Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2022

01-02-2022 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Abdominal pressure and pelvic organ prolapse: is there an association?

Authors: Yu Hwee Tan, Moshe Gillor, Hans Peter Dietz

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The primary aim of this study was to assess for an association between maximal intra-abdominal pressure reached on Valsalva (MAP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on subjective, clinical and sonographic evaluation. Another objective was to test for association between MAP and body mass index (BMI).

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 504 archived datasets of women seen for pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms between January 2017 to September 2019 at a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Patients underwent a standardized interview including use of visual analogue scores (VAS) to evaluate bother of pelvic floor symptoms, examination using the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (ICS POP-Q), dual-channel filling and voiding cystometry, test for MAP as well as four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound. Analysis of ultrasound volumes for pelvic organ descent was performed blinded against all other data.

Results

There was a weak but significant association between MAP and sonographic rectal ampulla descent (p = 0.0275). There was also a significant association between MAP and bother of obstructed defecation symptoms (p = 0.0065). Symptomatic, clinical and sonographic POP in the anterior or the apical compartments was not significantly associated with MAP. On multivariate analysis, the association between MAP and rectal descent remained significant (p = 0.01). There was no significant association between BMI and MAP.

Conclusions

This cross-sectional study showed an association between MAP and posterior compartment prolapse on imaging as well as between MAP and the bother score of obstructed defecation symptoms. There was no association between BMI and MAP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hendrix SL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160.CrossRef Hendrix SL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Olsen AL, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501.CrossRef Olsen AL, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith FJ, Holman CDJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.CrossRef Smith FJ, Holman CDJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dietz HP. The aetiology of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(10):1323–9.CrossRef Dietz HP. The aetiology of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(10):1323–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559–73.CrossRef Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559–73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Young N, Atan IK, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP. Obesity: how much does it matter for female pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1129–34.CrossRef Young N, Atan IK, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP. Obesity: how much does it matter for female pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1129–34.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806.CrossRef Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.CrossRef Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Noblett KL, Jensen JK, Ostergard DR. The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel Cystometry. Int Urogynecol J. 1997;8:323–6.CrossRef Noblett KL, Jensen JK, Ostergard DR. The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel Cystometry. Int Urogynecol J. 1997;8:323–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ulrich D, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP, Mann K, Trutnovsky G. Use of a visual analog scale for evaluation of bother from pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:693–7.CrossRef Ulrich D, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP, Mann K, Trutnovsky G. Use of a visual analog scale for evaluation of bother from pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:693–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An international Urogynaecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2010;29:4–20.CrossRef Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An international Urogynaecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2010;29:4–20.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling Cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2002;21:261–74.CrossRef Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling Cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2002;21:261–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. II: three- dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):615–25.CrossRef Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. II: three- dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):615–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):451–5.CrossRef Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):451–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, JOL DL, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, JOL DL, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dietz H, Haylen B, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511–4.CrossRef Dietz H, Haylen B, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1783–7.CrossRef Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1783–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shek KL, Dietz HP. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:681–92.CrossRef Shek KL, Dietz HP. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:681–92.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(1):73–7.CrossRef Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(1):73–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, et al. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynaecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:939–44.CrossRef Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, et al. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynaecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:939–44.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Braverman M, Kamisan Atan I, Turel F, et al. Does patient posture affect the ultrasound evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse? J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38:233–8.CrossRef Braverman M, Kamisan Atan I, Turel F, et al. Does patient posture affect the ultrasound evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse? J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38:233–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Mias NL, Subramaniam N, Friedman T, et al. Prolapse assessment supine and standing: do we need different cutoffs for “significant prolapse”? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:685–9.CrossRef Rodriguez-Mias NL, Subramaniam N, Friedman T, et al. Prolapse assessment supine and standing: do we need different cutoffs for “significant prolapse”? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:685–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Abdominal pressure and pelvic organ prolapse: is there an association?
Authors
Yu Hwee Tan
Moshe Gillor
Hans Peter Dietz
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04811-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2022 Go to the issue