Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Hip

Are pelvic anatomical structures in danger during arthroscopic acetabular labral repair? Definition of safe bone depth

Authors: Arel Gereli, Baris Kocaoglu, Kerem Tekin Ulku, Abdul veli Ismailoglu, Sena Silay, Mustafa Karahan

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safe depth for suture anchor insertion during acetabular labral repair and to determine the neighbouring structures at risk during drilling and anchor insertion.

Methods

Ten human cadaveric hips (six males and four females) were obtained. Acetabular labral surface was prepared and marked for right hips as 12, 1 and 3 o’clock positions, for left hips 12, 11 and 9 o’clock positions. Those were defined as anterior, anterior–superior and superior zones, respectively. These labral positions were drilled at defined zones. After measurements, depth of the bone at 10° and 20° drill angles on zones was compared statistically.

Results

Acetabular bone widths at investigated labral insertion points did not statistically differ. A total of 14 injuries in 60 penetrations occurred (23.3 %) with free drill penetrations, and no injuries occurred with stopped drill penetrations. The bone depth was gradually decreasing from 10° to 20° drill angles and from anterior to superior inserting zones without significant importance. The risk of perforation to the pelvic cavity started with 20 mm drill depth, and the mean depth for all insertions was calculated as 31.7 mm (SD 2.6).

Conclusions

It is anatomically possible that some pelvic structures sustain iatrogenic injury during acetabular drilling for anchor placement. Being aware of mean pelvic vault is important in which drilling after excessive pincer rim trimming could easily decrease the depth of acetabular bone without a standard. Careful drilling by using stopped drill bit is crucial to prevent iatrogenic injury.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC (2006) Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1448–1457PubMed Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC (2006) Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1448–1457PubMed
2.
go back to reference Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:925–935CrossRefPubMed Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:925–935CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson T (1999) Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 15:132–137CrossRefPubMed Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson T (1999) Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 15:132–137CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hernandez JD, McGrath BE (2008) Safe angle for suture anchor insertion during acetabular labral repair. Arthroscopy 24(12):1390–1394CrossRefPubMed Hernandez JD, McGrath BE (2008) Safe angle for suture anchor insertion during acetabular labral repair. Arthroscopy 24(12):1390–1394CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philipon MJ (2005) Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy 21:1496–1504CrossRefPubMed Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philipon MJ (2005) Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy 21:1496–1504CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, Gandhi R, Ayeni OR (2013) Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1669–1675CrossRefPubMed Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, Gandhi R, Ayeni OR (2013) Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1669–1675CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN (1996) The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 12(3):269–272CrossRefPubMed Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN (1996) The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 12(3):269–272CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Larson CM, Giveans MR (2009) Arthroscopic debridement versus re-fixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 25(4):369–376CrossRefPubMed Larson CM, Giveans MR (2009) Arthroscopic debridement versus re-fixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 25(4):369–376CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lertwanich P, Ejnisman L, Torry MR, Giphart JE, Philippon MJ (2011) Defining a safety margin for labral suture anchor insertion using the acetabular rim angle. Am J Sports Med 39(Suppl):111S–116SCrossRefPubMed Lertwanich P, Ejnisman L, Torry MR, Giphart JE, Philippon MJ (2011) Defining a safety margin for labral suture anchor insertion using the acetabular rim angle. Am J Sports Med 39(Suppl):111S–116SCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Murphy KP, Ross AE, Javernick MA, Lehman RA (2006) Repair of the adult acetabular labrum. Arthroscopy 22:567.e1–567.e3CrossRef Murphy KP, Ross AE, Javernick MA, Lehman RA (2006) Repair of the adult acetabular labrum. Arthroscopy 22:567.e1–567.e3CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J (2010) Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):504–510CrossRefPubMed Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J (2010) Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):504–510CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):16–23CrossRefPubMed Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):16–23CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Saadat E, Martin S, Thornhill T, Brownlee Losina E, Katz J (2013) Factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 42(6):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saadat E, Martin S, Thornhill T, Brownlee Losina E, Katz J (2013) Factors associated with the failure of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 42(6):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Are pelvic anatomical structures in danger during arthroscopic acetabular labral repair? Definition of safe bone depth
Authors
Arel Gereli
Baris Kocaoglu
Kerem Tekin Ulku
Abdul veli Ismailoglu
Sena Silay
Mustafa Karahan
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3797-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2017 Go to the issue