Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

What is normal bladder neck anatomy?

Authors: Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz, Ka Lai Shek, Andrew James Martin, Hans Peter Dietz

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Functional anatomy of the bladder neck and proximal urethra has been studied extensively because of the belief that it is important for urinary continence. The aim of this study was to explore the limits of normality for pelvic floor ultrasound parameters of bladder neck and urethral mobility associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 589 women seen for urodynamic testing in a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. All women were assessed following a protocol including interview, clinical examination, flowmetry, urodynamic testing and 4D pelvic floor ultrasound. Volume data sets were analysed offline to assess for bladder neck descent (BND), urethral rotation and the retrovesical angle (RVA) on maximal Valsalva.

Results

After excluding women with previous incontinence or prolapse surgery, 429 datasets were available. SI was significantly associated with the RVA (p = 0.033) and BND (p = 0.036); USI was associated with urethral rotation (p = 0.021) and BND (p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for confounders including age, BMI, parity, previous hysterectomy and maximal urethral pressure, the association between SUI and BND remained significant (OR [per 10 mm] = 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.01 to 1.51; p = 0.043), as did the association between USI and BND (OR [per 10 mm] = 1.58; 95 % CI: 1.3 to 1.91; p < 0.001). ROC statistics for BND suggested a cut-off of 25 mm in describing the limit of normality.

Conclusions

Measures of functional bladder neck anatomy are weakly associated with SUI and USI (with association between BND and USI being the strongest). It is suggested that a BND of 25 mm or higher be defined as abnormal (“hypermobile”) on the basis of its association with USI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT (2000) Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 11(5):301–319CrossRef Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT (2000) Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 11(5):301–319CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Nazemian K, Shek KL, Martin A (2013) Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1399–1403CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Nazemian K, Shek KL, Martin A (2013) Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1399–1403CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):507–511CrossRefPubMed Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):507–511CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274CrossRefPubMed Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. I. Two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1):80–92CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. I. Two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1):80–92CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Oerno AK, Dietz HP (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):346–350CrossRef Oerno AK, Dietz HP (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):346–350CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 23(2):175–178CrossRefPubMed Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 23(2):175–178CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tan L, Shek KL, Guzman Rojas RA, Dietz HP (2015) The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 6(11):1667–1672CrossRef Tan L, Shek KL, Guzman Rojas RA, Dietz HP (2015) The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 6(11):1667–1672CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shek KL, Dietz HP (2008) The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):337–342CrossRefPubMed Shek KL, Dietz HP (2008) The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):337–342CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB (2008) Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. Springer, LondonCrossRef Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB (2008) Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. Springer, LondonCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O (2007) Ultrasound assessment of prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:688–691CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O (2007) Ultrasound assessment of prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:688–691CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zhang X, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2015) How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 26(9):1355–1359 Zhang X, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2015) How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 26(9):1355–1359
16.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2004) Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):95–99CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2004) Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):95–99CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Reed H, Freeman RM, Waterfield A, Adekanmi O (2003) Prevalence of bladder neck mobility in asymptomatic non-pregnant nulliparous volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111(2):172–175CrossRef Reed H, Freeman RM, Waterfield A, Adekanmi O (2003) Prevalence of bladder neck mobility in asymptomatic non-pregnant nulliparous volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111(2):172–175CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mulder F, Shek K, Dietz H (2012) The pressure factor in the assessment of pelvic organ mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:282–285CrossRefPubMed Mulder F, Shek K, Dietz H (2012) The pressure factor in the assessment of pelvic organ mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:282–285CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Peschers UM, Fanger G, Schaer GN, Vodusek DB, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (2001) Bladder neck mobility in continent nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(3):320–324 Peschers UM, Fanger G, Schaer GN, Vodusek DB, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (2001) Bladder neck mobility in continent nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(3):320–324
20.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J 12(1):38–41CrossRef Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J 12(1):38–41CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P (2002) Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13(5):289–293CrossRef Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P (2002) Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13(5):289–293CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What is normal bladder neck anatomy?
Authors
Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz
Ka Lai Shek
Andrew James Martin
Hans Peter Dietz
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2916-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016 Go to the issue