Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2009

01-06-2009 | Knee

Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament

Authors: Stephan Lorenz, Florian Elser, Peter U. Brucker, Tobias Obst, Andreas B. Imhoff

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The optimal technique of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is still controversial. Besides different parameters as surgical technique and graft choice, the exact anatomic placement of the graft is essential for successful reconstruction of the PCL. For intraoperative control and postoperative radiological evaluation of the anatomical placement of the anterolatelateral (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) of the PCL, the radiological localization of both functional bundles of the PCL has yet to be determined. Therefore, in this descriptive laboratory study, the insertion sites of the ALB and PMB of the PCL on the femur and the common tibial insertion site were macroscopically identified and marked with copper wires in 16 human cadaver specimens. Radiological evaluation of the femoral insertion sites of the ALB and PMB in AP full extension and true lateral radiography was performed using an angle segment transformation based on the tangent of the femoral condyles and a modified reticule system of the quadrant method, respectively. On the tibial site, the footprint of the PCL was defined as ratios of the geometric insertion site with respect to the mediolateral and sagittal diameter of the tibia in AP and true lateral radiography. Femorally, the geometric insertion points of the ALB and PMB were located on the reticule at x = 62 ± 3%/y = 16 ± 6% and x = 51 ± 5%/y = 35 ± 7%, respectively; the angle segments for the PMB were between 40 ± 5° and 56 ± 6° and for the ALB were between 56 ± 6° and 76 ± 7°. Tibially, the common insertion point of the PCL was located at 51 ± 2% of the mediolateral diameter of the tibial plateau with respect to the lateral border and 13 ± 2% inferiorly to the medial tibial plateau with respect to the sagittal diameter of the tibial plateau. In conclusion, the knowledge of the anatomical insertion sites of the PCL in standardized radiography may help the orthopaedic surgeon for correct intraoperative placement and postoperative evaluation of the tunnel placement. In addition, the data might be a useful tool for fluoroscopic-based navigation in PCL reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM et al (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:257–263PubMedCrossRef Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM et al (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:257–263PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H et al (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21 (discussion 21-22)PubMed Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H et al (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21 (discussion 21-22)PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Harner CD (2006) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: scientific rationale and surgical technique. Instr Course Lect 55:497–507PubMed Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Harner CD (2006) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: scientific rationale and surgical technique. Instr Course Lect 55:497–507PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:346–360PubMedCrossRef Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:346–360PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dennis MG, Fox JA, Alford JW et al (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: current trends. J Knee Surg 17:133–139PubMed Dennis MG, Fox JA, Alford JW et al (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: current trends. J Knee Surg 17:133–139PubMed
6.
go back to reference Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:284–290PubMed Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:284–290PubMed
7.
go back to reference Giffin JR, Haemmerle MJ, Vogrin TM et al (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15:114–120PubMed Giffin JR, Haemmerle MJ, Vogrin TM et al (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15:114–120PubMed
8.
go back to reference Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231 Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231
9.
go back to reference Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Lindenfield TN (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:197–207PubMedCrossRef Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Lindenfield TN (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:197–207PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM et al (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749PubMed Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM et al (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749PubMed
11.
go back to reference Harner CD, Hoher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26:471–482PubMed Harner CD, Hoher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26:471–482PubMed
12.
go back to reference Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR et al (1980) Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:438–450PubMed Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR et al (1980) Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:438–450PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mannor DA, Shearn JT, Grood ES et al (2000) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension. Am J Sports Med 28:833–845PubMed Mannor DA, Shearn JT, Grood ES et al (2000) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension. Am J Sports Med 28:833–845PubMed
15.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524PubMedCrossRef Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA et al (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 30:312–317PubMed McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA et al (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 30:312–317PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30:643–651PubMed Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30:643–651PubMed
18.
go back to reference Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMed Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMed
19.
go back to reference Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J et al (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:938–944PubMed Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J et al (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:938–944PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ortiz GJ, Schmotzer H, Bernbeck J et al (1998) Isometry of the posterior cruciate ligament. Effects of functional load and muscle force application. Am J Sports Med 26:663–668PubMed Ortiz GJ, Schmotzer H, Bernbeck J et al (1998) Isometry of the posterior cruciate ligament. Effects of functional load and muscle force application. Am J Sports Med 26:663–668PubMed
21.
go back to reference Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, Nha KW et al (2007) Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 35:1507–1512PubMedCrossRef Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, Nha KW et al (2007) Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 35:1507–1512PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A et al (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463PubMedCrossRef Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A et al (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Racanelli JA, Drez D Jr (1994) Posterior cruciate ligament tibial attachment anatomy and radiographic landmarks for tibial tunnel placement in PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 10:546–549PubMed Racanelli JA, Drez D Jr (1994) Posterior cruciate ligament tibial attachment anatomy and radiographic landmarks for tibial tunnel placement in PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 10:546–549PubMed
24.
go back to reference Race A, Amis AA (1996) Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in a-P drawer. J Biomech 29:873–879PubMedCrossRef Race A, Amis AA (1996) Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in a-P drawer. J Biomech 29:873–879PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179PubMedCrossRef Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Race A, Amis AA (1994) The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 27:13–24PubMedCrossRef Race A, Amis AA (1994) The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 27:13–24PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Saddler SC, Noyes FR, Grood ES et al (1996) Posterior cruciate ligament anatomy and length-tension behavior of PCL surface fibers. Am J Knee Surg 9:194–199PubMed Saddler SC, Noyes FR, Grood ES et al (1996) Posterior cruciate ligament anatomy and length-tension behavior of PCL surface fibers. Am J Knee Surg 9:194–199PubMed
28.
go back to reference Schulz MS, Russe K, Weiler A et al (2003) Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:186–191PubMed Schulz MS, Russe K, Weiler A et al (2003) Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:186–191PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sheps DM, Otto D, Fernhout M (2005) The anatomic characteristics of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 21:820–825PubMedCrossRef Sheps DM, Otto D, Fernhout M (2005) The anatomic characteristics of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 21:820–825PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL et al (1988) Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 6:593–610PubMedCrossRef Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL et al (1988) Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 6:593–610PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M et al (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1055–1059PubMedCrossRef Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M et al (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1055–1059PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament
Authors
Stephan Lorenz
Florian Elser
Peter U. Brucker
Tobias Obst
Andreas B. Imhoff
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0770-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2009 Go to the issue