Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2010

01-03-2010 | Knee

Use of anthropometric data from the medial tibial and femoral condyles to design unicondylar knee prostheses in the Chinese population

Authors: Fu Bo Cheng, Xiao Feng Ji, Wen Xu Zheng, Ying Lai, Kai Liang Cheng, Jia Chun Feng, You Qiong Li

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Anthropometric data on medial tibial condyles and medial femoral condyles of 172 normal knees (94 male knees, 78 female knees) were obtained using three-dimensional computer tomographic measurements. In the medial tibial condyle, we measured the anteroposterior (AP) and widest dimension (WD), and compared the measurements with the similar dimensions of five tibial unicondylar knee prostheses conventionally used in China. In the femur, we used best-fit two-circular arcs to measure the morphology of the sagittal plane of the medial femoral condyle. We found that three of the prostheses showed WD overhang for all ranges of the AP dimension, while two of them showed WD underhang. We also found a progressive decrease in the condylar aspect ratio (WD/AP%) in parallel with an increase in the AP dimension in the medial tibial condyle. However, none of the conventional tibial prosthesis showed a similar change. Furthermore, males had larger values in aspect ratio than females with the same values for AP dimension. There were definite correlations between the radius of the curvature for the posterior part (R1) and distal part (R2) in the sagittal plane of medial femoral condyle. Both of these values were smaller than in the Caucasian population. Both radiuses of curvature for the posterior and distal components showed definite correlations with the AP dimension. The results of this study may provide guidelines for designing unicondylar knee prostheses suitable for the Chinese population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60CrossRefPubMed Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213PubMed Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:5–11PubMed Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:5–11PubMed
6.
go back to reference Elias SG, Feeman MAR, Gokcay EI (1990) A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:98–103PubMed Elias SG, Feeman MAR, Gokcay EI (1990) A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:98–103PubMed
7.
go back to reference Emerson RH, Martinez JM (2008) Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2706–2719CrossRefPubMed Emerson RH, Martinez JM (2008) Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2706–2719CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick C, Fitzpatrick D, Lee J, Auger D (2007) Statistical design of unicompartment tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee 14:138–144CrossRefPubMed Fitzpatrick C, Fitzpatrick D, Lee J, Auger D (2007) Statistical design of unicompartment tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee 14:138–144CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Freeman MA, Pinskerova V (2005) The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 38:197–208CrossRefPubMed Freeman MA, Pinskerova V (2005) The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 38:197–208CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Holman T et al (2003) Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:115–122CrossRef Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Holman T et al (2003) Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:115–122CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:259–268PubMed Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:259–268PubMed
12.
go back to reference Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82:1189–1195CrossRef Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82:1189–1195CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135CrossRefPubMed Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kurosawa H, Walker S, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T (1985) Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech 18:487–499CrossRefPubMed Kurosawa H, Walker S, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T (1985) Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech 18:487–499CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee IS, Choi JA, Kim TK, Han I, Lee JW, Kang HS (2006) Reliability analysis of 16-MDCT in preoperative evaluation of total knee arthroplasty and comparison with intraoperative measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1778–1782CrossRefPubMed Lee IS, Choi JA, Kim TK, Han I, Lee JW, Kang HS (2006) Reliability analysis of 16-MDCT in preoperative evaluation of total knee arthroplasty and comparison with intraoperative measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1778–1782CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Thomas BS (2008) Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2724–2729CrossRefPubMed Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Thomas BS (2008) Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2724–2729CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R et al (2004) Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109CrossRefPubMed Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R et al (2004) Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1975) Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:231–241PubMed Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1975) Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:231–241PubMed
19.
go back to reference Nuño N, Ahmed AM (2001) Sagittal profile of the femoral condyles and its application to femorotibial contact analysis. J Biomech Eng 123:18–26CrossRefPubMed Nuño N, Ahmed AM (2001) Sagittal profile of the femoral condyles and its application to femorotibial contact analysis. J Biomech Eng 123:18–26CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nuño N, Ahmed AM (2003) Three-dimensional morphometry of the femoral condyles. Clin Biomech 18:924–932CrossRef Nuño N, Ahmed AM (2003) Three-dimensional morphometry of the femoral condyles. Clin Biomech 18:924–932CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC (1998) Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:143–148CrossRefPubMed Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC (1998) Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:143–148CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rankin EA, Bostrom M, Hozack W, Jacobs JJ, McCarthy JC, O’Connor MI et al (2008) Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 16:63–67 Rankin EA, Bostrom M, Hozack W, Jacobs JJ, McCarthy JC, O’Connor MI et al (2008) Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 16:63–67
23.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Wing JT, Berend ME, Davis KE, Meding JB (2008) The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:331–336CrossRefPubMed Ritter MA, Wing JT, Berend ME, Davis KE, Meding JB (2008) The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:331–336CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Röstlund T, Carlsson L, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1989) Morphometrical studies of human femoral condyles. J Biomed Eng 11:442–448CrossRefPubMed Röstlund T, Carlsson L, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1989) Morphometrical studies of human femoral condyles. J Biomed Eng 11:442–448CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed
26.
go back to reference Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28:983–984PubMed Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28:983–984PubMed
27.
go back to reference Servien E, Saffarini M, Lustig S, Chomel S, Neyret P (2008) Lateral versus medial tibial plateau: morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1141–1145CrossRefPubMed Servien E, Saffarini M, Lustig S, Chomel S, Neyret P (2008) Lateral versus medial tibial plateau: morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1141–1145CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Siu D, Rudan J, Wevers HW, Griffiths P (1996) Femoral articular shape and geometry: a three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee. J Arthroplasty 11:166–173CrossRefPubMed Siu D, Rudan J, Wevers HW, Griffiths P (1996) Femoral articular shape and geometry: a three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee. J Arthroplasty 11:166–173CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:61–72CrossRefPubMed Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:61–72CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Surendran S, Kwak DS, Lee UY, Park SE, Gopinathan P, Han SH et al (2007) Anthropometry of the medial tibial condyle to design the tibial component for unicondylar knee arthroplasty for the Korean population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:436–442CrossRefPubMed Surendran S, Kwak DS, Lee UY, Park SE, Gopinathan P, Han SH et al (2007) Anthropometry of the medial tibial condyle to design the tibial component for unicondylar knee arthroplasty for the Korean population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:436–442CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Zoghi M, Hefzy MS, Fu KC, Jackson WT (1992) A three-dimensional morphometrical study of the distal human femur. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 206:147–157 Zoghi M, Hefzy MS, Fu KC, Jackson WT (1992) A three-dimensional morphometrical study of the distal human femur. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 206:147–157
Metadata
Title
Use of anthropometric data from the medial tibial and femoral condyles to design unicondylar knee prostheses in the Chinese population
Authors
Fu Bo Cheng
Xiao Feng Ji
Wen Xu Zheng
Ying Lai
Kai Liang Cheng
Jia Chun Feng
You Qiong Li
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0876-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2010 Go to the issue