Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2019

01-05-2019 | KNEE

Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population

Authors: Yong-Gon Koh, Ji-Hoon Nam, Hyun-Seok Chung, Ho-Joong Kim, Heoung-Jae Chun, Kyoung-Tak Kang

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the morphometric data from magnetic resonance images of arthritic knees in Korean adults, and to identify the existence of morphological differences of femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) between genders.

Methods

The differences in anthropometric PCO data in 975 patients (825 female and 150 male) were evaluated. The distances from the anterior and posterior femoral shaft cortex line to the most posterior femoral condyle tangent line were defined as the anterior–posterior dimension (AP) and the PCO. The PCO ratio (PCOR) was calculated as PCO/AP.

Results

The medial PCO was greater than the lateral PCO (26.3 ± 2.2 vs. 24.3 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.01). This difference was observed in both female patients (medial: 26.2 ± 2.2 mm vs. lateral: 24.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.01) and male patients (medial: 26.8 ± 2.3 mm vs. lateral: 24.8 ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.01). The medial and lateral PCO values were also greater in male patients than in female ones (p < 0.01). In contrast, PCOR was greater in female patients than in male ones, both in the medial and lateral femoral condyles (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

It was shown that medial and lateral PCO and PCOR were asymmetric, and that there was gender difference in Korean population in our study. In addition, our data showed that the PCOR of contemporary TKAs may be small for Asian patients that may not be sufficient to meet the needs of the Korean patient population. These results confirm that a gender-specific femoral component design is necessary to recreate the PCO for male and female Asian populations.

