Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Letter

Exercise training response heterogeneity: statistical insights

Authors: Greg Atkinson, Philip Williamson, Alan M. Batterham

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

To the Editor: We would like to thank Dr Sparks for her comprehensive review of research on individual differences in the responses to exercise training [1]. It was especially helpful to see some of the statistical issues touched upon in this review [2]. We believe that these statistical factors are crucial for answering the fundamental question of whether there are true and clinically important individual differences in the response to exercise. By ‘true’, we mean individual response differences that are not merely random trial-to-trial variability in disguise. By ‘clinically important’, we mean individual differences that exceed a well-rationalised minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We also maintain that, in the ‘roadmap’ for researching this topic, true and clinically relevant individual response differences should be confirmed empirically before any moderators and mediators of the exercise response are explored [3]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sparks LM (2017) Exercise training response heterogeneity: physiological and molecular insights. Diabetologia 60:2329–2336 Sparks LM (2017) Exercise training response heterogeneity: physiological and molecular insights. Diabetologia 60:2329–2336
2.
go back to reference Barker RJ, Schofield MR (2008) Classifying individuals as physiological responders using hierarchical modeling. J Appl Physiol 105:555–560CrossRefPubMed Barker RJ, Schofield MR (2008) Classifying individuals as physiological responders using hierarchical modeling. J Appl Physiol 105:555–560CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Atkinson G, Batterham AM (2015) True and false inter-individual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol 100:577–588CrossRefPubMed Atkinson G, Batterham AM (2015) True and false inter-individual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol 100:577–588CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Williamson PJ, Atkinson G, Batterham AM (2017) Inter-individual responses of maximal oxygen uptake to exercise training: a critical review. Sports Med 47:1501–1513CrossRefPubMed Williamson PJ, Atkinson G, Batterham AM (2017) Inter-individual responses of maximal oxygen uptake to exercise training: a critical review. Sports Med 47:1501–1513CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schubert MM, Sabapathy S, Leveritt M, Desbrow B (2014) Acute exercise and hormones related to appetite regulation: a meta-analysis. Sports Med 44:387–403CrossRefPubMed Schubert MM, Sabapathy S, Leveritt M, Desbrow B (2014) Acute exercise and hormones related to appetite regulation: a meta-analysis. Sports Med 44:387–403CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Senn S, Rolfe K, Julious SA (2011) Investigating variability in patient response to treatment - a case study from a replicate cross-over study. Stat Methods Med Res 20:657–666CrossRefPubMed Senn S, Rolfe K, Julious SA (2011) Investigating variability in patient response to treatment - a case study from a replicate cross-over study. Stat Methods Med Res 20:657–666CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Exercise training response heterogeneity: statistical insights
Authors
Greg Atkinson
Philip Williamson
Alan M. Batterham
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4501-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Diabetologia 2/2018 Go to the issue