain (2000) Update on pharmacological interventions and an algorithm for management. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
29.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians (2002) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Guidelines on prevention and treatment. Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, National Osteoporosis Society and Royal College of Physicians. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK Royal College of Physicians (2002) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Guidelines on prevention and treatment. Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, National Osteoporosis Society and Royal College of Physicians. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
30.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgström F, Cooper C, Jönsson B, Preedy D et al (2008) The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis. Bone 42:4–15CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgström F, Cooper C, Jönsson B, Preedy D et al (2008) The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis. Bone 42:4–15CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Stevenson M, McCloskey EV, Davis S, Lloyd-Jones M (2007) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 11:1–256 Kanis JA, Stevenson M, McCloskey EV, Davis S, Lloyd-Jones M (2007) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 11:1–256
32.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, on behalf of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229–238CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, on behalf of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229–238CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Guideline Group on behalf of the Bone Research Society, British Geriatrics Society, British Society of Rheumatology, Society of Endocrinology, British Orthopaedic Association, Primary Care Rheumatology Society, Osteoporosis 2000 and Osteoporosis Dorset (2008) Osteoporosis: clinical guideline for prevention and treatment. University of Sheffield Press, Sheffield National Osteoporosis Guideline Group on behalf of the Bone Research Society, British Geriatrics Society, British Society of Rheumatology, Society of Endocrinology, British Orthopaedic Association, Primary Care Rheumatology Society, Osteoporosis 2000 and Osteoporosis Dorset (2008) Osteoporosis: clinical guideline for prevention and treatment. University of Sheffield Press, Sheffield
34.
go back to reference Tsang SWY, Kanis KAWC, JA JH, Oden A (2009) Ten-year fracture probability in Hong Kong southern Chinese according to age and BMD femoral neck T-scores. Osteoporos Int 20:1939–1945CrossRefPubMed Tsang SWY, Kanis KAWC, JA JH, Oden A (2009) Ten-year fracture probability in Hong Kong southern Chinese according to age and BMD femoral neck T-scores. Osteoporos Int 20:1939–1945CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Czerwiński E, Badurski JE, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E, Osieleniec J (2007) Current understanding of osteoporosis according to the position of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Osteoporosis Foundation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9:337–356PubMed Czerwiński E, Badurski JE, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E, Osieleniec J (2007) Current understanding of osteoporosis according to the position of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Osteoporosis Foundation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9:337–356PubMed
36.
go back to reference Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2010) FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 21:381–390CrossRefPubMed Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2010) FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 21:381–390CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Neuprez A, Johansson H, Kanis JA et al (2009) A FRAX model for the assessment of fracture probability in Belgium. Rev Med Liege 64:612–619PubMed Neuprez A, Johansson H, Kanis JA et al (2009) A FRAX model for the assessment of fracture probability in Belgium. Rev Med Liege 64:612–619PubMed
38.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) (2008) Clinician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, National Osteoporosis Foundation Washington www.nof.org National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) (2008) Clinician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, National Osteoporosis Foundation Washington www.​nof.​org
39.
go back to reference Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S et al (2008) National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMed Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S et al (2008) National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2006) Guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products in the treatment of primary osteoporosis. Ref CPMP/EWP/552/95Rev.2. London, CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2006) Guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products in the treatment of primary osteoporosis. Ref CPMP/EWP/552/95Rev.2. London, CHMP
41.
go back to reference McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2009) Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy—additional results from a double blind, placebo controlled randomised study. Osteoporos Int 20:811–818CrossRefPubMed McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2009) Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy—additional results from a double blind, placebo controlled randomised study. Osteoporos Int 20:811–818CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Bazedoxifene reduces vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk assessed with FRAX®. Bone 44:49–54 Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Bazedoxifene reduces vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk assessed with FRAX®. Bone 44:49–54
Metadata
Title
Development and use of FRAX® in osteoporosis
Authors
J. A. Kanis
E. V. McCloskey
H. Johansson
A. Oden
O. Ström
F. Borgström
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue Special Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1253-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2010

Osteoporosis International 2/2010 Go to the issue