Level of evidence

Non-consecutive patients, Level III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barnes CL, Iwaki H, Minoda Y, Green JM IInd, Obert RM (2010) Analysis of sex and race and the size and shape of the distal femur using virtual surgery and archived computed tomography images. J Surg Orthop Adv 19:200–208PubMed Barnes CL, Iwaki H, Minoda Y, Green JM IInd, Obert RM (2010) Analysis of sex and race and the size and shape of the distal femur using virtual surgery and archived computed tomography images. J Surg Orthop Adv 19:200–208PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:50–53CrossRef Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:50–53CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR, Postacchini R, Masciangelo R, Giannicola G (2012) Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J Anat 221:452–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR, Postacchini R, Masciangelo R, Giannicola G (2012) Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J Anat 221:452–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Clarke HD, Scott WN, Insall JN (2001) Anatomy. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, 1, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 13 Clarke HD, Scott WN, Insall JN (2001) Anatomy. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, 1, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 13
5.
go back to reference Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Burnett R (2014) A technique of predicting radiographic joint line and posterior femoral condylar offset of the knee. Arthritis 2014:121069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Burnett R (2014) A technique of predicting radiographic joint line and posterior femoral condylar offset of the knee. Arthritis 2014:121069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Han H, Oh S, Chang CB, Kang SB (2016) Anthropometric difference of the knee on MRI according to gender and age groups. Surg Radiol Anat 38:203–211CrossRefPubMed Han H, Oh S, Chang CB, Kang SB (2016) Anthropometric difference of the knee on MRI according to gender and age groups. Surg Radiol Anat 38:203–211CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Han H, Oh S, Chang CB, Kang SB (2016) Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2483–2488CrossRefPubMed Han H, Oh S, Chang CB, Kang SB (2016) Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2483–2488CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hanratty BM, Thompson NW, Wilson RK, Beverland DE (2007) The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:915–918CrossRef Hanratty BM, Thompson NW, Wilson RK, Beverland DE (2007) The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:915–918CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Ishii H, Toyabe S (2011) Changes in the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:255–259CrossRefPubMed Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Ishii H, Toyabe S (2011) Changes in the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:255–259CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Johal P, Hassaballa MA, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ (2012) The posterior condylar offset ratio. Knee 19:843–845CrossRefPubMed Johal P, Hassaballa MA, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ (2012) The posterior condylar offset ratio. Knee 19:843–845CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kamath AF, Horneff JG, Gaffney V, Israelite CL, Nelson CL (2010) Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3355–3361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kamath AF, Horneff JG, Gaffney V, Israelite CL, Nelson CL (2010) Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3355–3361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Kang KT, Kim SH, Son J, Lee YH, Kim S, Chun HJ (2017) Probabilistic evaluation of the material properties of the in vivo subject-specific articular surface using a computational model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:1390–1400CrossRefPubMed Kang KT, Kim SH, Son J, Lee YH, Kim S, Chun HJ (2017) Probabilistic evaluation of the material properties of the in vivo subject-specific articular surface using a computational model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:1390–1400CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kang KT, Koh YG, Son J, Kwon OR, Lee JS, Kwon SK (2018) A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Res 7:69–78CrossRef Kang KT, Koh YG, Son J, Kwon OR, Lee JS, Kwon SK (2018) A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Res 7:69–78CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kang KT, Son J, Kwon OR, Baek C, Heo DB, Park KM, Kim HJ, Koh YG (2016) Morphometry of femoral rotation for total knee prosthesis according to gender in a Korean population using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Knee 23:975–980CrossRefPubMed Kang KT, Son J, Kwon OR, Baek C, Heo DB, Park KM, Kim HJ, Koh YG (2016) Morphometry of femoral rotation for total knee prosthesis according to gender in a Korean population using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Knee 23:975–980CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kang KT, Son J, Kwon OR, Baek C, Heo DB, Park KM, Kim HJ, Koh YG (2017) Effects of measurement methods for tibial rotation axis on the morphometry in Korean populations by gender. Knee 24:23–30CrossRefPubMed Kang KT, Son J, Kwon OR, Baek C, Heo DB, Park KM, Kim HJ, Koh YG (2017) Effects of measurement methods for tibial rotation axis on the morphometry in Korean populations by gender. Knee 24:23–30CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kapoor A, Mishra SK, Dewangan SK, Mody BS (2008) Range of movements of lower limb joints in cross-legged sitting posture. J Arthroplasty 23:451–453CrossRefPubMed Kapoor A, Mishra SK, Dewangan SK, Mody BS (2008) Range of movements of lower limb joints in cross-legged sitting posture. J Arthroplasty 23:451–453CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1470–1475CrossRef Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1470–1475CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A (2006) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:395–402CrossRef Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A (2006) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:395–402CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Li K, Langdale E, Tashman S, Harner C, Zhang X (2012) Gender and condylar differences in distal femur morphometry clarified by automated computer analyses. J Orthop Res 30:686–692CrossRefPubMed Li K, Langdale E, Tashman S, Harner C, Zhang X (2012) Gender and condylar differences in distal femur morphometry clarified by automated computer analyses. J Orthop Res 30:686–692CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ma QL, Lipman JD, Cheng CK, Wang XN, Zhang YY, You B (2017) A comparison between Chinese and Caucasian 3-dimensional bony morphometry in presimulated and postsimulated osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2878–2886CrossRefPubMed Ma QL, Lipman JD, Cheng CK, Wang XN, Zhang YY, You B (2017) A comparison between Chinese and Caucasian 3-dimensional bony morphometry in presimulated and postsimulated osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2878–2886CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mahfouz M, Abdel Fatah EE, Bowers LS, Scuderi G (2012) Three-dimensional morphology of the knee reveals ethnic differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:172–185CrossRefPubMed Mahfouz M, Abdel Fatah EE, Bowers LS, Scuderi G (2012) Three-dimensional morphology of the knee reveals ethnic differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:172–185CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Massin P, Gournay A (2006) Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:889–896CrossRefPubMed Massin P, Gournay A (2006) Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:889–896CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:895–902CrossRefPubMed Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:895–902CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Onodera T, Majima T, Nishiike O, Kasahara Y, Takahashi D (2013) Posterior femoral condylar offset after total knee replacement in the risk of knee flexion contracture. J Arthroplasty 28:1112–1116CrossRefPubMed Onodera T, Majima T, Nishiike O, Kasahara Y, Takahashi D (2013) Posterior femoral condylar offset after total knee replacement in the risk of knee flexion contracture. J Arthroplasty 28:1112–1116CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Kawahara S, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y (2012) Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1463–1469CrossRefPubMed Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Kawahara S, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y (2012) Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1463–1469CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Terzidis I, Totlis T, Papathanasiou E, Sideridis A, Vlasis K, Natsis K (2012) Gender and side-to-side differences of femoral condyles morphology: osteometric data from 360 Caucasian dried femori. Anat Res Int 2012:679658PubMedPubMedCentral Terzidis I, Totlis T, Papathanasiou E, Sideridis A, Vlasis K, Natsis K (2012) Gender and side-to-side differences of femoral condyles morphology: osteometric data from 360 Caucasian dried femori. Anat Res Int 2012:679658PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2014) Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:155–161CrossRefPubMed Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2014) Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:155–161CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2015) No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1425–1431CrossRefPubMed Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2015) No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1425–1431CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wang W, Tsai TY, Yue B, Kwon YM, Li G (2014) Posterior femoral condylar offsets of a Chinese population. Knee 21:553–556CrossRefPubMed Wang W, Tsai TY, Yue B, Kwon YM, Li G (2014) Posterior femoral condylar offsets of a Chinese population. Knee 21:553–556CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Weinberg DS, Streit JJ, Gebhart JJ, Williamson DF, Goldberg VM (2015) Important differences exist in posterior condylar offsets in an osteological collection of 1,058 femurs. J Arthroplasty 30:1434–1438CrossRefPubMed Weinberg DS, Streit JJ, Gebhart JJ, Williamson DF, Goldberg VM (2015) Important differences exist in posterior condylar offsets in an osteological collection of 1,058 femurs. J Arthroplasty 30:1434–1438CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wernecke GC, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2016) Posterior condylar cartilage thickness and posterior condylar offset of the femur: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24:12–15CrossRef Wernecke GC, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2016) Posterior condylar cartilage thickness and posterior condylar offset of the femur: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24:12–15CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yazar F, Imre N, Battal B, Bilgic S, Tayfun C (2012) Is there any relation between distal parameters of the femur and its height and width? Surg Radiol Anat 34:125–132CrossRefPubMed Yazar F, Imre N, Battal B, Bilgic S, Tayfun C (2012) Is there any relation between distal parameters of the femur and its height and width? Surg Radiol Anat 34:125–132CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population
Authors
Yong-Gon Koh
Ji-Hoon Nam
Hyun-Seok Chung
Ho-Joong Kim
Heoung-Jae Chun
Kyoung-Tak Kang
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5259-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2019 Go to the issue