Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2005

01-10-2005 | Knee

Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements

Authors: Scott A. Banks, Benjamin J. Fregly, Filippo Boniforti, Christoph Reinschmidt, Sergio Romagnoli

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Preserving both cruciate ligaments in unicondylar knee arthroplasty likely provides more normal knee mechanics and contributes to enhanced patient function. It follows that preserving both cruciate ligaments with total knee arthroplasty should provide functional benefit compared to arthroplasty sacrificing one or both cruciates. The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics in patients with optimally functioning cruciate-preserving medial unicondylar and bi-unicondylar arthroplasty to determine if knee motions differed. Eight consenting patients with seven medial unicondylar and five bi-unicondylar arthroplasties were studied using lateral fluoroscopy during treadmill gait, stair stepping, and maximum flexion activities. Patient-specific geometric models based on CT and CAD data were used for shape matching to determine the three-dimensional knee kinematics. Tibiofemoral contact locations were computed for the replaced compartments. Maximum flexion in kneeling was 135°±14° for unicondylar knees and 123°±14° for bi-unicondylar knees (p=0.22). For 0°–30° flexion during the stair activity, the medial condyle translated posterior 3.5±2.5 mm in unicondylar knees and 4.7±1.9 mm in bi-unicondylar knees (p>0.05). Lateral posterior translation was 5.0±2.3 mm in bi-unicondylar knees for 0°–30° flexion. From heel-strike to mid-stance phase, there was little tibial rotation, but unicondylar knees showed 1.5±1.6 mm posterior translation of the medial condyle, while bi-unicondylar knees showed 5.1±2.2 mm (p<<0.05). The bi-unicondylar knees showed 3.8±3.4 mm posterior lateral condylar translation. Preserving both cruciate ligaments in knee arthroplasty appears to maintain some basic features of normal knee kinematics. Knees with bi-unicondylar arthroplasty showed kinematics closer to motions observed in total knee arthroplasty, slightly less weight-bearing flexion, and greater dynamic laxity in gait than unicondylar knees. Despite kinematic differences, knees with unicondylar and bi-unicondylar arthroplasty can provide excellent functional outcomes in appropriately selected patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Insall J, Walker P (1976) Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop (120):83–85 Insall J, Walker P (1976) Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop (120):83–85
2.
go back to reference Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1992) The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop (276):245–252PubMed Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1992) The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop (276):245–252PubMed
3.
go back to reference Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg 83-B(2):191–194CrossRefPubMed Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg 83-B(2):191–194CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73(7):544–551PubMed Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73(7):544–551PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A(3):506–511 Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A(3):506–511
6.
go back to reference Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Rosenberg AG (1996) Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(5):553–559PubMed Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Rosenberg AG (1996) Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(5):553–559PubMed
7.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S (2002) In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(8):1049–1054 Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S (2002) In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(8):1049–1054
8.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop (205):21–42 Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop (205):21–42
9.
go back to reference Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A (1999) Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A(5):697–702PubMed Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A (1999) Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A(5):697–702PubMed
10.
go back to reference Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1982) The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg 64-A(9):1,328–1,335 Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1982) The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg 64-A(9):1,328–1,335
11.
go back to reference Pritchett JW (1996) Anterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(2):194–197PubMed Pritchett JW (1996) Anterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(2):194–197PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA (2000) The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15(5):545–550CrossRefPubMed Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA (2000) The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15(5):545–550CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Komistek RD, Allain J, Anderson DT, Dennis DA, Goutallier D (2002) In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop (404):315–325 Komistek RD, Allain J, Anderson DT, Dennis DA, Goutallier D (2002) In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop (404):315–325
14.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop (248):13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop (248):13–14PubMed
15.
go back to reference Banks SA, Hodge WA (1996) Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(6):638–649CrossRefPubMed Banks SA, Hodge WA (1996) Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(6):638–649CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans PAMI 8(6):679–698 Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans PAMI 8(6):679–698
17.
go back to reference Tupling S, Pierrynowski M (1987) Use of Cardan angles to locate rigid bodies in three-dimensional space. Med Biol Eng Comput 25(5): 527–532PubMed Tupling S, Pierrynowski M (1987) Use of Cardan angles to locate rigid bodies in three-dimensional space. Med Biol Eng Comput 25(5): 527–532PubMed
18.
go back to reference Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop (271):96–100PubMed Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop (271):96–100PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneuker H, Moermans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of deep flexion kinematics in total knee arthroplasty: the influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg 84-B:50–53CrossRef Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneuker H, Moermans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of deep flexion kinematics in total knee arthroplasty: the influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg 84-B:50–53CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Banks SA, Bellemans J, Nozaki H et al (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 410:131–138PubMed Banks SA, Bellemans J, Nozaki H et al (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 410:131–138PubMed
21.
go back to reference Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibio-femoral movement. 1. The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1189–1195 Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibio-femoral movement. 1. The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1189–1195
22.
go back to reference Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. 2. The loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1,196–1,198 Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. 2. The loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1,196–1,198
23.
go back to reference Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A (1988) The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 21(9):705–720CrossRefPubMed Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A (1988) The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 21(9):705–720CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) The mechanics of knee replacements during gait. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of two designs. Am J Knee Surg 10(4):261–267PubMed Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) The mechanics of knee replacements during gait. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of two designs. Am J Knee Surg 10(4):261–267PubMed
25.
go back to reference Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) 2003 Hap Paul Award paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile bearing knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19(7):809–816 Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) 2003 Hap Paul Award paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile bearing knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19(7):809–816
Metadata
Title
Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements
Authors
Scott A. Banks
Benjamin J. Fregly
Filippo Boniforti
Christoph Reinschmidt
Sergio Romagnoli
Publication date
01-10-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2005
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0565-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2005

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2005 Go to the issue

Announcements

October 2005