Published in:
01-06-2016 | Original
CAESAR: a new tool to assess relatives’ experience of dying and death in the ICU
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 6/2016
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
To develop an instrument designed specifically to assess the experience of relatives of patients who die in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods
The instrument was developed using a mixed methodology and validated in a prospective multicentre study. Relatives of patients who died in 41 ICUs completed the questionnaire by telephone 21 days after the death, then completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Inventory of Complicated Grief after 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results
A total of 600 relatives were included, 475 in the main cohort and 125 in the reliability cohort. The 15-item questionnaire, named CAESAR, covered the patient’s preferences and values, interactions with/around the patient and family satisfaction. We defined three groups based on CAESAR score tertiles: lowest (≤59, n = 107, 25.9 %), middle (n = 185, 44.8 %) and highest (≥69, n = 121, 29.3 %). Factorial analysis showed a single dimension. Cronbach’s alpha in the main and reliability cohorts was 0.88 (0.85–0.90) and 0.85 (0.79–0.89), respectively. Compared to a high CAESAR score, a low CAESAR score was associated with greater risks of anxiety and depression at 3 months [1.29 (1.13–1.46), p = 0.001], post-traumatic stress-related symptoms at 3 [1.34 (1.17–1.53), p < 0.001], 6 [OR = 1.24 (1.06–1.44), p = 0.008] and 12 [OR = 1.26 (1.06–1.50), p = 0.01] months and complicated grief at 6 [OR = 1.40 (1.20–1.63), p < 0.001] and 12 months [OR = 1.27 (1.06–1.52), p = 0.01].
Conclusions
The CAESAR score 21 days after death in the ICU is strongly associated with post-ICU burden in the bereaved relatives. The CAESAR score should prove a useful primary endpoint in trials of interventions to improve relatives’ well-being.