Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Knee

Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study

Authors: Daisuke Hatsushika, Akimoto Nimura, Tomoyuki Mochizuki, Kumiko Yamaguchi, Takeshi Muneta, Keiichi Akita

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To date, there is no consensus on the detailed anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the most appropriate PCL reconstruction method. The purpose of this study is the detailed observation of separate small PCL bundles for better comprehension of detailed PCL anatomy to facilitate the design of anatomic PCL reconstruction.

Methods

Twelve cadaveric knees were used in this study. PCL was divided into anterolateral and posteromedial (PM) sections and then separated into about 20 small bundles of 1 mm in diameter while maintaining preservation of their attachment sites marked with fine coloured marker pens. The positional relationship between the femoral and tibial attachments of each small bundle was investigated.

Results

The small bundles of tibial and femoral attachments showed a topographical correlation. The anterior–posterior aligned bundles in the tibia corresponded to the bundles aligned in a low–high direction in flexion in the femur. The femoral attachment pattern was relatively similar in each specimen. However, the tibial attachment showed two patterns of small bundle footprint location: a parabolic type (6 of 12) and a transverse type (6 of 12). The posterior portion of the PM bundle was separately attached to the medial and lateral portions in the tibial attachment.

Conclusion

Small bundles of PCL showed a relatively layered arrangement between tibial and femoral attachments. Therefore, anatomic PCL reconstruction cannot be completed simply performed merely with straight bundles and circular bone tunnels.
Literature
1.
Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM, Edwards A (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):257–263PubMedCrossRef
2.
Apsingi S, Bull AM, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2009) Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(6):652–659PubMedCrossRef
3.
Chen B, Gao S (2009) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a non-hardware suspension fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 25(7):777–782PubMedCrossRef
4.
Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH, Chou SW (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: minimal 3 years follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32(2):361–368PubMedCrossRef
5.
Chuang TY, Ho WP, Chen CH, Liao YS, Chen WJ (2004) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inlay technique with quadriceps tendon-bone autograft. Arthroscopy 20(4):e23–e28PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32(2):346–360PubMedCrossRef
7.
Covey DC, Sapega AA, Sherman GM (1996) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations. Am J Sports Med 24(6):740–746PubMedCrossRef
8.
Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23(3):284–290PubMedCrossRef
9.
Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231PubMedCrossRef
10.
Harner CD, Vogrin TM, Hoher J, Ma CB, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Deficiency of the posterolateral structures as a cause of graft failure. Am J Sports Med 28(1):32–39PubMed
11.
Harner CD, Xerogeanes JW, Livesay GA, Carlin GJ, Smith BA, Kusayama T, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1995) The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 23(6):736–745PubMedCrossRef
12.
Jung YB, Tae SK, Lee YS, Jung HJ, Nam CH, Park SJ (2008) Active non-operative treatment of acute isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury with cylinder cast immobilization. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(8):729–733PubMedCrossRef
13.
Kim SJ, Jung M, Moon HK, Kim SG, Chun YM (2010) Anterolateral transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anatomical reconstruction of posterolateral corner insufficiency: comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction over a 2- to 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39(3):481–489PubMedCrossRef
14.
Lahner M, Vogel T, von Engelhardt LV, Schulz MS, Strobel MJ (2011) Isolated AL bundle reconstruction of the PCL. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(3):363–370PubMedCrossRef
15.
Li G, Papannagari R, Li M, Bingham J, Nha KW, Allred D, Gill T (2008) Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion. Am J Sports Med 36(3):474–479PubMedCrossRef
16.
Lorenz S, Elser F, Brucker PU, Obst T, Imhoff AB (2009) Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(6):683–690PubMedCrossRef
17.
Makris CA, Georgoulis AD, Papageorgiou CD, Moebius UG, Soucacos PN (2000) Posterior cruciate ligament architecture: evaluation under microsurgical dissection. Arthroscopy 16(6):627–632PubMedCrossRef
18.
Markolf KL, McAllister DR, Young CR, McWilliams J, Oakes DA (2003) Biomechanical effects of medial-lateral tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 21(1):177–182PubMedCrossRef
19.
Matava MJ, Ellis E, Gruber B (2009) Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tears: an evolving technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(7):435–446PubMed
20.
Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30(5):643–651PubMed
21.
Min BH, Lee YS, Jin CZ, Son KH (2011) Evaluation of transtibial double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a single-sling method with a tibialis anterior allograft. Am J Sports Med 39(2):374–379PubMedCrossRef
22.
Moorman CT 3rd, Murphy Zane MS, Bansai S, Cina SJ, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Kaseta MK (2008) Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods. Arthroscopy 24(3):269–275PubMedCrossRef
23.
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1241–1252PubMedCrossRef
24.
Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):274–279PubMedCrossRef
25.
Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT (2007) The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J 3(2):137–146PubMedCrossRef
26.
Race A, Amis AA (1994) The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 27(1):13–24PubMedCrossRef
27.
Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV (1999) The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 27(3):276–283PubMed
28.
Shon OJ, Lee DC, Park CH, Kim WH, Jung KA (2010) A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin Orthop Surg 2(2):76–84PubMedCrossRef
29.
Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1055–1059PubMedCrossRef
30.
Yoon KH, Kim YH, Ha JH, Kim K, Park WM (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of double bundle augmentation of posterior cruciate ligament using finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25(10):1042–1046CrossRef
31.
Zhao J, Huangfu X, He Y, Yang X, Zhu Y (2008) Simultaneous double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 24(11):1205–1213PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study
Authors
Daisuke Hatsushika
Akimoto Nimura
Tomoyuki Mochizuki
Kumiko Yamaguchi
Takeshi Muneta
Keiichi Akita
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2224-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2013 Go to the issue

Knee

Do patients benefit from tourniquet in arthroscopic surgeries of the knee?

Knee

Posterior cruciate ligament tears: functional and postoperative rehabilitation

Knee

Combined PCL and PLC reconstruction in chronic posterolateral instability

Experimental Study

Cryopreservation with glycerol improves the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human patellar tendon allografts

Shoulder

Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

Knee

The relationship between patellofemoral and tibiofemoral morphology and gait biomechanics following arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy