Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Article

The cube pessary: an underestimated treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse? Subjective 1-year outcomes

Authors: Zoltan Nemeth, Sándor Nagy, Johannes Ott

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition. The use of pessaries for conservative management of POP is widespread. However, there are little data on the use of cube pessaries. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether self-therapy with the use of vaginal cube pessaries in women with POP can be a well-tolerated, first-line treatment.

Methods

In a prospective case series, 87 women who suffered from symptomatic POP, stages II–IV, were instructed in self-treatment with a vaginal cube pessary. Differences were analyzed using Wilcoxon’s rank sum test or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

A pessary could be fitted in 84/87 patients (96.6 %); 6 women were lost to follow-up. The remaining 78 patients (92.9 %, median age 60 years) completed the study. Sixteen women (20.5 %) chose not to continue with the pessary treatment. For these patients, general well-being decreased from a median numeric rating score (NRS) of 4.5 (3–6) to 2.0 (1–3, p < 0.001). In those who continued treatment, general well-being increased from a median NRS of 3.0 (2–5) to 8.0 (7–10, p < 0.001) after 1 year of use. The majority of patients (53) in the present study rated pessary self-care use as “very easy” or “easy” (85.5 %). The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) was 2.0 (1–3) at follow-up examination. There were no complications or adverse effects of pessary use.

Conclusions

Conservative self-treatment with vaginal cube pessaries might be a feasible treatment option for women who suffer from POP.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Machin SE, Mukhopadhyay S (2011) Pelvic organ prolapse: review of the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management. Menopause Int 17:132–136PubMedCrossRef Machin SE, Mukhopadhyay S (2011) Pelvic organ prolapse: review of the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management. Menopause Int 17:132–136PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1157–1161PubMedCrossRef Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1157–1161PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oliver R, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2011) The history and usage of the vaginal pessary: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:125–130PubMedCrossRef Oliver R, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2011) The history and usage of the vaginal pessary: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:125–130PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addison WA (2000) A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol 95:931–935PubMedCrossRef Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addison WA (2000) A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol 95:931–935PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46:205–208PubMed Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46:205–208PubMed
8.
go back to reference Handa VL, Jones M (2002) Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:349–352PubMedCrossRef Handa VL, Jones M (2002) Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:349–352PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adams E, Thomson A, Maher C, Hagen S (2004) Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004010PubMed Adams E, Thomson A, Maher C, Hagen S (2004) Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004010PubMed
10.
go back to reference Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Rode MA, Craig EC, Gallegos KA, Montoya AR, Swartz CD (2007) Pelvic floor symptom changes in pessary users. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:620.e1–620.e6CrossRef Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Rode MA, Craig EC, Gallegos KA, Montoya AR, Swartz CD (2007) Pelvic floor symptom changes in pessary users. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:620.e1–620.e6CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G (2011) A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 114:56–59PubMedCrossRef Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G (2011) A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 114:56–59PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW (2006) Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 108:93–99PubMedCrossRef Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW (2006) Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 108:93–99PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Atnip SD (2009) Pessary use and management for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 36:541–563PubMedCrossRef Atnip SD (2009) Pessary use and management for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 36:541–563PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20PubMed Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20PubMed
16.
go back to reference Bai SW, Yoon BS, Kwon JY, Shin JS, Kim SK, Park KH (2005) Survey of the characteristics and satisfaction degree of the patients using a pessary. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:182–186PubMedCrossRef Bai SW, Yoon BS, Kwon JY, Shin JS, Kim SK, Park KH (2005) Survey of the characteristics and satisfaction degree of the patients using a pessary. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:182–186PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1025–1029PubMedCrossRef Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1025–1029PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21:523–528PubMedCrossRef Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21:523–528PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL (2011) Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review. Int Urogynecol J 22:637–644PubMedCrossRef Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL (2011) Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review. Int Urogynecol J 22:637–644PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nager CW, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Paraiso MF, Wu JM, Kenton K, Atnip SD, Spino C, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) (2009) Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Paraiso MF, Wu JM, Kenton K, Atnip SD, Spino C, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) (2009) Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, Danner KA, Rogers RG (2006) Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse-midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health 51:78–84PubMedCrossRef Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, Danner KA, Rogers RG (2006) Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse-midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health 51:78–84PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94PubMedCrossRef Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS (2011) Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:273–278PubMedCrossRef Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS (2011) Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:273–278PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116:1715–1721PubMedCrossRef Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116:1715–1721PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kuhn A, Bapst D, Stadlmayr W, Vits K, Mueller MD (2009) Sexual and organ function in patients with symptomatic prolapse: are pessaries helpful? Fertil Steril 91:1914–1918PubMedCrossRef Kuhn A, Bapst D, Stadlmayr W, Vits K, Mueller MD (2009) Sexual and organ function in patients with symptomatic prolapse: are pessaries helpful? Fertil Steril 91:1914–1918PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nemeth Z, Ott J (2011) Complete recovery of severe postpartum genital prolapse after conservative treatment—a case report. Int Urogynecol J 22:1467–1469PubMedCrossRef Nemeth Z, Ott J (2011) Complete recovery of severe postpartum genital prolapse after conservative treatment—a case report. Int Urogynecol J 22:1467–1469PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jones K, Yang L, Lowder JL, Meyn L, Ellison R, Zyczynski HM, Moalli P, Lee T (2008) Effect of pessary use on genital hiatus measurements in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 112:630–636PubMedCrossRef Jones K, Yang L, Lowder JL, Meyn L, Ellison R, Zyczynski HM, Moalli P, Lee T (2008) Effect of pessary use on genital hiatus measurements in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 112:630–636PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The cube pessary: an underestimated treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse? Subjective 1-year outcomes
Authors
Zoltan Nemeth
Sándor Nagy
Johannes Ott
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2093-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2013 Go to the issue