Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2004

01-08-2004 | Original Article

Comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers

Authors: Andrew F. Hundley, Anthony G. Visco

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare pressure readings obtained with catheter-mounted microtip and external water pressure transducers using a mechanical model for vesical pressure during Valsalva straining and coughing. The two catheter-mounted pressure transducers were simultaneously placed in a vinyl IV bag designed to mimic the parameters of the human bladder to allow comparison of simultaneous readings from both transducers. Simulated cough and Valsalva maneuvers of various strengths at different volumes (100 ml, 200 ml, 300 ml) were performed and the pressure readings generated by the two systems compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the systems was 0.998 for coughs and 0.998 for Valsalva efforts. Data were also analyzed by volume and strength of simulated cough and Valsalva effort, and correlations were found to be high (≥0.940) for all subgroup analyses. Mean absolute differences between events recorded by the two systems were small, as indicated by the y-intercept of 3.76 cmH2O pressure. Neither transducer recorded consistently higher pressures than the other. We concluded that there is a high correlation between pressure measurements obtained from microtip and external water pressure transducers during simulated cough and Valsalva efforts in this model. As similar correlation should exist in vivo, urodynamic data generated by the two transducer types should be comparable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:116–126 Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:116–126
2.
go back to reference Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK (1995) Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:551–557PubMed Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK (1995) Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:551–557PubMed
3.
go back to reference Swift SE, Utrie JW (1996) The need for standardization of the valsalva leak-point pressure. Int Urogynecol J 7:227–230 Swift SE, Utrie JW (1996) The need for standardization of the valsalva leak-point pressure. Int Urogynecol J 7:227–230
4.
go back to reference Swift SE, Yoon EA (1999) Test–retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 94:99–102CrossRefPubMed Swift SE, Yoon EA (1999) Test–retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 94:99–102CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Miklos JR, Sze EH, Karram MM (1995) A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leak-point pressures in women with stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86:349–352CrossRefPubMed Miklos JR, Sze EH, Karram MM (1995) A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leak-point pressures in women with stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86:349–352CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR (1987) The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol 69:399–402 Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR (1987) The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol 69:399–402
7.
go back to reference Hilton P, Stanton SL (1983) Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:919–933PubMed Hilton P, Stanton SL (1983) Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:919–933PubMed
8.
go back to reference McGuire EJ (1981) Urodynamic findings in patients after failure of stress incontinence operations. Prog Clin Biol Res 78:351–360PubMed McGuire EJ (1981) Urodynamic findings in patients after failure of stress incontinence operations. Prog Clin Biol Res 78:351–360PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wang AC, Chen MC (2002) A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:322–326 Wang AC, Chen MC (2002) A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:322–326
10.
go back to reference Rowan D, James ED, Kramer AE, Sterling AM, Suhel PF (1987) Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. Produced by the International Continence Society Working Party on Urodynamic Equipment. J Med Eng Technol 11:57–64PubMed Rowan D, James ED, Kramer AE, Sterling AM, Suhel PF (1987) Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. Produced by the International Continence Society Working Party on Urodynamic Equipment. J Med Eng Technol 11:57–64PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers
Authors
Andrew F. Hundley
Anthony G. Visco
Publication date
01-08-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1157-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2004

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2004 Go to the issue