Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Systematic Review

Prone positioning reduces mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome in the low tidal volume era: a meta-analysis

Authors: Jeremy R. Beitler, Shahzad Shaefi, Sydney B. Montesi, Amy Devlin, Stephen H. Loring, Daniel Talmor, Atul Malhotra

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Prone positioning for ARDS has been performed for decades without definitive evidence of clinical benefit. A recent multicenter trial demonstrated for the first time significantly reduced mortality with prone positioning. This meta-analysis was performed to integrate these findings with existing literature and test whether differences in tidal volume explain conflicting results among randomized trials.

Methods

Studies were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, and citation review. Included were randomized trials evaluating the effect on mortality of prone versus supine positioning during conventional ventilation for ARDS. The primary outcome was risk ratio of death at 60 days meta-analyzed using random effects models. Analysis stratified by high (>8 ml/kg predicted body weight) or low (≤8 ml/kg PBW) mean baseline tidal volume was planned a priori.

Results

Seven trials were identified including 2,119 patients, of whom 1,088 received prone positioning. Overall, prone positioning was not significantly associated with the risk ratio of death (RR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.68–1.02; p = 0.073; I 2  = 64 %). When stratified by high or low tidal volume, prone positioning was associated with a significant decrease in RR of death only among studies with low baseline tidal volume (RR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.50–0.86; p = 0.002; I 2  = 25 %). Stratification by tidal volume explained over half the between-study heterogeneity observed in the unstratified analysis.

Conclusions

Prone positioning is associated with significantly reduced mortality from ARDS in the low tidal volume era. Substantial heterogeneity across studies can be explained by differences in tidal volume.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A et al (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308. doi:10.1056/NEJM200005043421801 CrossRef Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A et al (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM200005043421​801 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H et al (2013) The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 39:1704–1713. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-3037-2 PubMedCrossRef Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H et al (2013) The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 39:1704–1713. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-013-3037-2 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Piehl MA, Brown RS (1976) Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 4:13–14PubMedCrossRef Piehl MA, Brown RS (1976) Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 4:13–14PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pappert D, Rossaint R, Slama K et al (1994) Influence of positioning on ventilation-perfusion relationships in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 106:1511–1516PubMedCrossRef Pappert D, Rossaint R, Slama K et al (1994) Influence of positioning on ventilation-perfusion relationships in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 106:1511–1516PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Carlesso E (2013) Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure: impact and clinical fallout through the following 20 years. Intensive Care Med 39:1909–1915. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-3066-x PubMedCrossRef Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Carlesso E (2013) Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure: impact and clinical fallout through the following 20 years. Intensive Care Med 39:1909–1915. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-013-3066-x PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mackenzie CF (2001) Anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the prone position and postural drainage. Crit Care Med 29:1084–1085PubMedCrossRef Mackenzie CF (2001) Anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the prone position and postural drainage. Crit Care Med 29:1084–1085PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sud S, Friedrich JO, Taccone P et al (2010) Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 36:585–599. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1748-1 PubMedCrossRef Sud S, Friedrich JO, Taccone P et al (2010) Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 36:585–599. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-009-1748-1 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Malhotra A, Ayas N, Kacmarek R (2002) Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 346:295–297PubMedCrossRef Malhotra A, Ayas N, Kacmarek R (2002) Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 346:295–297PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13PubMed Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13PubMed
29.
go back to reference Earle CC, Pham B, Wells GA (2000) An assessment of methods to combine published survival curves. Med Decis Making 20:104–111PubMedCrossRef Earle CC, Pham B, Wells GA (2000) An assessment of methods to combine published survival curves. Med Decis Making 20:104–111PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef
31.
33.
go back to reference Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A et al (2010) Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 303:865–873. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.218 PubMedCrossRef Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A et al (2010) Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 303:865–873. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2010.​218 PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J et al (2009) Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med 151:566–576PubMedCrossRef Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J et al (2009) Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med 151:566–576PubMedCrossRef
36.
38.
40.
go back to reference Watanabe I, Fujihara H, Sato K et al (2002) Beneficial effect of a prone position for patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy. Crit Care Med 30:1799–1802PubMedCrossRef Watanabe I, Fujihara H, Sato K et al (2002) Beneficial effect of a prone position for patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy. Crit Care Med 30:1799–1802PubMedCrossRef
41.
45.
go back to reference Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N et al (2004) Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 351:327–336. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032193 PubMedCrossRef Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N et al (2004) Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 351:327–336. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa032193 PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH et al (2008) Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:637–645. doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.637 PubMedCrossRef Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH et al (2008) Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:637–645. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​299.​6.​637 PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Mercat A, Richard J-CM, Vielle B et al (2008) Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:646–655. doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.646 PubMedCrossRef Mercat A, Richard J-CM, Vielle B et al (2008) Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:646–655. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​299.​6.​646 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prone positioning reduces mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome in the low tidal volume era: a meta-analysis
Authors
Jeremy R. Beitler
Shahzad Shaefi
Sydney B. Montesi
Amy Devlin
Stephen H. Loring
Daniel Talmor
Atul Malhotra
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3194-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Intensive Care Medicine 3/2014 Go to the issue