Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Article

Implant infection after two-stage sacral nerve stimulator placement

Authors: Blair B. Washington, Brian J. Hines

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

To report our experience with implant infection after two-stage sacral nerve stimulator placement. We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent implantation with a sacral nerve stimulator for the management of refractory cases of urge urinary incontinence, urinary frequency, and non-obstructive urinary retention. Baseline demographic data, interval to the development of infection, and the organism cultured are reported. After stage II neurostimulator placement, 5 out of 37 (13.5%) women required device removal for culture positive wound infections. Patients returned an average of 147.4 days after device implantation with evidence of infection. Infection occurred a minimum of 33 days, a median of 76 days, and a maximum of 461 days after sacral nerve stimulator implantation. The most common pathogen cultured was Staphylococcus aureus. After device removal, all patients resolved their infections. Two patients underwent uncomplicated reimplantation in the contralateral buttock 14 and 16 days after stimulator removal. The risk of infection after tined lead pretest and neurostimulator placement may be higher than previously observed in older techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB et al (1998) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 165:15–19CrossRef Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB et al (1998) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 165:15–19CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hijaz A, Vasavada S (2005) Complications and troubleshooting of the sacral neuromodulation therapy. Urol Clin North Am 32:65–69PubMedCrossRef Hijaz A, Vasavada S (2005) Complications and troubleshooting of the sacral neuromodulation therapy. Urol Clin North Am 32:65–69PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Fowler CJ et al (2003) The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence. BJU Int 91:355–359PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Fowler CJ et al (2003) The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence. BJU Int 91:355–359PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A (2005) Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. Urology 65:1096–1098PubMedCrossRef Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A (2005) Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. Urology 65:1096–1098PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lauwers S, de Smet F (1998) Surgical site infections. Acta Clin Belg 53:303–310PubMed Lauwers S, de Smet F (1998) Surgical site infections. Acta Clin Belg 53:303–310PubMed
Metadata
Title
Implant infection after two-stage sacral nerve stimulator placement
Authors
Blair B. Washington
Brian J. Hines
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0386-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

International Urogynecology Journal 12/2007 Go to the issue