Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Knee

Cam impingement of the posterior femoral condyle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Authors: Murat Bozkurt, Ramazan Akmese, Nurdan Cay, Çetin Isik, Yenel Gurkan Bilgetekin, Merve Gulbiz Kartal, Osman Tecimel

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There has been much emphasis on the importance of cam impingement, which is a cause of pain and knee hyperflexion restriction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to correlate cam impingement in the posterior femoral condyle with an α-angle showing the severity of the impingement.

Methods

The study groups consisted of 87 knees of 74 patients operated on with phase 3 medial Oxford UKA. Postoperatively, Group A (68 knees, 78.2 %) had no remnant of cam lesion; Group B (19 knees, 21.8 %) had cam lesion remnants. In Group C (18 knees, 20.7 %), which is a subgroup of Group A, cam lesions seen preoperatively were cleaned and not seen postoperatively.

Results

The mean increase in active flexion was 20.4° (±7.3°) in Group A, 9.7° (±6.1°) in Group B and 20.8° (±7.3°) in Group C. The difference between Group A and Group B and between Group B and Group C was statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The mean decrease of α-angle was 11.2° (±4.1°) in Group B, and 31.1° (±3.4°) in Group C. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Mean Oxford Knee Scores were 24 preoperatively, 41 postoperatively in Group A; 22 preoperatively, 38 postoperatively in Group B; and 24 preoperatively, 40 postoperatively in Group C. The differences were not significant.

Conclusions

Posterior condylar cam lesion is an impingement which limits hyperflexion and may be an early clinical finding prior to bearing dislocation and wear. The α-angle is a marker showing the severity of this cam lesion. This problem can be overcome using intraoperative fluoroscan views during cam excison and replacing the femoral component in 105° knee flexion.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee. Orthopade 33(11):1277–1283PubMedCrossRef Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee. Orthopade 33(11):1277–1283PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551–556PubMedCrossRef Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551–556PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53PubMedCrossRef Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choy WS, Kim KJ, Lee SK, Yang DS, Lee NK (2011) Mid-term results of oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 3(3):178–183PubMedCrossRef Choy WS, Kim KJ, Lee SK, Yang DS, Lee NK (2011) Mid-term results of oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 3(3):178–183PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garg A, Walker PS (1990) Prediction of total knee motion using a 3-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biomech 23:45–58PubMedCrossRef Garg A, Walker PS (1990) Prediction of total knee motion using a 3-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biomech 23:45–58PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60(3):358–369PubMed Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60(3):358–369PubMed
7.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, O’Connor JJ (1987) Unicompartmental Oxford Meniscal knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2(1):1–9PubMedCrossRef Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, O’Connor JJ (1987) Unicompartmental Oxford Meniscal knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2(1):1–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kendrick BJ, Longino D, Pandit H, Svard U, Gill HS, Dodd CA, Murray DW, Price AJ (2010) Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):367–373PubMed Kendrick BJ, Longino D, Pandit H, Svard U, Gill HS, Dodd CA, Murray DW, Price AJ (2010) Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):367–373PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kendrick BJ, Simpson DJ, Kaptain BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Murray DW, Price AJ (2011) Polyethylene wear of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:470–475PubMed Kendrick BJ, Simpson DJ, Kaptain BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Murray DW, Price AJ (2011) Polyethylene wear of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:470–475PubMed
10.
go back to reference Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Ylinen P, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(5):617–624PubMedCrossRef Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Ylinen P, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(5):617–624PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:151–156PubMed Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:151–156PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lisowski LA, Van Den Beckerom MPJ, Pilot P, Van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2011) Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:277–284PubMedCrossRef Lisowski LA, Van Den Beckerom MPJ, Pilot P, Van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2011) Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:277–284PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop (SICOT) 34:1137–1143CrossRef Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop (SICOT) 34:1137–1143CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP (2002) Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 20:881–886PubMedCrossRef Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP (2002) Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 20:881–886PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):862–865PubMedCrossRef Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):862–865PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Connor J, Imran A (2007) Bearing movement after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a mathematical model. Orthopedics 30(5):42–45PubMed O’Connor J, Imran A (2007) Bearing movement after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a mathematical model. Orthopedics 30(5):42–45PubMed
18.
go back to reference Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Gallagher J, Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2009) Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:185–189PubMed Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Gallagher J, Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2009) Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:185–189PubMed
19.
go back to reference Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):198–204PubMed Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):198–204PubMed
20.
go back to reference Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982PubMedCrossRef Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R (2000) Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 12:143–155PubMedCrossRef Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R (2000) Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 12:143–155PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Soda Y, Oishi J, Nakasa T, Nishikawa K, Ochi M (2007) New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:167–170PubMedCrossRef Soda Y, Oishi J, Nakasa T, Nishikawa K, Ochi M (2007) New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:167–170PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194PubMedCrossRef Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Szabo G, Lovasz G, Kustos T, Bener A (2000) A prospective comparative analysis of mobility in osteoarthritic knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1167–1169PubMedCrossRef Szabo G, Lovasz G, Kustos T, Bener A (2000) A prospective comparative analysis of mobility in osteoarthritic knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1167–1169PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Walker PS, Yildirim G, Fort JS, Roth J, White B, Klein GR (2007) Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee replacements. A laboratory study. J Arthroplasty 22(5):745–752PubMedCrossRef Walker PS, Yildirim G, Fort JS, Roth J, White B, Klein GR (2007) Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee replacements. A laboratory study. J Arthroplasty 22(5):745–752PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon JM, Mathis KB (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orth Relat Res 404:172–188CrossRef Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon JM, Mathis KB (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orth Relat Res 404:172–188CrossRef
28.
go back to reference White SH, Roberts S, Jones PW (2012) The twin peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases. Knee 19:36–40PubMedCrossRef White SH, Roberts S, Jones PW (2012) The twin peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases. Knee 19:36–40PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cam impingement of the posterior femoral condyle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors
Murat Bozkurt
Ramazan Akmese
Nurdan Cay
Çetin Isik
Yenel Gurkan Bilgetekin
Merve Gulbiz Kartal
Osman Tecimel
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2301-2

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013 Go to the issue