Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Knee-TEP | KNEE

Comparable clinical outcome and implant longevity after CT- or MRI-based patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of a RCT

Authors: Elke Thijs, Dieuwertje Theeuwen, Bert Boonen, Emil van Haaren, Roel Hendrickx, Rein Vos, Rob Borghans, Nanne Kort, Martijn G. M. Schotanus

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-specific instruments (PSI) are already widespread used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Either computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used pre-operatively to create jigs to guide resection during surgery. This study is a sequel of previous work that showed significantly more radiological outliers for posterior slope when CT-based guides were used. The aim of this study was to assess differences in revision rate and clinical outcome between the two groups at 2-year follow-up.

Methods

At the 2-year follow-up, 124 patients were analysed in this prospective, randomised single-blind study. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. Patients fulfilled four patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Scores on the questionnaires were compared between both groups at the different follow-up visits.

Results

At final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the survival rates of the CT- and MRI-based PSI surgery. Postoperatively, the PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the pre-operative values. There were no significant differences for the PROMs between both groups at the 2-years follow-up.

Conclusions

Although previous results showed more outliers regarding posterior slope for CT-based PSIs, no difference in revision rate or the outcome of PROMs was found at 2-year follow-up. Further research to determine what the influence is of radiological outliers on implant survival and clinical outcomes is necessary.

Level of evidence

I.
Literature
1.
go back to reference An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K et al (2017) Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci 22(1):116–120CrossRef An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K et al (2017) Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci 22(1):116–120CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asada S, Mori S, Matsushita T et al (2014) Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(6):1238–1243CrossRef Asada S, Mori S, Matsushita T et al (2014) Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(6):1238–1243CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B et al (2013) Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2206–2212CrossRef Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B et al (2013) Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2206–2212CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kerens B et al (2016) No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented TKA at 2 years follow-up: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 98-B(7):939–944CrossRef Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kerens B et al (2016) No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented TKA at 2 years follow-up: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 98-B(7):939–944CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72CrossRef Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chang MJ, Lim H, Lee NR, Moon YW (2014) Diagnosis, causes and treatments of instability following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 26(2):61–67CrossRef Chang MJ, Lim H, Lee NR, Moon YW (2014) Diagnosis, causes and treatments of instability following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 26(2):61–67CrossRef
7.
go back to reference DeSouza CM, Legedza AT, Sankoh AJ (2009) An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 19(6):1055–1073CrossRef DeSouza CM, Legedza AT, Sankoh AJ (2009) An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 19(6):1055–1073CrossRef
8.
go back to reference EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208CrossRef EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Frye BM, Naijm AA, Adams JB et al (2015) MRI is more accurate that CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. Knee 22(6):609–612CrossRef Frye BM, Naijm AA, Adams JB et al (2015) MRI is more accurate that CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. Knee 22(6):609–612CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Giesinger K, Hamilton DF, Jost B et al (2014) Comparative responsiveness of 171 outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(2):184–189CrossRef Giesinger K, Hamilton DF, Jost B et al (2014) Comparative responsiveness of 171 outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(2):184–189CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG et al (2014) What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? An overview of the literature. Acta Orthop 85(5):480–487CrossRef Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG et al (2014) What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? An overview of the literature. Acta Orthop 85(5):480–487CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN et al (2005) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76(3):347–352CrossRef Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN et al (2005) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76(3):347–352CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385CrossRef Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PF et al (2006) The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ 15(10):1121–1132CrossRef Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PF et al (2006) The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ 15(10):1121–1132CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Stegeman TJ et al (2012) Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up. Int Orthop 36(9):1835–1839CrossRef Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Stegeman TJ et al (2012) Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up. Int Orthop 36(9):1835–1839CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calo M et al (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med 4(7):126CrossRef Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calo M et al (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med 4(7):126CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014CrossRef Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nam D, Park A, Stambough JB et al (2016) Custom cutting guides do not improve total knee arthroplasty clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):40–46CrossRef Nam D, Park A, Stambough JB et al (2016) Custom cutting guides do not improve total knee arthroplasty clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):40–46CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL et al (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):895–902CrossRef Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL et al (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):895–902CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T et al (2013) Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2213–2219CrossRef Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T et al (2013) Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2213–2219CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pfitzner T, Abdel MP, von Roth P et al (2014) Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific intruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(10):2913–2922CrossRef Pfitzner T, Abdel MP, von Roth P et al (2014) Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific intruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(10):2913–2922CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S et al (2013) Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3988–3995CrossRef Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S et al (2013) Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3988–3995CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schotanus MG, Sollie R, van Haaren EH, Hendrickx RP et al (2016) A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 98-B(6):786–792CrossRef Schotanus MG, Sollie R, van Haaren EH, Hendrickx RP et al (2016) A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 98-B(6):786–792CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schotanus MGM, Thijs E, Heijmans M et al (2018) Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(9):2659–2668CrossRef Schotanus MGM, Thijs E, Heijmans M et al (2018) Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(9):2659–2668CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schotanus MGM, Boonen B, van der Weegen W et al (2019) No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1463–1468CrossRef Schotanus MGM, Boonen B, van der Weegen W et al (2019) No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1463–1468CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Silva A, Pinto E, Sampaio R (2016) Rotational alignment in patient-specific instrumentation in TKA: MRI or CT? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3648–3652CrossRef Silva A, Pinto E, Sampaio R (2016) Rotational alignment in patient-specific instrumentation in TKA: MRI or CT? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3648–3652CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY et al (2013) Restorating the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximize post-operative flexion I posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Bone Jt J 95-B(10):1354–1358CrossRef Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY et al (2013) Restorating the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximize post-operative flexion I posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Bone Jt J 95-B(10):1354–1358CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H et al (2014) Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(1):263–271CrossRef Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H et al (2014) Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(1):263–271CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wu XD, Xiang BY, Schotanus MGM et al (2017) CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 15(6):336–348CrossRef Wu XD, Xiang BY, Schotanus MGM et al (2017) CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 15(6):336–348CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zhang QM, Chen JY, Li H et al (2015) No evidence of superiority in reducing outliers of component alignment for patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 7(1):19–25CrossRef Zhang QM, Chen JY, Li H et al (2015) No evidence of superiority in reducing outliers of component alignment for patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 7(1):19–25CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A et al (2017) No difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(1):9–20CrossRef Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A et al (2017) No difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(1):9–20CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparable clinical outcome and implant longevity after CT- or MRI-based patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of a RCT
Authors
Elke Thijs
Dieuwertje Theeuwen
Bert Boonen
Emil van Haaren
Roel Hendrickx
Rein Vos
Rob Borghans
Nanne Kort
Martijn G. M. Schotanus
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05616-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2020 Go to the issue