Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Septicemia | Original

Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting

Authors: Daniel J. Lane, Hannah Wunsch, Refik Saskin, Sheldon Cheskes, Steve Lin, Laurie J. Morrison, Christopher J. Oleynick, Damon C. Scales

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Paramedics are often the first healthcare contact for patients with infection and sepsis and may identify them earlier with improved knowledge of the clinical signs and symptoms that identify patients at higher risk.

Methods

A 1-year (April 2015 and March 2016) cohort of all adult patients transported by EMS in the province of Alberta, Canada, was linked to hospital administrative databases. The main outcomes were infection, or sepsis diagnosis among patients with infection, in the Emergency Department. We estimated the probability of these outcomes, conditional on signs and symptoms that are commonly available to paramedics.

Results

Among 131,745 patients transported by EMS, the prevalence of infection was 9.7% and sepsis was 2.1%. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with sepsis was 28%. The majority (62%) of patients with infections were classified by one of three dispatch categories (“breathing problems,” “sick patient,” or “inter-facility transfer”), and the probability of infection diagnosis was 17–20% for patients within these categories. Patients with elevated temperature measurements had the highest probability for infection diagnosis, but altered Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), low blood pressure, or abnormal respiratory rate had the highest probability for sepsis diagnosis.

Conclusion

Dispatch categories and elevated temperature identify patients with higher probability of infection, but abnormal GCS, low blood pressure, and abnormal respiratory rate identify patients with infection who have a higher probability of sepsis. These characteristics may be considered by paramedics to identify higher-risk patients prior to arrival at the hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Seventienth World Health Assembly (2017) Improving the prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of sepsis, pp 1–4 Seventienth World Health Assembly (2017) Improving the prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of sepsis, pp 1–4
14.
go back to reference Yoshida K, Bartel A, Bohn J, Chipman JJ, McGowan LD, Barrett M, Christensen RHB, Gbouzill (2020) Tableone: create “Table 1” to describe baseline characteristics, version 0.11.1 Yoshida K, Bartel A, Bohn J, Chipman JJ, McGowan LD, Barrett M, Christensen RHB, Gbouzill (2020) Tableone: create “Table 1” to describe baseline characteristics, version 0.11.1
15.
go back to reference Wasey JO (2017) ICD: tools for working with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and finding comorbidities Wasey JO (2017) ICD: tools for working with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and finding comorbidities
31.
go back to reference Coopersmith CM, De Backer D, Deutschman CS et al (2018) Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 44:1400–1426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coopersmith CM, De Backer D, Deutschman CS et al (2018) Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 44:1400–1426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting
Authors
Daniel J. Lane
Hannah Wunsch
Refik Saskin
Sheldon Cheskes
Steve Lin
Laurie J. Morrison
Christopher J. Oleynick
Damon C. Scales
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06093-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 7/2020 Go to the issue