Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 5/2004

01-05-2004 | Original Article

Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Authors: M. Hudelmaier, V. Kuhn, E. M. Lochmüller, H. Well, M. Priemel, T. M. Link, F. Eckstein

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is generally based on the assessment of bone mineral content with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) but does not account for the spatial distribution and inherent material properties of the tissue. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) permits one to measure the compartment-specific density and geometry-based parameters of cortical bone. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters are associated with material properties of cortical bone. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that pQCT and cortical QUS provide additional information to DXA in predicting structural strength of the distal radius. The intact right arm and the isolated left radius were harvested from 70 formalin-fixed cadavers (age 79±11 years). The bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed with DXA at the radial metaphysis and shaft. pQCT was also used at the metaphysis and the shaft, while QUS was employed only at the shaft. The failure loads of the radius were assessed by use of a 3-point bending test (isolated radius) and a complex fall simulation (intact arm). The BMC (DXA) displayed a correlation of r=0.96 with the failure moments in 3-point bending (P<0.001). The correlation between failure load and geometry-based parameters (pQCT) ranged from r=0.85 to r=0.96 and was r=0.64 for the speed of sound (QUS) (P <0.001). Cortical thickness (pQCT) improved the prediction marginally (r=0.964) in combination with DXA. For the fall simulation, the correlation coefficients were r=0.76 for BMC (DXA) of the shaft, r=0.83 for metaphyseal bone content (pQCT), r=0.55 for QUS, and ranged from r=0.59 to r=0.74 for geometry-based parameters at the shaft (pQCT). pQCT and QUS parameters provided no significant improvement versus DXA alone. Measurement of bone mass by DXA or pQCT thus appears to be sufficient as a surrogate of mechanical strength and fracture risk of the distal radius.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML (1997) Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implications for assessment of fracture risk. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 69–111 Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML (1997) Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implications for assessment of fracture risk. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 69–111
2.
go back to reference Guglielmi G, Schneider P, Lang TF, et al (1997) Quantitative computed tomography at the axial and peripheral skeleton. Eur Radiol 7:32–42PubMed Guglielmi G, Schneider P, Lang TF, et al (1997) Quantitative computed tomography at the axial and peripheral skeleton. Eur Radiol 7:32–42PubMed
3.
go back to reference Groll O, Lochmuller EM, Bachmeier M, et al (1999) Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT. Skeletal Radiol 28:696–702CrossRefPubMed Groll O, Lochmuller EM, Bachmeier M, et al (1999) Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT. Skeletal Radiol 28:696–702CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lochmuller EM, Lill CA, Kuhn V, et al (2002) Radius bone strength in bending, compression, and falling and its correlation with clinical densitometry at multiple sites. J Bone Miner Res 17:1629–1638PubMed Lochmuller EM, Lill CA, Kuhn V, et al (2002) Radius bone strength in bending, compression, and falling and its correlation with clinical densitometry at multiple sites. J Bone Miner Res 17:1629–1638PubMed
5.
go back to reference Formica CA, Nieves JW, Cosman F, et al (1998) Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 8:460–467CrossRefPubMed Formica CA, Nieves JW, Cosman F, et al (1998) Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 8:460–467CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Augat P, Iida H, Jiang Y, et al (1998) Distal radius fractures: mechanisms of injury and strength prediction by bone mineral assessment. J Orthop Res 16:629–635PubMed Augat P, Iida H, Jiang Y, et al (1998) Distal radius fractures: mechanisms of injury and strength prediction by bone mineral assessment. J Orthop Res 16:629–635PubMed
7.
go back to reference Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7 Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7
8.
go back to reference Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Malavolta N (2000) Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:518–523CrossRefPubMed Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Malavolta N (2000) Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:518–523CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, et al (1999) Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14:644–651PubMed Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, et al (1999) Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14:644–651PubMed
10.
go back to reference Pithioux M, Lasaygues P, Chabrand P (2002) An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 35:961–968CrossRefPubMed Pithioux M, Lasaygues P, Chabrand P (2002) An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 35:961–968CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pöpperl G, Lochmüller EM, Becker H, et al (1999) Determination of calcaneal ultrasound properties ex situ: reproducibility, effects of storage, formalin fixation, maceration, and changes in anatomic measurement site. Calcif Tissue Int 65:192–197CrossRefPubMed Pöpperl G, Lochmüller EM, Becker H, et al (1999) Determination of calcaneal ultrasound properties ex situ: reproducibility, effects of storage, formalin fixation, maceration, and changes in anatomic measurement site. Calcif Tissue Int 65:192–197CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, et al (2001) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int 12:28–34CrossRefPubMed Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, et al (2001) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int 12:28–34CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sievanen H, Cheng S, Ollikainen S, et al (2001) Ultrasound velocity and cortical bone characteristics in vivo. Osteoporos Int 12:399–405CrossRefPubMed Sievanen H, Cheng S, Ollikainen S, et al (2001) Ultrasound velocity and cortical bone characteristics in vivo. Osteoporos Int 12:399–405CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference van den Bergh JP, van Lenthe GH, Hermus AR, et al (2000) Speed of sound reflects Young’s modulus as assessed by microstructural finite element analysis. Bone 26:519–524CrossRefPubMed van den Bergh JP, van Lenthe GH, Hermus AR, et al (2000) Speed of sound reflects Young’s modulus as assessed by microstructural finite element analysis. Bone 26:519–524CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wu C, Hans D, He Y, et al (2000) Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound. Bone 26:529–533CrossRefPubMed Wu C, Hans D, He Y, et al (2000) Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound. Bone 26:529–533CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, et al (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230PubMed Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, et al (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475CrossRefPubMed Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huiskes R (2000) If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 197:145–156PubMed Huiskes R (2000) If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 197:145–156PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lill CA, Goldhahn J, Albrecht A, et al (2003) Impact of bone density on distal radius fracture patterns and comparison between five different fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 17:271–278CrossRefPubMed Lill CA, Goldhahn J, Albrecht A, et al (2003) Impact of bone density on distal radius fracture patterns and comparison between five different fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 17:271–278CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lochmüller EM, Krefting N, Bürklein D, et al (2001) Effect of fixation, soft-tissues, and scan projection on bone mineral measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcif Tissue Int 68:140–145CrossRefPubMed Lochmüller EM, Krefting N, Bürklein D, et al (2001) Effect of fixation, soft-tissues, and scan projection on bone mineral measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcif Tissue Int 68:140–145CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Muller ME, Webber CE, Bouxsein ML (2003) Predicting the failure load of the distal radius. Osteoporos Int 14:345–352CrossRefPubMed Muller ME, Webber CE, Bouxsein ML (2003) Predicting the failure load of the distal radius. Osteoporos Int 14:345–352CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, et al (1994) Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clin Biomech 9:175–179 Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, et al (1994) Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clin Biomech 9:175–179
Metadata
Title
Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?
Authors
M. Hudelmaier
V. Kuhn
E. M. Lochmüller
H. Well
M. Priemel
T. M. Link
F. Eckstein
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1551-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Osteoporosis International 5/2004 Go to the issue