Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hilton P (2007) Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:3–11PubMed Hilton P (2007) Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:3–11PubMed
2.
go back to reference Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Flack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A (2006) Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract 61(Suppl 152):1–26CrossRef Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Flack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A (2006) Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract 61(Suppl 152):1–26CrossRef
3.
4.
5.
go back to reference House of Commons Health Committee (2005) The influence of the pharmaceutical industry, HC 42-1. The Stationery Office, London House of Commons Health Committee (2005) The influence of the pharmaceutical industry, HC 42-1. The Stationery Office, London
6.
go back to reference Gøtzsche P, Hróbjartsson A, Johansen H, Haahr M, Altman D, Chan A-W (2007) Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLoS Med 4(1):e19PubMedCrossRef Gøtzsche P, Hróbjartsson A, Johansen H, Haahr M, Altman D, Chan A-W (2007) Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLoS Med 4(1):e19PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession: reply to C. Chapple
Author
Paul Hilton
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0339-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2007 Go to the issue