Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Knee

Characterization of patellar maltracking using dynamic kinematic CT imaging in patients with patellar instability

Authors: Miho J. Tanaka, John J. Elias, Ariel A. Williams, Shadpour Demehri, Andrew J. Cosgarea

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Little has been reported on the relationship between patellar maltracking and instability. Patellar maltracking has been subjectively described with the “J sign” but is difficult to assess objectively using traditional imaging. Dynamic kinematic computed tomography (DKCT) allows dynamic assessment of the patellofemoral joint. DKCT was used to visualize and quantify patellar maltracking patterns, and severity of maltracking was correlated with the presence or absence of patellar instability symptoms.

Methods

Seventy-six knees in 38 patients were analysed using DKCT. Maltracking was defined as deviation of the patella from the trajectory of the trochlear groove and was characterized by patellar bisect offset, which was measured at 10° intervals of knee flexion during active flexion and extension. Bisect offset measurements were grouped by number of quadrants of maximum lateral patellar motion, with one, two, and three quadrants corresponding to 75–99, 100–125, and >125 %, respectively. Patellar instability symptoms were correlated with maltracking severity.

Results

Two knees were excluded because of poor imaging quality. Fifty of 74 knees had patellar instability, and 13 patients had bilateral symptoms. Of these, four (8 %) had normal tracking patterns; 41 (82 %) had increased lateral translation in extension, which we termed the J-sign pattern; 4 (8 %) had persistent lateralization of the patella throughout range of motion; and 1 had increased lateral translation in flexion. In knees with the J-sign pattern, degree of maltracking was graded by severity: J1 (n = 24), J2 (n = 19), and J3 (n = 15). The sensitivities of J-sign grades in predicting patellar instability symptoms were 50 % (J1), 80 % (J2), and 93 % (J3) (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in sensitivity between knees with no J sign or J1 versus J2 or J3 (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

