Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Elbow

Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow

Authors: Timothy J. Jackson, Shelby E. Jarrell, Gregory J. Adamson, Kyung Chil Chung, Thay Q. Lee

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this study was to examine the functional characteristics of the anterior and posterior bands of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL).

Methods

Six cadaveric elbows were tested using a digital tracking system to measure the strain in the anterior band and posterior band of the anterior bundle of the UCL throughout a flexion/extension arc. The specimens were then placed in an Instron materials testing machine and loaded to failure to determine yield load and ultimate load of the UCL.

Results

The posterior band showed a linear increase in strain with increasing degrees of elbow flexion while the anterior band showed minimal change in strain throughout. The bands showed similar strain at yield load and ultimate load, demonstrating similar intrinsic properties.

Conclusion

The anterior band of the anterior bundle of the UCL shows an isometric strain pattern through elbow range of motion, while the posterior band shows an increasing strain pattern in higher degrees of elbow flexion. Both bands show similar strain in a load to failure model, indicating insertion point, not intrinsic differences, of the bands determine the function of the anterior bundle of the UCL. This demonstrates a biomechanical rationale for UCL reconstructions using single point anatomical insertion points.
Literature
1.
Bernas GA, Thiele RAR, Kinnaman KA, Hughes RE, Miller BS, Carpenter JE (2009) Defining safe rehabilitation for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2392–2400CrossRefPubMed
2.
Cain EL Jr, Dugas JR, Wolf RS, Andrews JR (2003) Elbow injuries in throwing athletes: a current concepts review. Am J Sports Med 31(4):621–635PubMed
3.
Callaway GH, Field LD, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, Warren RF (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(8):1223–1231PubMed
4.
Ciccotti MG, Siegler S, Kuri JA 2nd, Thinnes JH, Murphy DJ (2009) Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study. Am J Sports Med 37(5):974–981CrossRefPubMed
5.
Floris S, Olsen BS, Dalstra M, Sojbjerg JO, Sneppen O (1998) The medial collateral ligament of the elbow joint: anatomy and kinematics. J Shoulder Elb Surg 7(4):345–351CrossRef
6.
Fuss FK (1991) The ulnar collateral ligament of the human elbow joint. Anatomy, function and biomechanics. J Anat 175:203–212PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Jackson TJ, Adamson GJ, Peterson A, Patton J, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2013) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique. Am J Sports Med 41(5):1158–1164CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jobe FW, Kvitne RS (1991) Elbow instability in the athlete. Instr Course Lect 40:17–23
9.
Lynch JR, Waitayawinyu T, Hanel DP, Trumble TE (2008) Medial collateral ligament injury in the overhand-throwing athlete. J Hand Surg Am 33(3):430–437CrossRefPubMed
10.
Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN (1991) Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 265:187–195PubMed
11.
Mullen DJ, Goradia VK, Parks BG, Matthews LS (2002) A biomechanical study of stability of the elbow to valgus stress before and after reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(3):259–264CrossRef
12.
Pribyl CR, Hurley DK, Wascher DC, McNally TP, Firoozbakhsh K, Weiser MW (1999) Elbow ligament strain under valgus load: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics 22(6):607–612PubMed
13.
Udall JH, Fitzpatrick MJ, McGarry MH, Leba TB, Lee TQ (2009) Effects of flexor-pronator muscle loading on valgus stability of the elbow with an intact, stretched, and resected medial ulnar collateral ligament. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18(5):773–778CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow
Authors
Timothy J. Jackson
Shelby E. Jarrell
Gregory J. Adamson
Kyung Chil Chung
Thay Q. Lee
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3482-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue

Shoulder

Concurrent AC joint dislocation, coracoclavicular ligament rupture and coracoid base fracture

Hip

Is early treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement the key to avoiding associated full thickness isolated chondral defects?

Sports Medicine

Immersive virtual reality improves movement patterns in patients after ACL reconstruction: implications for enhanced criteria-based return-to-sport rehabilitation

Elbow

Clinical relevance of distal biceps insertional and footprint anatomy

Editorial

The making of ESSKA: from an organization to an institution

Experimental Study

Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers