Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Ultrasound | Review Article

Clinical application of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh

Authors: Annika Taithongchai, Abdul H. Sultan, Pawel A. Wieczorek, Ranee Thakar

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This mini-review demonstrates the clinical application of pelvic floor ultrasound for imaging women with mesh following incontinence and prolapse surgical procedures.

Methods

The images are obtained using two-dimensional (2D) perineal pelvic floor ultrasound (pPFUS) and three-dimensional (3D) endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS).

Results

2D pPFUS and 3D EVUS provide confirmation of the presence or absence of vaginal wall mesh (VWM), bulking agents, and the type of mid-urethral sling (MUS). Residual mesh following excision can be located, and presence in the bladder/urethra may be demonstrated. These are crucial for surgical planning and counselling, with the potential to be useful intraoperatively also. The shape and position relative to urethral length and lumen can be assessed, which may correspond with voiding dysfunction or recurrent incontinence. Evidence of inflammation/sepsis or folding of the VWM may be useful in the investigation of pain.

Conclusions

Pelvic floor ultrasound is the standard of care where imaging is available and utilised and is the only modality capable of reliably visualising mesh. It is clear that there are significant benefits and uses for the clinician for investigating complications of VWM or MUS; although many of the findings may be associated with clinical symptoms, some are incidental findings. Therefore, these scans should be performed by pelvic floor specialists with core competency in pelvic floor ultrasound and interpreted by those familiar with their significance, as an adjunct to patient history, examination and other investigations to assist in the most appropriate management plan for the patient. In addition, there is still a need for standardisation in terminology and measurement techniques, to allow for consistent and comparable reporting.
Literature
1.
Paraiso MR, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(6):1249–58.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Benedon MS, Mekel G, Stern M, Billah M, Ougbade K, Bendavid R, Lakovlev V (2015) Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Rev Urol;2(9):481–509.CrossRef
3.
Gurol-Urganci I, Geary RS, Mamza JB, Duckett J, El-Hamamsy D, Dolan L, et al. Long-term rate of mesh sling removal following Midurethral mesh sling insertion among women with stress urinary incontinence. JAMA. 2018;320(16):1659–69.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Manonai J, Rostaminia G, Denson L, Shobeiri SA. Clinical and ultrasonographic study of patients presenting with transvaginal mesh complications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(3):407–11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Khatri G, Carmel M, Bailey A, Foreman M, Brewington C, Zimmern P, et al. Postoperative imaging after surgical repair for pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics. 2016;36(4):1233–56.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Schuettoff SA, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A, Tunn R. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:687–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Dietz H, Barry C, Lim Y, Rane A. 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound in the evaluation of suburethral sling implants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:253.CrossRef
15.
Lin KL, Ys J, Lo TS, Liu CM, Tsai EM, Long CY. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of compression effect on urethra following tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:452–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Tunn R, Picot A, Marschke J, Gauruder-Burmester A. Sonomorphological evaluation of polypropylene mesh implants after vaginal mesh repair in women with cystocele or rectocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:449–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kociszewski J, Kolben S, Barski D, Viereck V, Barcz E. Complications following tension-free vaginal tapes: accurate diagnosis and complications management. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:538391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, Mellgrans A, Sultan AH, Shobeiri SA, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:381–96.CrossRefPubMed
19.
AIUM/IUGA. Practice parameter for the performance of urogynecological ultrasound examinations: developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and the SRU. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(4):851–64.CrossRef
20.
Staack A, Vitale J, Ragavendra N, Rodriguez LV. Translabial ultrasonography for evaluation of synthetic mesh in the vagina. Urology. 2014;83(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Denson L, Shobeiri SA. Three-dimensional endovaginal sonography of synthetic implanted materials in the female pelvic floor. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:521–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Wong V, Guzman-Rojas R, Shek KL, Chou D, Moore KH, Dietz HP. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:404–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Mukati MS, Shobeiri SA. Transvaginal sling release with intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(3):184–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Dietz HP, Mourtisen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:904–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kolben S, Eberhard J, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Tape functionality: position, change in shape, and outcome after TVT procedure—mid-term results. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:795–800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Dresler MM, Kociszewski J, Wlazlak E, Pedraszewski P, Trzeciak A, Surkont G. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements of the suburethral tape location obtained in pelvic floor ultrasound performed with a transvaginal probe. J Ultrasound. 2017;17:101–5.
