Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-01-2014 | Original Article

High risk of complications with a single incision pelvic floor repair kit: results of a retrospective case series

Authors: Stephen T. Jeffery, Kendall Brouard

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2014

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the extent and severity of the post-operative complications associated with the Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit.

Methods

This is a descriptive analysis of 23 consecutive women who had a prolapse repair with either an anterior (n = 19) or posterior (n = 4) Pinnacle kit. The clinical records of all these patients were available for analysis. Pre-operative data and intra-operative complications were noted. All post-operative complications and repeat surgical interventions were recorded. In addition to pelvic floor symptoms, we looked specifically for pelvic pain and mesh contraction, exposure, extrusion or erosion. Complications were classified according to the joint IUGA/ICS system.

Results

Seventy percent (n = 16) of our cohort experienced at least one complication. All, except one, were following an anterior Pinnacle. 10 patients (43 %) had a tender vaginal mesh prominence, including a contraction band anteriorly or at the vaginal apex. Six (26 %) complained of associated buttock, groin or vaginal pain, while the tenderness was only detected during vaginal examination in 4 (16 %) patients. Three (13 %) patients required vaginal mesh excision for severe pain and one required a second procedure. Three patients (13 %) had vaginal mesh exposure and 8 (35 %) developed de novo stress incontinence. Two patients (8 %) developed symptomatic recurrent prolapse, one following mesh excision owing to large mesh exposure. Another patient had an anterior compartment prolapse above and below a tender contracted anterior vaginal mesh.

Conclusions

The Pinnacle kit was associated with a high incidence of post-operative complications in this small series.

US Food and Drug Administration (2011) FDA Safety Communication: Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Accessed 13 July 2011

Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826–1836PubMedCrossRef

Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2011) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(1):86.e1–86.e9

Julian TM (1996) The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1472–1475PubMedCrossRef

Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO (2009) A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. J Biomech 42(10):1371–1377PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Rane A, Kannan K, Barry C, Balakrishnan S, Lim Y, Corstiaans A (2008) Prospective study of the Perigee system for the management of cystocoeles–medium-term follow up. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(4):427–432PubMedCrossRef

Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2012) Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):85-91PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Cayrac M, Letouzey V, Ouzaid I, Costa P, Delmas V, de Tayrac R (2012) Anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle device: an anatomical study. Int Urogynecol J 23(3):335–340PubMedCrossRef

Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Statistical evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):1070–1072PubMedCrossRef

10.

Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22(1):3–15PubMedCrossRef

11.

Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2.1):367–373PubMed

12.

Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P (2010) Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(4):423–430CrossRef

13.

Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116(1):15–24PubMedCrossRef

14.

Muffly TM, Barber MD (2010) Insertion and removal of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53(1):99–114CrossRef

15.

Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol 115(2.1):325–330PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hurtado EA, Appell RA (2009) Management of complications arising from transvaginal mesh kit procedures: a tertiary referral center’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(1):11–17PubMedCrossRef

17.

Aungst MJ, Friedman EB, von Pechmann WS, Horbach NS, Welgoss JA (2009) De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):73.e1–7CrossRef

18.

Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME (2012) Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 119(3):354–360PubMedCrossRef

19.

Tijdink MM, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JP, Withagen MI (2011) Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J 22(11):1395–1404PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

20.

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 14(4):CD004014

21.

Vu MK, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H, Goldberg RP (2012) Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23(12):1753–1761PubMedCrossRef

22.

Rivaux G, Fatton B, Letouzey V, Cayrac M, Boileau L, de Tayrac R (2012) Utero-vaginal suspension using a bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh. Preliminary results. Prog Urol 22(17):1077–1083PubMedCrossRef

Title: High risk of complications with a single incision pelvic floor repair kit: results of a retrospective case series
Authors: Stephen T. Jeffery
Kendall Brouard
Publication date: 01-01-2014
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2156-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

High risk of complications with a single incision pelvic floor repair kit: results of a retrospective case series

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Obturator neuropathy: an adverse outcome of a trans-obturator vaginal mesh to repair pelvic organ prolapse

Incidence of female urethral diverticulum: a population-based analysis and literature review

Perineal trauma in women undergoing vaginal delivery following intra-uterine fetal demise: a case–control analysis

Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse

Risk factors for urinary incontinence 1 year after the first vaginal delivery in a cohort of primiparous Danish women

Ethnicity and variations of pelvic organ prolapse bother