Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Ankle

Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of individual ankle syndesmosis structures in asymptomatic and surgically treated cohorts

Authors: Thomas O. Clanton, Charles P. Ho, Brady T. Williams, Rachel K. Surowiec, Coley C. Gatlin, C. Thomas Haytmanek, Robert F. LaPrade

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Historically, syndesmosis injuries have been underdiagnosed. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3.0-T MRI presentations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and its individual structures in both asymptomatic and injured cohorts.

Methods

Ten age-matched asymptomatic volunteers were imaged to characterize the asymptomatic syndesmotic anatomy. A series of 21 consecutive patients with a pre-operative 3.0-T ankle MRI and subsequent arthroscopic evaluation for suspected syndesmotic injury were reviewed and analysed. Prospectively collected pre-operative MRI findings were correlated with arthroscopy to assess diagnostic accuracy [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)].

Results

Pathology diagnosed on pre-operative MRI correlated strongly with arthroscopic findings. Syndesmotic ligament disruption was prospectively diagnosed on MRI with excellent sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy: anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (87.5, 100, 100, 71.4, 90.5 %); posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (N/A, 95.2, 0.0, 100, 95.2 %); and interosseous tibiofibular ligament (66.7, 86.7, 66.7, 86.7, 81.0 %).

Conclusions

Pre-operative 3.0-T MRI demonstrated excellent accuracy in the diagnosis of syndesmotic ligament tears and allowed for the visualization of relevant individual syndesmosis structures. Using a standard clinical ankle MRI protocol at 3.0-T, associated ligament injuries could be readily identified. Clinical implementation of optimal high-field MRI sequences in a standard clinical ankle MRI exam can aid in the diagnosis of syndesmotic injuries, augment pre-operative planning, and facilitate anatomic repair by providing additional details regarding the integrity of individual syndesmotic structures not discernible through physical examination and radiographic assessments.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
Bartonicek J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25(5–6):379–386CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bauer JS, Banerjee S, Henning TD, Krug R, Majumdar S, Link TM (2007) Fast high-spatial-resolution MRI of the ankle with parallel imaging using GRAPPA at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):240–245CrossRefPubMed
3.
Beumer A, Swierstra BA, Mulder PG (2002) Clinical diagnosis of syndesmotic instability evaluation of stress tests behind the curtains. Acta Orthop Scand 73(6):667–669PubMed
4.
Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, van Leeuwen WJ, Sikma W, Niesing R, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2003) External rotation stress imaging in syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: comparison of lateral radiography and radiostereometry in a cadaveric model. Acta Orthop Scand 74(2):201–205CrossRefPubMed
5.
Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Niesing R, Entius CA, Ginai AZ, Mulder PG, Swierstra BA (2004) Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:227–234CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H (2004) MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(1):131–136CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
César de César PC, Avila EM, de Abreu MR (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int 32(12):1110–1114CrossRef
9.
Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA (2006) Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 28(2):142–149CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC (1998) Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 19(10):653–660CrossRefPubMed
12.
Griffith JF, Lau DT, Yeung DK, Wong MW (2012) High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification. Skeletal Radiol 41(4):387–399CrossRefPubMed
13.
Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S, Suh JS, Choi YR (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 28(3):336–342CrossRefPubMed
14.
Harper MC, Keller TS (1989) A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle 10(3):156–160CrossRefPubMed
15.
Hermans JJ, Beumer A, de Jong TA, Kleinrensink GJ (2010) Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with multimodality approach. J Anat 217(6):633–645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Hermans JJ, Beumer A, Hop WC, Moonen AF, Ginai AZ (2012) Tibiofibular syndesmosis in acute ankle fractures—additional value of an oblique MR image plane. Skelet Radiol 41(2):193–202CrossRef
17.
Hermans JJ, Ginai AZ, Wentink N, Hop WC, Beumer A (2011) The additional value of an oblique image plane for MRI of the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Skelet Radiol 40(1):75–83CrossRef
18.
Hermans JJ, Wentink N, Beumer A, Hop WC, Heijiboer MP, Moonen AF, Ginai AZ (2012) Correlation between radiological assessment of acute ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury on MRI. Skelet Radiol 41(7):787–801CrossRef
19.
