Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Short-term surgical outcomes and characteristics of patients with mesh complications from pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery

Authors: Jessica Hammett, Ann Peters, Elisa Trowbridge, Kathie Hullfish

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can include the use of synthetic materials. Placement of synthetic materials into the vaginal wall, through either the vagina or the abdomen, includes the risk of complications such as vaginal wall extrusion or pain. There is little data regarding outcomes following treatment of mesh complications.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent excision of mesh placed for POP or SUI between 1 January 2001 and 31 October 2012 was performed at the University of Virginia. Chart abstraction queried patient demographics, clinical history, physical examination, pre- and post-excision symptoms, and operative findings. The International Continence Society (ICS) and International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) classification system was used to define the nature and location of mesh complications.

Results

A total of 57 patients (26 mid-urethral slings, 23 transvaginal prolapse, 9 intraperitoneal prolapse) with the diagnosis of mesh extrusion into the vaginal wall were analyzed. Twenty-five (average 2.8 cases/year) original mesh surgeries occurred between January 2001 and January 2010 and 41 (average 20.5 cases/year) occurred after January 2010. The most common presenting patient complaints were chronic pelvic pain (55.9 %), dyspareunia (54.4 %), and vaginal discharge (30.9 %). At a 6-week post-operative visit, 57.3 % of patient’s symptoms were completely resolved and 14.6 % were improved.

Conclusion

Clinicians should be cognizant of the variable presentations of post-operative vaginal mesh complications. Mesh excision by experienced pelvic surgeons is an effective and safe treatment for these complications; however, a significant number of patients may have persistent symptoms following surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsud KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305PubMedCrossRef Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsud KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K (2005) Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med 165:537–542PubMedCrossRef Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K (2005) Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med 165:537–542PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Funk MJ, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, Amundsen CL, Wu JM (2013) Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecolo 208(73):e1–e7 Funk MJ, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, Amundsen CL, Wu JM (2013) Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecolo 208(73):e1–e7
4.
go back to reference Administration USFaD (2008) Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse Administration USFaD (2008) Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse
5.
go back to reference Administration USFaD (2011) Surgical mesh for treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: FDA Executive Summary Administration USFaD (2011) Surgical mesh for treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: FDA Executive Summary
6.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:515–526PubMedCrossRef Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:515–526PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(86):e1–e9PubMed Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(86):e1–e9PubMed
9.
go back to reference Funk MJ, Edenfield AL, Pate V, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Wu JM (2012) Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(1):e1–e7 Funk MJ, Edenfield AL, Pate V, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Wu JM (2012) Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(1):e1–e7
10.
go back to reference South MMT, Foster RT, Webster GD, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2007) Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:615.e1–615.e5CrossRef South MMT, Foster RT, Webster GD, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2007) Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:615.e1–615.e5CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2008) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24CrossRef Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2008) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chermansky GJ, Winters JC (2012) Complications of vaginal mesh surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22:287–291PubMedCrossRef Chermansky GJ, Winters JC (2012) Complications of vaginal mesh surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22:287–291PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, McAchran SE, Goldman HB, Jelovsek JE (2008) Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:703.e1–703.e7CrossRef Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, McAchran SE, Goldman HB, Jelovsek JE (2008) Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:703.e1–703.e7CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Margulies RU, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, McGuire EJ, Clemens JQ, DeLancy JOL (2008) Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:678.e1–678.e4CrossRef Margulies RU, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, McGuire EJ, Clemens JQ, DeLancy JOL (2008) Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:678.e1–678.e4CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, management. Obstet Gynecol 115:325–330PubMedCrossRef Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, management. Obstet Gynecol 115:325–330PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Skala C, Renezeder K, Albrich S, Puhl A, Laterza RM, Naumann G, Koelbl H (2011) The IUGA/ICS classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion. Int Urogynecol J 22:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef Skala C, Renezeder K, Albrich S, Puhl A, Laterza RM, Naumann G, Koelbl H (2011) The IUGA/ICS classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion. Int Urogynecol J 22:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short-term surgical outcomes and characteristics of patients with mesh complications from pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery
Authors
Jessica Hammett
Ann Peters
Elisa Trowbridge
Kathie Hullfish
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2227-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014 Go to the issue