Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

Surgical preparation: are patients “ready” for stress urinary incontinence surgery?

Authors: L. Brubaker, H. J. Litman, L. Rickey, K. Y. Dyer, A. D. Markland, L. Sirls, P. Norton, E. Casiano, M. F. R. Paraiso, C. Ghetti, D. D. Rahn, J. W. Kusek

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Patient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life.

Methods

The ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment’s effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ).

Results

Based on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 %) of women reported they “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r = 0.13, p = 0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (r s = 0.11, p = 0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p = 0.008).

Conclusions

Approximately half (48 %) of women “strongly agreed” that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD (2004) Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:201–205PubMedCrossRef Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD (2004) Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:201–205PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L (2007) Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:654.e1–654.e6 Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L (2007) Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:654.e1–654.e6
3.
go back to reference Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 189:1551–1557 Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 189:1551–1557
4.
go back to reference Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L (2006) Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:722–728PubMedCrossRef Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L (2006) Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:722–728PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nager CW, Brubaker L, Daneshgari F, Litman HJ, Dandreo KJ, Sirls L et al (2009) Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: a non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials 30:531–539PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Brubaker L, Daneshgari F, Litman HJ, Dandreo KJ, Sirls L et al (2009) Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: a non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials 30:531–539PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C et al (2012) A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 366:1987–1997PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C et al (2012) A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 366:1987–1997PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Trabuco EC, Klingele CJ, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Lightner DJ, Gebhart JB (2011) Preoperative and postoperative predictors of satisfaction after surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 204:444.e1–444.e6 Trabuco EC, Klingele CJ, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Lightner DJ, Gebhart JB (2011) Preoperative and postoperative predictors of satisfaction after surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 204:444.e1–444.e6
8.
go back to reference Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery. BJOG 117:1504–1511PubMedCrossRef Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery. BJOG 117:1504–1511PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, Hunt G, Meltzer D, Slutsky JR et al (2013) How the patient-centered outcomes research institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Heal Aff (Millford) 32:393–400CrossRef Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, Hunt G, Meltzer D, Slutsky JR et al (2013) How the patient-centered outcomes research institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Heal Aff (Millford) 32:393–400CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pham T, Kenton K, Mueller E, Brubaker L (2009) New pelvic symptoms are common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:88.e1–88.e5CrossRef Pham T, Kenton K, Mueller E, Brubaker L (2009) New pelvic symptoms are common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:88.e1–88.e5CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Richter HE, Diokno A, Kenton K, Norton P, Albo M, Kraus S et al (2008) Predictors of treatment failure 24 months after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 179:1024–1030PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Richter HE, Diokno A, Kenton K, Norton P, Albo M, Kraus S et al (2008) Predictors of treatment failure 24 months after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 179:1024–1030PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Crabtree TD, Puri V, Bell JM, Bontumasi N, Patterson GA, Kreisel D et al (2012) Outcomes and perception of lung surgery with implementation of a patient video education module: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Surg 214:816–821.e2PubMedCrossRef Crabtree TD, Puri V, Bell JM, Bontumasi N, Patterson GA, Kreisel D et al (2012) Outcomes and perception of lung surgery with implementation of a patient video education module: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Surg 214:816–821.e2PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pager C (2005) Randomised controlled trial of preoperative information satisfaction with cataract surgery. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 89:10–13 Pager C (2005) Randomised controlled trial of preoperative information satisfaction with cataract surgery. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 89:10–13
Metadata
Title
Surgical preparation: are patients “ready” for stress urinary incontinence surgery?
Authors
L. Brubaker
H. J. Litman
L. Rickey
K. Y. Dyer
A. D. Markland
L. Sirls
P. Norton
E. Casiano
M. F. R. Paraiso
C. Ghetti
D. D. Rahn
J. W. Kusek
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2014 Go to the issue