Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Understanding women’s experiences of electronic interviewing during the clinical episode in urogynaecology: a qualitative study

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Questionnaires for assessing health and related quality of life are increasingly advocated but little is known about women’s views on them. The aim of the study was to understand women’s experiences of using an electronic personal assessment questionnaire for pelvic floor disorders (ePAQ-PF) during the clinical episode.

Methods

A qualitative study was performed in a tertiary referral centre for urogynaecology. Women who completed the electronic questionnaire (ePAQ-PF) before and after intervention for pelvic floor disorders were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 20 women and the transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach to identify themes and categories. The main outcome measures were: (1) women’s feelings about their experience of using the questionnaire and the impact it had on their clinical episode, (2) exploration of ways in which the questionnaire influenced communication, (3) influence of the questionnaire on anxiety and expectations relating to clinical care and (4) women’s feelings about how the use of the questionnaire has affected their health and well-being.

Results

Qualitative analysis identified eight themes relating to the burden and the benefit of questionnaire use with ‘benefit’ being the dominant theme. Women felt that the questionnaire improved their understanding of their condition, improved communication with clinicians and helped prepare them for clinical consultations, generally finding it relevant, easy and enjoyable to complete. Some women commented on the burden of questionnaire use and expressed concerns about its length and that it's closed multiple choice format was restrictive.

Conclusions

The identified principal themes of enhanced communication and preparedness for clinical consultation provided by the questionnaire appeared to support improved focus and insight, which in turn contributed to the setting of realistic expectations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Bosch R, Gotoh M, Jackson S, Naughton M, Radley S, Valiquette L (2005) Symptom and quality of life assessment. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 519–584 Donovan JL, Bosch R, Gotoh M, Jackson S, Naughton M, Radley S, Valiquette L (2005) Symptom and quality of life assessment. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 519–584
3.
go back to reference Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R (2006) Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 12:559–568PubMedCrossRef Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R (2006) Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 12:559–568PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Higginson IJ, Carr AJ (2001) Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 322:1297–1300PubMedCrossRef Higginson IJ, Carr AJ (2001) Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 322:1297–1300PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomi A, Schoenfeld P (2001) A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care 39(2):181–189PubMedCrossRef Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomi A, Schoenfeld P (2001) A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care 39(2):181–189PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7(6):513–519PubMedCrossRef Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7(6):513–519PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hess R, Santucci A, McTigue K, Fischer G, Kapoor W (2008) Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 23:476–480PubMedCrossRef Hess R, Santucci A, McTigue K, Fischer G, Kapoor W (2008) Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 23:476–480PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Radley SC, Jones GL, Tanguy EA, Stevens VG, Nelson C, Mathers NJ (2006) Computer interviewing in urogynaecology: concept, development and psychometric testing of an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire in primary and secondary care. BJOG 113:231–238PubMedCrossRef Radley SC, Jones GL, Tanguy EA, Stevens VG, Nelson C, Mathers NJ (2006) Computer interviewing in urogynaecology: concept, development and psychometric testing of an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire in primary and secondary care. BJOG 113:231–238PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones GL, Radley SC, Lumb J, Jha S (2008) Electronic pelvic floor symptoms assessment: test of data quality of ePAQ-PF. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1337–1347PubMedCrossRef Jones GL, Radley SC, Lumb J, Jha S (2008) Electronic pelvic floor symptoms assessment: test of data quality of ePAQ-PF. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1337–1347PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marshall C, Rossman GB (1999) Designing qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks Marshall C, Rossman GB (1999) Designing qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
12.
go back to reference Woodend AK, Nair RC, Tang AS (1997) Definition of life quality from a patient versus health care professional perspective. Int J Rehabil Res 20:71–80PubMedCrossRef Woodend AK, Nair RC, Tang AS (1997) Definition of life quality from a patient versus health care professional perspective. Int J Rehabil Res 20:71–80PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Petterson KI, Veenstra M, Guldvog G, Kolstad A (2004) The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: development, validity and reliability. Int J Qual Health Care 16(6):453–463CrossRef Petterson KI, Veenstra M, Guldvog G, Kolstad A (2004) The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: development, validity and reliability. Int J Qual Health Care 16(6):453–463CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208PubMedCrossRef Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320:50–52PubMedCrossRef Mays N, Pope C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320:50–52PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Porter S (2000) Qualitative research. In: Cormack D (ed) The research process in nursing. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 141–151 Porter S (2000) Qualitative research. In: Cormack D (ed) The research process in nursing. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 141–151
19.
go back to reference Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146(3):435–443PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146(3):435–443PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding women’s experiences of electronic interviewing during the clinical episode in urogynaecology: a qualitative study
Publication date
01-11-2013
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2132-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2013 Go to the issue

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest

POP Surgery Review

Apical prolapse