Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of urethral mobility measurement by ultrasound in women: a cross-section study

Authors: Ana Jessica dos Santos Sousa, Juliana Falcão Padilha, Jordana Barbosa da Silva, Humberto Sadanobu Hirakawa, Enio Júnior Seidel, Patricia Driusso

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To verify the intra- and inter-rater reliability of urethral mobility measurement evaluated by ultrasound (US).

Methods

This is a reliability study realized according to Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. Twenty-one nulliparous women (25.5 ± 3.3 SD years) were volunteers. Two examiners (E1 and E2) performed the measurement of urethral mobility at rest and Valsalva on the same day. Three measurements were recorded for each moment and the mean of them were used for analysis. To perform the analysis, bladder mobility was calculated using the following equation: \( UM=\sqrt{{\left( Vy- Ry\right)}^2+{\left( Vx- Rx\right)}^2} \), where “x” is the vertical distance, “y” is the horizontal distance from the dorsocaudal margin of the pubic symphysis, “V” is the Valsalva maneuver, and “R” means rest. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated considering: ICC ≥ 0.75, excellent; 0.40 ≤ ICC <0.75, satisfactory; ICC < 0.40, poor, with a significance level of 5% and 95% confidence interval.

Results

The intra-rater reliabilities of E1 and E2 were considered excellent between the two evaluations, with ICC 0.98 (p < 0.0001) for the E1 and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) for E2. The inter-rater reliability was considered excellent (ICC = 0.83).

Conclusions

Both intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of urethral mobility measurement were considered to have excellent agreement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DeLancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713–23.CrossRef DeLancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:220–4.CrossRef Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:220–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Granados Loarca EA, Alcahe VR, de Leon López H, Echeverria Reyes J. The usefulness of perineal ultrasound in urinary incontinence in women. Arch Esp Urol. 1999;52:778–82.PubMed Granados Loarca EA, Alcahe VR, de Leon López H, Echeverria Reyes J. The usefulness of perineal ultrasound in urinary incontinence in women. Arch Esp Urol. 1999;52:778–82.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Naranjo-Ortiz C, Shek KL, Martin AJ, Dietz HP. What is normal bladder neck anatomy? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:945–50.CrossRef Naranjo-Ortiz C, Shek KL, Martin AJ, Dietz HP. What is normal bladder neck anatomy? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:945–50.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Di Pietto L, et al. Perineal ultrasound in the study of urethral mobility: proposal of a normal physiological range. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1405–9.CrossRef Di Pietto L, et al. Perineal ultrasound in the study of urethral mobility: proposal of a normal physiological range. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1405–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jamard E, et al. Utility of 2D-ultrasound in pelvic floor muscle contraction and bladder neck mobility assessment in women with urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2019;49:101629.CrossRef Jamard E, et al. Utility of 2D-ultrasound in pelvic floor muscle contraction and bladder neck mobility assessment in women with urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2019;49:101629.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization, WHO. Manual of diagnostic ultrasound, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2011. World Health Organization, WHO. Manual of diagnostic ultrasound, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
8.
go back to reference Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92.CrossRef Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brækken IH, et al. Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:227–35.CrossRef Brækken IH, et al. Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:227–35.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pereira VS, Hirakawa HS, Oliveira AB, Driusso P. Relationship among vaginal palpation, vaginal squeeze pressure, electromyographic and ultrasonographic variables of female pelvic floor muscles. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18:428–34.CrossRef Pereira VS, Hirakawa HS, Oliveira AB, Driusso P. Relationship among vaginal palpation, vaginal squeeze pressure, electromyographic and ultrasonographic variables of female pelvic floor muscles. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18:428–34.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:337–42.CrossRef Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:337–42.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bisi MC, et al. Ultrassonografia articular: confiabilidade interobservadores em artrite reumatoide. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:250–4.CrossRef Bisi MC, et al. Ultrassonografia articular: confiabilidade interobservadores em artrite reumatoide. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:250–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–5.CrossRef Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Padilha JF, da Silva JB, Seidel EJ, Driusso P. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of post-void residual bladder volume with ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2019:1–7. Padilha JF, da Silva JB, Seidel EJ, Driusso P. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of post-void residual bladder volume with ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2019:1–7.
16.
go back to reference Talasz H, Kofler M, Lechleitner M. Misconception of the Valsalva maneuver. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1197–8.CrossRef Talasz H, Kofler M, Lechleitner M. Misconception of the Valsalva maneuver. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1197–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Junginger B, Baessler K, Sapsford R, Hodges PW. Effect of abdominal and pelvic floor tasks on muscle activity, abdominal pressure and bladder neck. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:69–77.CrossRef Junginger B, Baessler K, Sapsford R, Hodges PW. Effect of abdominal and pelvic floor tasks on muscle activity, abdominal pressure and bladder neck. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:69–77.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bø K, Berghmans B, Morkved S, Van Kampen M. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. Bø K, Berghmans B, Morkved S, Van Kampen M. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2015.
19.
go back to reference Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Brower WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Brower WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
20.
go back to reference Martin Bland J, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef Martin Bland J, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pizzoferrato AC, et al. Perineal ultrasound for the measurement of urethral mobility: a study of inter- and intra-observer reliability. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1551–7.CrossRef Pizzoferrato AC, et al. Perineal ultrasound for the measurement of urethral mobility: a study of inter- and intra-observer reliability. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1551–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Salvatore S, et al. Inter-observer reliability of three different methods of measuring urethrovesical mobility. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1513–7.CrossRef Salvatore S, et al. Inter-observer reliability of three different methods of measuring urethrovesical mobility. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1513–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dickie K, Shek K, Dietz H. The relationship between urethral mobility and parity. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1220–4.CrossRef Dickie K, Shek K, Dietz H. The relationship between urethral mobility and parity. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1220–4.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bø K. Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work? Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15:76–84.CrossRef Bø K. Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work? Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15:76–84.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of urethral mobility measurement by ultrasound in women: a cross-section study
Authors
Ana Jessica dos Santos Sousa
Juliana Falcão Padilha
Jordana Barbosa da Silva
Humberto Sadanobu Hirakawa
Enio Júnior Seidel
Patricia Driusso
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04381-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2021 Go to the issue