DKCT showed several patellar maltracking patterns in patients with patellar instability. A J-sign pattern with more than two quadrants of lateral translation correlated with the presence of patellar instability symptoms. Incorporation of this approach of objectively quantifying maltracking patterns is recommended in the evaluation of patellofemoral instability.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Biyani R, Elias JJ, Saranathan A, Feng H, Guseila LM, Morscher MA, Jones KC (2014) Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2334–2341CrossRefPubMed Biyani R, Elias JJ, Saranathan A, Feng H, Guseila LM, Morscher MA, Jones KC (2014) Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2334–2341CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brossmann J, Muhle C, Schroder C, Melchert UH, Bull CC, Spielmann RP, Heller M (1993) Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. Radiology 187:205–212CrossRefPubMed Brossmann J, Muhle C, Schroder C, Melchert UH, Bull CC, Spielmann RP, Heller M (1993) Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. Radiology 187:205–212CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients. Am J Sports Med 41:374–384CrossRefPubMed Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients. Am J Sports Med 41:374–384CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dietrich TJ, Betz M, Pfirrmann CWA, Koch PP, Fucentese SF (2014) End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance (TTTG) in asymptomatic volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:214–218CrossRefPubMed Dietrich TJ, Betz M, Pfirrmann CWA, Koch PP, Fucentese SF (2014) End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance (TTTG) in asymptomatic volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:214–218CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Draper CE, Besier TF, Fredericson M, Santos JM, Beaupre GS, Delp SL, Gold GE (2011) Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res 29:312–317CrossRefPubMed Draper CE, Besier TF, Fredericson M, Santos JM, Beaupre GS, Delp SL, Gold GE (2011) Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res 29:312–317CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Izadpanah K, Weitzel E, Vicari M, Hennig J, Weigel M, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2014) Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2655–2661CrossRefPubMed Izadpanah K, Weitzel E, Vicari M, Hennig J, Weigel M, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2014) Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2655–2661CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kalia V, Obray RW, Filice R, Fayad LM, Murphy K, Carrino JA (2009) Functional joint imaging using 256-MDCT: technical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W295–W299CrossRefPubMed Kalia V, Obray RW, Filice R, Fayad LM, Murphy K, Carrino JA (2009) Functional joint imaging using 256-MDCT: technical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W295–W299CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McDermott SE, Anthony CA, McCunniff P, Duchman K, Albright JP (2013) A clinical and radiographic approach for establishing proper tibial tubercle transfer when using quad active femoral nerve stimulation. Iowa Orthop J 33:84–89PubMedPubMedCentral McDermott SE, Anthony CA, McCunniff P, Duchman K, Albright JP (2013) A clinical and radiographic approach for establishing proper tibial tubercle transfer when using quad active femoral nerve stimulation. Iowa Orthop J 33:84–89PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Post WR (1999) Clinical evaluation of patients with patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 15:841–851CrossRefPubMed Post WR (1999) Clinical evaluation of patients with patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 15:841–851CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Seitlinger G, Scheurecker G, Hogler R, Labey L, Innocenti B, Hofmann S (2014) The position of the tibia tubercle in 0°–90° flexion: comparing patients with patella dislocation to healthy volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2396–2400CrossRefPubMed Seitlinger G, Scheurecker G, Hogler R, Labey L, Innocenti B, Hofmann S (2014) The position of the tibia tubercle in 0°–90° flexion: comparing patients with patella dislocation to healthy volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2396–2400CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sheehan FT, Derasari A, Fine KM, Brindle TJ, Alter KE (2010) Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:266–275CrossRefPubMed Sheehan FT, Derasari A, Fine KM, Brindle TJ, Alter KE (2010) Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:266–275CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Smith TO, Clark A, Neda S, Arendt EA, Post WR, Grelsamer RP, Dejour D, Almqvist KF, Donell ST (2012) The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the physical examination methods used to assess patients with patellofemoral joint instability. Knee 19:404–410CrossRefPubMed Smith TO, Clark A, Neda S, Arendt EA, Post WR, Grelsamer RP, Dejour D, Almqvist KF, Donell ST (2012) The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the physical examination methods used to assess patients with patellofemoral joint instability. Knee 19:404–410CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Smith TO, Davies L, Donell ST (2009) The reliability and validity of assessing medio-lateral patellar position: a systematic review. Man Ther 14:355–362CrossRefPubMed Smith TO, Davies L, Donell ST (2009) The reliability and validity of assessing medio-lateral patellar position: a systematic review. Man Ther 14:355–362CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tanaka MJ, Elias JJ, Williams AA, Carrino JA, Cosgarea AJ (2015) Correlation between changes in tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance and patellar position during active knee extension on dynamic kinematic computed tomographic imaging. Arthroscopy 31:1748–1755CrossRefPubMed Tanaka MJ, Elias JJ, Williams AA, Carrino JA, Cosgarea AJ (2015) Correlation between changes in tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance and patellar position during active knee extension on dynamic kinematic computed tomographic imaging. Arthroscopy 31:1748–1755CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ward SR, Shellock FG, Terk MR, Salsich GB, Powers CM (2002) Assessment of patellofemoral relationships using kinematic MRI: comparison between qualitative and quantitative methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:69–74CrossRefPubMed Ward SR, Shellock FG, Terk MR, Salsich GB, Powers CM (2002) Assessment of patellofemoral relationships using kinematic MRI: comparison between qualitative and quantitative methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:69–74CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Williams AA, Elias JJ, Tanaka MJ, Thawait GK, Demehri S, Carrino JA, Cosgarea AJ (2015) The relationship between tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance and abnormal patellar tracking in patients with unilateral patellar instability. Arthroscopy 32:55–61CrossRefPubMed Williams AA, Elias JJ, Tanaka MJ, Thawait GK, Demehri S, Carrino JA, Cosgarea AJ (2015) The relationship between tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance and abnormal patellar tracking in patients with unilateral patellar instability. Arthroscopy 32:55–61CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yao J, Yang B, Niu W, Zhou J, Wang Y, Gong H, Ma H, Tan R, Fan Y (2014) In vivo measurements of patellar tracking and finite helical axis using a static magnetic resonance based methodology. Med Eng Phys 36:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed Yao J, Yang B, Niu W, Zhou J, Wang Y, Gong H, Ma H, Tan R, Fan Y (2014) In vivo measurements of patellar tracking and finite helical axis using a static magnetic resonance based methodology. Med Eng Phys 36:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Characterization of patellar maltracking using dynamic kinematic CT imaging in patients with patellar instability
Authors
Miho J. Tanaka
John J. Elias
Ariel A. Williams
Shadpour Demehri
Andrew J. Cosgarea
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4216-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2016 Go to the issue