Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

Documenting pessary offer prior to hysterectomy for management of pelvic organ prolapse

Authors: Anne G. Sammarco, Daniel M. Morgan, Neil S. Kamdar, Carolyn W. Swenson

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To (1) determine the proportion of hysterectomy cases with documentation of pessary counseling prior to prolapse surgery and (2) identify variables associated with women offered a pessary.

Study design

The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) is a hysterectomy improvement initiative. Hysterectomies from 2013 to 2015 in which prolapse was the principal diagnosis were included. “Pessary offer” was defined as documentation showing the patient declined, could not tolerate, or failed a pessary trial. Bivariate analyses were used to compare demographics, medical history, surgical route, concomitant procedures (colpopexy or colporrhaphy), and intra- and postoperative complications between women with and without pessary offer. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to determine factors independently associated with pessary offer. Risk-adjusted pessary offer rates by hospital were calculated.

Results

The adjusted rate of pessary offer was 25.2%, ranging from 3 to 76% per hospital. Bivariate comparisons showed differences between women with and without pessary offer in age, tobacco use, prior pelvic surgery, insurance status, surgical approach, secondary indication for surgery, concomitant prolapse procedure, teaching hospital status and hospital bed size. In logistic regression, odds of pessary offer increased with age > 55 years (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12–1.88, p = 0.006), Medicare insurance (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30–2.10, p < 0.0001), and a concomitant procedure (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.16–1.93, p = 0.002). Postoperative urinary tract infections were more common in patients offered a pessary (6.4% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001), but other complications were similar.

Conclusions

Overall, only one-quarter of hysterectomies for prolapse in MSQC hospitals had documentation of pessary counseling—suggesting an opportunity to improve documentation, counseling regarding pessary use, or both.
Literature
14.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMed Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2(5):281–4.CrossRef Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2(5):281–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addison WA. A survey of pessary use by members of the American urogynecologic society. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):931–5.PubMed Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addison WA. A survey of pessary use by members of the American urogynecologic society. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):931–5.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Documenting pessary offer prior to hysterectomy for management of pelvic organ prolapse
Authors
Anne G. Sammarco
Daniel M. Morgan
Neil S. Kamdar
Carolyn W. Swenson
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3696-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2019 Go to the issue