27.
Bogusiewicz M, Monist M, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak M, Wieczorek AP, Rechberger T. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failures have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra. Ginekol Pol. 2013;84:334–8.PubMed
28.
Ng CC, Lee LC, Han WH. Use of three-dimensional ultrasound scan to assess the clinical importance of midurethral placement of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(3):220–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbuhler V, Hilgers R, et al. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:485–90.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. Does the TVT stay where you put it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:950–3.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Larson K, Scott L, Cunningham TD, Zhao Y, Abuhamad A, Takacs P. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound findings in women with high-pressure voiding after midurethral sling placement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(2):141–5.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Dietz HP, Wilson PD. The ‘iris effect’: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help understand anti-incontinence procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:267–71.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(4):493–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound: does it correlate with outcome 1 year following surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(6):857–64.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Dietz HP, Erdmann M, Shek KL. Mesh contraction: myth or reality? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:173.e1–4.CrossRef
37.
Majkusiak W, Pomian A, Tomasik P, Horosz E, Zwierzchowska A, Kociszewski J, et al. Does the suburethral sling change its location? Int J Urol. 2017;24:848–53.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Wlazlak E, Kluz T, Wrobel A, Krzycka M, Surkont G. The effectiveness of a pre-pubic four-arm MAZCA-TC mesh in treating cystocele and stress urinary incontinence simultaneously—results controlled with a pelvic floor ultrasound. A preliminary study. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(11):579–84.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Lo TS, Tan YL, Cortes EFM, Lin YH, Wu PY, Pue LB. Influence of anterior vaginal mesh with concomitant mid-urethral sling surgery on stress urinary incontinence: clinical and sonographic outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:593–600.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Rogowski A, Bienkowski P, Tosiak A, Jerzak M, Mierzejewski P, Baranowski W. Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:2087–92.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J, Maher C, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, Webb R; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society; Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(1):2–12
42.
Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Garbin O, Rosenthal C, et al. Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(4):449–56.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Dietz HP. Mesh in prolapse surgery: an imaging perspective. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:495–503.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Bogusiewicz M. Ultrasound imaging in urogynaecology—state of the art 2016. Menopause Rev. 2016;15(3):123–32.CrossRef
45.
Bako A, Dhar R. Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:103–11.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Chan L, Tse V. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J Urol. 2018;36:753–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Pavlikova M. Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation—evidence of mesh contraction or folding? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:529–33.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Ostergard DR. Polypropylene vaginal mesh grafts in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):962–6.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Chughtai B, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, Eilber KS, Anger JT, Clemens JQ. Is vaginal mesh a stimulus of autoimmune disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(5):495e1–495.CrossRef
50.
Javadian P, Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA. In vivo ultrasound characteristics of vaginal mesh kit complications. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(2):162–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical application of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh
Authors
Annika Taithongchai
Abdul H. Sultan
Pawel A. Wieczorek
Ranee Thakar
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03973-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2019 Go to the issue

Original Article

Transobturator mid-urethral sling in females with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor underactivity: effect on voiding phase

Original Article

Pelvic floor dysfunction at transperineal ultrasound and voiding alteration in women with posterior deep endometriosis

Letter to the Editor

Authors’ reply to comment by Tailor et. al on “Academic cosmetic gynecology and energy-based therapies: ambiguities, explorations, and FDA advisories”

Original Article

Validation study of ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements

Original Article

Decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse: a question of geography?

Original Article

Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery