Published in:
Open Access
01-08-2018 | Letter
Flash glucose monitoring: objective, not self-referential, outcomes are needed. Reply to Warren RE [letter]
Authors:
Jan Bolinder, Per Oskarsson, Ramiro Antuna, Petronella Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, Jens Krӧger, Raimund Weitgasser
Published in:
Diabetologia
|
Issue 8/2018
Login to get access
Excerpt
To the Editor: We thank Dr Roderick Warren for his letter [
1] regarding our subgroup analysis of the Novel Glucose-Sensing Technology and Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes: a Multicentre, Non-masked, Randomised Controlled Trial (IMPACT; NCT02232698) [
2]. In line with the accepted practice in continuous glucose monitoring studies, the trial was designed to compare individuals using the FreeStyle Libre system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, UK) for glucose monitoring with those using the conventional technique, self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG). The main glycaemic outcome measures with this type of study design require sensor glucose results to be visible to the intervention group but blinded in the control group. Warren reiterates a valid point regarding using the same device for the treatment and assessment of an outcome. This was indeed noted in our original study article [
3]; however the general consensus is that there is no practical alternative to this approach [
4]. …