Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Knee

Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery

Authors: Kate E. Webster, Julian A. Feller

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the performance of the short form-12 (SF-12) health survey is comparable with the longer version SF-36 for measuring health-related quality of life over time in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have joint replacement surgery.

Methods

Four hundred and seven patients with knee osteoarthritis completed the SF-36 before surgery and at a minimum of 12 months following knee replacement. SF-12 item responses were obtained from the responses given to the SF-36 questionnaire. Correlation coefficients were calculated between SF-12 and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores and the respective change in scores. Sensitivity to change was determined with the standardised response mean (SRM).

Results

PCS and MCS scores were highly correlated between SF-12 and SF-36 versions for both preoperative and post-operative measures (r = 0.90–0.96, p < 0.0001). Change scores (post-operative–preoperative) were also highly correlated (PCS: r = 0.88, p < 0.001; MCS: r = 0.93, p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was large for the PCS scale (all SRMs >1.0). Correlations above 0.7 were found between change scores for each SF-36 and SF-12 subscale except General Health (r = 0.55).

Conclusions

The SF-12 summary measures and component scores replicate well with the SF-36 and show similar responsiveness to change. The SF-12 appears to be an adequate alternative for use in patients with knee osteoarthritis who undergo replacement surgery, and its brevity should be attractive for both clinicians and patients.

Level of evidence

I.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3):339–344CrossRefPubMed Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3):339–344CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Escobar A, Quintana J, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(3):273–280CrossRefPubMed Escobar A, Quintana J, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(3):273–280CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171–178CrossRefPubMed Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171–178CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P (1998) Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 37(8):862–869CrossRefPubMed Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P (1998) Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 37(8):862–869CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Keller S, Majkut T, Kosinski M, Ware JJ (1999) Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview. Med Care 37(5):MS1-9PubMed Keller S, Majkut T, Kosinski M, Ware JJ (1999) Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview. Med Care 37(5):MS1-9PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dempster M, Donnelly MA (2001) Comparative analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among ischaemic heart disease patients. J Health Psychol 6(6):707–711CrossRefPubMed Dempster M, Donnelly MA (2001) Comparative analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among ischaemic heart disease patients. J Health Psychol 6(6):707–711CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, Brnabic AJ, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJ, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM (1999) Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171(5):235–238PubMed March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, Brnabic AJ, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJ, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM (1999) Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171(5):235–238PubMed
9.
go back to reference Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich S (2004) Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 90(5):523–527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich S (2004) Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 90(5):523–527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2004) Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):801–808CrossRefPubMed Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2004) Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):801–808CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, Lau F, Noseworthy T (1999) Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke 30(6):1213–1217CrossRefPubMed Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, Lau F, Noseworthy T (1999) Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke 30(6):1213–1217CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine 31(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine 31(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME (2007) User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey, 2nd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME (2007) User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey, 2nd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln
14.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B (2002) How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B (2002) How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln
16.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Webster KE, Feller JA (2014) Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1142–1148CrossRefPubMed Webster KE, Feller JA (2014) Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1142–1148CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery
Authors
Kate E. Webster
Julian A. Feller
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3904-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2016 Go to the issue