Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Knee

Age does not affect the clinical and radiological outcomes after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Authors: Kenichi Goshima, Takeshi Sawaguchi, Daigo Sakagoshi, Kenji Shigemoto, Yu Hatsuchi, Mika Akahane

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a well-established procedure in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle. Several studies have evaluated factors that negatively influence outcomes. However, few reports have investigated the effect of age on HTO outcome. We evaluated the influence of the age on the outcome after HTO.

Methods

The TomoFix® plate was used to perform 60 consecutive OWHTOs. Twenty-six knees in 23 patients >65 years old (mean age at surgery 68.7 ± 2.9 years; range 65–75 years, group A) were compared with 34 knees in 27 patients <65 years old (mean age at surgery 56.2 ± 7.5 years; range 38–64 years, group B) with respect to the clinical and radiological outcomes after HTO. The clinical evaluation included the Japanese Orthopedic Association Knee Score (JOA score), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and complications after surgery.

Results

There were no statistical differences in the background factors between the two groups. Postoperatively, the mean JOA score showed a significant improvement in both groups. The mean OKS after surgery was 41.6 ± 5.9 in group A and 41.4 ± 5.9 in group B. There were no statistical differences in the postoperative knee alignment and clinical outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusion

OWHTO using the rigid long plate was an effective procedure independent of patient’s age. The results showed that age did not influence the clinical and radiological outcomes after OWHTO.
Literature
1.
Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:291–300CrossRefPubMed
2.
Aoki Y, Yasuda K, Mikami S et al (2006) Inverted V-shaped high tibial osteotomy compared with closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Ten-year follow-up result. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1336–1340CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bonnin MP, Laurent JR, Zadegan F, Badet R, Pooler Archbold HA, Servien E (2013) Can patients really participate in sport after high tibial osteotomy? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:64–73CrossRefPubMed
4.
Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1548–1557CrossRefPubMed
5.
Brinkman JM, Luites JW, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2010) Early full weight bearing is safe in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Acta Orthop 81:193–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Dorsey WO, Miller BS, Tadje JP, Bryant CR (2006) The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 19:95–98PubMed
7.
Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, Boudriot U, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Ishaque B, Lakemeier S, Schofer MD (2011) Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG (2011) Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics 34:e622–e628PubMed
9.
Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2006) A 12–28-year follow up study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:91–96CrossRefPubMed
10.
Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:170–180CrossRefPubMed
11.
Hankemeier S, Mommsen P, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Brand J, Meyer C, Meller R (2010) Accuracy of high tibial osteotomy: comparison between open- and closed-wedge technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1328–1333CrossRefPubMed
12.
Holden DL, James SL, Larson RL, Slocum DB (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy in patients who are fifty years old or less. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:977–982CrossRefPubMed
13.
Jung WH, Chun CW, Lee JH, Ha JH, Kim JH, Jeong JH (2013) Comparative study of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy using 2 different implants. Arthroscopy 29:1063–1071CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Kohn L, Sauerschnig M, Iskansar S, Lorenz S, Meidinger G, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2013) Age does not influence the clinical outcome after high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:146–151CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Kolb K, Koller H, Grutzner P (2009) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked low-profile plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2581–2588CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Koller H, Grutzner P, Kolb K (2010) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked low-profile plate: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:197–207CrossRefPubMed
18.
Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138CrossRefPubMed
19.
Luscombe KL, Lim J, Jones PW, White SH (2007) Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution! Int Orthop 31:321–324CrossRefPubMed
20.
Luites JW, Brinkman JM, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2009) Fixation stability of opening- versus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomised clinical trial using radiostereometry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1459–1465CrossRefPubMed
21.
Meidinger G, Imhoff AB, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, Hinterwimmer S (2011) May smokers and overweight patients be treated with a medial open-wedge HTO? Risk factors for non-union. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:333–339CrossRefPubMed
22.
Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1010–1014CrossRefPubMed
23.
Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ (1999) The Install Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10- to -22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:18–27CrossRef
24.
Odenbring S, Tjornstrand B, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Luxhoj T, Svanstrom A (1989) Function after tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis below aged 50 years. Acta Orthop Scand 60:527–531CrossRefPubMed
25.
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Gallagher J, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2009) Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:185–189CrossRefPubMed
26.
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:198–204CrossRefPubMed
27.
Pape D, Lorbach O, Schmitz C, Busch LC, Van Giffen N, Seil R, Kohn DM (2010) Effect of a biplanar osteotomy on primary stability following high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:204–211CrossRefPubMed
28.
Rudan JF, Simurda MA (1990) High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:251–256
29.
Staubli AE, De SC, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia—early results in 92 cases. Injury 34:B55–B62CrossRefPubMed
30.
Stoffel K, Stachowiak G, Kuster M (2004) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix Plate. Clin Biomech 19:944–950CrossRef
31.
Spahn G, Hofmann GO, von Engelhardt LV, Li M, Neubauer H, Klinger HM (2013) The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:96–112CrossRefPubMed
32.
Spahn G, Wittig R (2002) Primary stability of various implants in tibial opening wedge osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Sci 7:683–687CrossRefPubMed
33.
Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:469–474CrossRefPubMed
34.
Takeuchi R, Aratake M, Bito H, Saito I, Kumagai K, Hayashi R, Sasaki Y, Akamatsu Y, Ishikawa H, Amakado E, Aota Y, Saito T (2009) Clinical results and radiographical evaluation of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:361–368CrossRefPubMed
35.
Takeuchi R, Bito H, Akamatsu Y, Shiraishi T, Morishita S, Koshino T, Saito T (2010) In vitro stability of open wedge high tibial osteotomy with synthetic bone graft. Knee 17:217–220CrossRefPubMed
36.
Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Aratake M, Bito H, Saito I, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Saito T (2009) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with early full weight bearing. Arthroscopy 25:46–53CrossRefPubMed
37.
Trieb K, Grohs J, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Stulnig T, Panotopoulos J, Wanivenhaus A (2006) Age predicts outcome of high-tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:149–152CrossRefPubMed
38.
Yasuda K, Majima T, Tsuchida T, Kaneda K (1992) A ten- to 15-year follow-up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 282:186–195
Metadata
Title
Age does not affect the clinical and radiological outcomes after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy
Authors
Kenichi Goshima
Takeshi Sawaguchi
Daigo Sakagoshi
Kenji Shigemoto
Yu Hatsuchi
Mika Akahane
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3847-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2017 Go to the issue

Knee

Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Knee

Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group

Knee

Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Knee

Applicability of a modified angular correction measurement method for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Knee

Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Knee

Relaxation of the MCL after an Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy results in decreasing contact pressures of the knee over time