Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Acute Respiratory Distress-Syndrome | Editorial

How severe COVID-19 infection is changing ARDS management

Authors: Niall D. Ferguson, Tài Pham, Michelle Ng Gong

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Over the last 6 months intensivists and non-intensivists around the world have been treating patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) brought on by COVID-19, often in extreme conditions with overwhelmed healthcare systems. As the first wave of the pandemic has passed in Europe and continues to progress in parts of North America, we pause to consider how severe COVID-19 infection is changing ARDS management and what the lasting implications might be for ARDS from other causes (Table 1).
Table 1
How severe COVID-19 is changing ARDS management
Paradigm
Example
Increased adoption of therapies previously shown to be effective in non-COVID-19 ARDS
Prone positioning in moderate-severe ARDS
Spillover adoption of therapies shown to be effective in COVID-19 ARDS
Early low-dose corticosteroids
Applying evidence-based practice, informed by bedside physiology
Increased clinical interest in respiratory mechanics
Expanding new lines of investigation that may be relevant to both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS
Systemic anticoagulation and anti-platelet agents for pulmonary vascular thrombosis
Anti-inflammatory agents
Sedation with volatile anaesthetic agents
Stromal cell therapies
Highlighting the existence and importance of heterogeneity of treatment effect in ARDS for many therapies
Differential effects of steroids by severity
Proposals for several methods to individualize therapies (sub-phenotypes)
Socializing randomization as the norm in critical care settings
Successful implementation of RECOVERY, REMAP-CAP, ACTIV platform trials
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bellani G et al (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315:788–800CrossRef Bellani G et al (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315:788–800CrossRef
2.
go back to reference The National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network (2019) Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med 380:1997–2008CrossRef The National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network (2019) Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med 380:1997–2008CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Guérin C et al (2018) A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med 44:22–37CrossRef Guérin C et al (2018) A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med 44:22–37CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chen L et al (2020) Potential for lung recruitment estimated by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J RespCrit Care 201:178–187CrossRef Chen L et al (2020) Potential for lung recruitment estimated by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J RespCrit Care 201:178–187CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bertoni M et al (2019) A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 23:346CrossRef Bertoni M et al (2019) A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 23:346CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mauri T et al (2016) Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intens Care Med 42:1360–1373CrossRef Mauri T et al (2016) Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intens Care Med 42:1360–1373CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tomashefski JF (2000) Pulmonary pathology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med 21:435–466CrossRef Tomashefski JF (2000) Pulmonary pathology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med 21:435–466CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How severe COVID-19 infection is changing ARDS management
Authors
Niall D. Ferguson
Tài Pham
Michelle Ng Gong
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06245-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 12/2020 Go to the issue