Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 3/2022

01-03-2022 | Acute Respiratory Distress-Syndrome | Correction

Correction to: Role of total lung stress on the progression of early COVID‑19 pneumonia

Authors: Silvia Coppola, Davide Chiumello, Mattia Busana, Emanuele Giola, Paola Palermo, Tommaso Pozzi, Irene Steinberg, Stefano Roli, Federica Romitti, Stefano Lazzari, Simone Gattarello, Michela Palumbo, Peter Herrmann, Leif Saager, Michael Quintel, Konrad Meissner, Luigi Camporota, John J. Marini, Stefano Centanni, Luciano Gattinoni

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in Table 2 (wrong confidence interval data of “PEEP” and groups' size). Please find the corrected table below.
Table 2
Gas-exchange and PEEP test in the ARDS subgroups
 
Overall (n = 140)
No ARDS (n = 17)
Mild ARDS (n = 45)
Mild-moderate ARDS (n = 33)
Moderate-severe ARDS (n = 36)
Severe ARDS (n = 9)
p value
Gas exchange
   
PaO2 (mmHg)
104 [79–140]
226 [187–259]
143 [102–151]
112 [100–123]
83.2 [75.9–93.6]
65.1 [59.3–69]
 < 0.001*
FiO2
0.6 [0.6–0.7]
0.6 [0.6–0.7]
0.6 [0.5–0.7]
0.7 [0.5–0.7]
0.7 [0.6–0.7]
0.8 [0.7–0.8]
 < 0.001*
PaCO2 (mmHg)
37 [33.9–40.7]
38.3 [32.6–42.0]
35.9 [32.6–39]
38.8 [35–41]
36.5 [34.8–40.8]
39 [34.2–39.9]
0.37
pH
7.44 [7.42–7.47]
7.44 [7.42–7.46]
7.45 [7.43–7.48]
7.44 [7.43–7.47]
7.44 [7.42–7.46]
7.43 [7.42–7.45]
0.52
Respiratory rate (bpm)
20 [18–24]
16 [15–20]
21 [18–23]
21 [18–24]
21 [18–25]
20 [18–20]
0.039*
PEEP (cmH2O)
7.5 [7.5–10]
10 [7.5–10]
8 [7.5–10]
8 [7.5–10]
9 [7.5–10]
10 [10–10]
0.24
Esophageal pressure swing (cmH2O)
7 [5–10]
6 [5–7]
7 [5–9]
7 [4–9]
9 [7–12]
7 [5–7]
0.06
Total stress (cmH2O)
14 [11.5–16.3]
13 [11.8–15]
13.2 [11.3–16]
13.8 [11–16]
15.2 [12.9–18.6]
14 [13.3–16.8]
0.12
Borg dyspnea scale
0 [0–1]
0 [0–1]
0 [0–0]
0 [0–0]
0 [0–1]
0 [0–1]
0.34
PEEP-test
 
SpO2 at 0 cmH2O (%)
97 [93–99]
98 [94–100]
98 [96–99]
98 [95–99]
95 [93–98]
91 [88–94]
0.003*
SpO2 at 10 cmH2O (%)
98 [96–99]
99 [98–100]
99 [97–100]
98 [97–99]
97 [96–98]
94 [94–98]
0.006*
Respiratory rate at 0 cmH2O (bpm)
22 [18–28]
18 [15–20]
22 [18–28]
23 [20–28]
22 [19–27]
24.5 [22–27]
0.010*
Respiratory rate at 10 cmH2O (bpm)
20 [16–24]
16 [15–18]
20 [17–22]
22 [18–25]
20 [17–28]
19.5 [18–21]
0.007*
Esophageal pressure swing at 0 cmH2O (cmH2O)
8 [6–12]
7 [5–7]
8 [5–10]
8 [5–12]
8 [7–15]
8.8 [6–11]
0.36
Esophageal pressure swing at 10 cmH2O (cmH2O)
7 [5–10]
7.5 [6–9]
7 [5–9]
7 [4–9]
9 [7–12]
7 [6–9]
0.07
Total stress at 0 cmH2O (cmH2O)
8 [6–12]
7 [5–10]
8 [5–10]
8 [5–12]
8 [7–15]
9 [6–11]
0.36
Total stress at 10 cmH2O (cmH2O)
14 [12–17]
14.5 [13–16.3]
14 [12–16]
14 [11.3–16.3]
16 [14–18.5]
14 [13.4–15.6]
0.07
Metadata
Title
Correction to: Role of total lung stress on the progression of early COVID‑19 pneumonia
Authors
Silvia Coppola
Davide Chiumello
Mattia Busana
Emanuele Giola
Paola Palermo
Tommaso Pozzi
Irene Steinberg
Stefano Roli
Federica Romitti
Stefano Lazzari
Simone Gattarello
Michela Palumbo
Peter Herrmann
Leif Saager
Michael Quintel
Konrad Meissner
Luigi Camporota
John J. Marini
Stefano Centanni
Luciano Gattinoni
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06589-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Intensive Care Medicine 3/2022 Go to the issue

From the Inside

The weighing