Hopkinson WJ, Pierre PS, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Hunt KJ, George E, Harris AH, Dragoo JL (2013) Epidemiology of syndesmosis injuries in intercollegiate football: incidence and risk factors from National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data 2004–2005 to 2008–2009. Clin J Sport Med 23(4):278–282CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kim S, Huh YM, Song HT, Lee SA, Lee JW, Lee JE, Chung IH, Suh JS (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of the ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging. Radiology 242(1):225–235CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lui TH, Ip K, Chow HT (2005) Comparison of radiologic and arthroscopic diagnoses of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption in acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy 21(11):1370PubMed
24.
McCollum GA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, van Dijk CN (2013) Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1328–1337CrossRefPubMed
25.
Muhle C, Frank LR, Rand T, Ahn JM, Yeh LR, Trudell D, Haghighi P, Resnick D (1998) Tibiofibular syndesmosis: high resolution MRI using a local gradient coil. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22(6):938–944CrossRefPubMed
26.
Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2005) Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:216–221CrossRefPubMed
27.
Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Ishida J, Ochi M (2003) Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 227(1):155–161CrossRefPubMed
28.
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 10(5):558–560CrossRefPubMed
29.
Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG (2002) The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 23(2):107–111PubMed
30.
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin 13(4):611–633CrossRefPubMed
31.
Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(3):356–357PubMed
32.
Rasmussen O (1985) Stability of the ankle joint. Analysis of the function and traumatology of the ankle ligaments. Acta Orthop Scan Suppl 211:1–75CrossRef
33.
Shah AS, Kadakia AR, Tan GJ, Karadsheh MS, Wolter TD, Sabb B (2012) Radiographic evaluation of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 33(10):870–876CrossRefPubMed
34.
Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, Wright RW, Fritts H, Boyd JL, Fischer DA (2012) Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int 33(5):371–378CrossRefPubMed
35.
Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae L, Linklater J, Black DA, Nicholoson LL, Burns J, Refshauge KM (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury. Br J Sports Med. doi:10.​1136/​bjsports-2013-092787
36.
Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, Linklater J, Black DA, Refschuage KM (2014) Prognosis of ankle syndesmosis injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46(4):671–677CrossRefPubMed
37.
Sman AD, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 47(10):620–628CrossRefPubMed
38.
Stoffel K, Wysocki D, Baddour E, Nicholls R, Yates P (2009) Comparison of two intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis. A cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(11):2646–2652CrossRefPubMed
39.
Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, Iwata A, Kawasaki K, Tobita M, Mivamoto W, Oae K (2001) Arthroscopic diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption. Arthroscopy 17(8):836–843CrossRefPubMed
40.
Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, Naito K, Uchio Y (2003) Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(3):324–329CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
43.
Vogl TJ, Hochmuth K, Diebold T, Lubrich J, Hofmann R, Stöckle U, Söllner O, Bisson S, Südkamp N, Maeurer J, Haas N, Felix R (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute injured distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Invest Radiol 32(7):401–409CrossRefPubMed
44.
Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, Olson EJ, Popovic NA (1995) The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):847–856PubMed
45.
Williams GN, Jones MH, Amendola A (2007) Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1197–1207CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zindrick MR, Hopkins DE, Knight GW (1985) The effects of lateral talar shift upon the biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthop Trans 9:332–333
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of individual ankle syndesmosis structures in asymptomatic and surgically treated cohorts
Authors
Thomas O. Clanton
Charles P. Ho
Brady T. Williams
Rachel K. Surowiec
Coley C. Gatlin
C. Thomas Haytmanek
Robert F. LaPrade
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3399-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue

Editorial

The making of ESSKA: from an organization to an institution

Shoulder

The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI

Sports Medicine

Plantaris injuries in elite UK track and field athletes over a 4-year period: a retrospective cohort study

Experimental Study

Multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering

Elbow

Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow

Sports Medicine

Muscle injuries of the lower extremity: a comparison between young and old male elite soccer players