Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Knee

Facing the decision about the treatment of hip or knee osteoarthritis: What are patients’ needs?

Authors: Jasmijn du Long, Michiel Hageman, Dick Vuijk, Alexander Rakic, D. Haverkamp

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is an increasing interest in modern orthopaedic practice to empower patients to participate in shared decision-making. Decision aids are thought to be helpful in this process. Before creating decision aids for patients with osteoarthritis in the knee or hip, the goal was to identify the needs of patients and physicians when deciding about the treatment. Specifically, this study tested the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in decisional conflict between patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and orthopaedic surgeons.

Methods

Thirty-three orthopaedic surgeons and 172 patients with either knee or hip osteoarthritis were surveyed. Patients entered their demographic information and completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the Patient–Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Physicians entered their demographic and professional information and completed the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the Decisional Conflict Scale.

Results

The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between patients [mean (SD), 33 (19)] and physicians [mean (SD), 24 (14)], regarding decisional conflict about the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. It also showed that patients’ decisional conflict was associated with the patient–doctor relationship, and there was a need for information and clearness of one’s values for risks and benefits.

Conclusion

Patients had a higher magnitude of decisional conflict than physicians and that the level of decisional conflict was positively influenced by the patient–doctor relationship. Patients had high needs regarding information and clearness of one’s values for risks and benefits.

Level of evidence

II.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adam JA, Khaw FM, Thomson RG, Gregg PJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA (2008) Patient decision aids in joint replacement surgery: a literature review and an opinion survey of consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(3):198–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adam JA, Khaw FM, Thomson RG, Gregg PJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA (2008) Patient decision aids in joint replacement surgery: a literature review and an opinion survey of consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(3):198–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Asghari A, Nicholas MK (2001) Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain 94(1):85–100PubMed Asghari A, Nicholas MK (2001) Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain 94(1):85–100PubMed
3.
go back to reference Coulter A, Cleary PD (2001) Patients’ experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 20(3):244–252CrossRef Coulter A, Cleary PD (2001) Patients’ experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 20(3):244–252CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J (1996) What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 156(13):1414–1420CrossRefPubMed Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J (1996) What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 156(13):1414–1420CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Doring AC, Hageman MG, Mulder FJ et al (2014) Trigger finger: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision making. J Hand Surg Am 39(11):2208–2213CrossRefPubMed Doring AC, Hageman MG, Mulder FJ et al (2014) Trigger finger: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision making. J Hand Surg Am 39(11):2208–2213CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hageman MG, Kinaci A, Ju K et al (2014) Carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision-making. J Hand Surg Am 39(9):1799–1804CrossRefPubMed Hageman MG, Kinaci A, Ju K et al (2014) Carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision-making. J Hand Surg Am 39(9):1799–1804CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J (2001) Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 84(1):48–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J (2001) Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 84(1):48–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference LeBlanc A, Kenny DA, O’Connor AM, Legare F (2009) Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: a dyadic approach to shared decision making. Med Decis Mak 29(1):61–68CrossRef LeBlanc A, Kenny DA, O’Connor AM, Legare F (2009) Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: a dyadic approach to shared decision making. Med Decis Mak 29(1):61–68CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Legare F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S (2006) Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and the difference between patients’ and physicians’ decisional conflict. Med Decis Mak 26(4):373–390CrossRef Legare F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S (2006) Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and the difference between patients’ and physicians’ decisional conflict. Med Decis Mak 26(4):373–390CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCracken LM, Dhingra L (2002) A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag 7(1):45–50CrossRefPubMed McCracken LM, Dhingra L (2002) A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag 7(1):45–50CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11(2):153–163CrossRefPubMed Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11(2):153–163CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef
15.
18.
go back to reference Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Van Oppen P, Van Marwijk HW, De Beurs E, Van Dyck R (2004) A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 26(2):115–120CrossRefPubMed Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Van Oppen P, Van Marwijk HW, De Beurs E, Van Dyck R (2004) A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 26(2):115–120CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Van Oldenrijk J, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, Harmse IW, Poolman RW (2009) Re: validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17(1):133–134CrossRefPubMed Van Oldenrijk J, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, Harmse IW, Poolman RW (2009) Re: validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17(1):133–134CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Weng HH, Kaplan RM, Boscardin WJ et al (2007) Development of a decision aid to address racial disparities in utilization of knee replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 57(4):568–575CrossRefPubMed Weng HH, Kaplan RM, Boscardin WJ et al (2007) Development of a decision aid to address racial disparities in utilization of knee replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 57(4):568–575CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Facing the decision about the treatment of hip or knee osteoarthritis: What are patients’ needs?
Authors
Jasmijn du Long
Michiel Hageman
Dick Vuijk
Alexander Rakic
D. Haverkamp
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-3993-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2016 Go to the issue