Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Short Communication

The insulinotropic effect of pulsatile compared with continuous intravenous delivery of GLP-1

Authors: Mark P. Plummer, Palash Kar, Caroline E. Cousins, Kylie Lange, Marianne J. Chapman, Michael A. Nauck, Michael Horowitz, Juris J. Meier, Adam M. Deane

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

In healthy individuals, both insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are secreted in a pulsatile fashion. Insulin has greater glucose-lowering properties when administered in pulses compared with a constant i.v. infusion. The primary aim of this randomised double-dummy cross-over study was to compare the insulinotropic response to pulsatile and continuous i.v. infusions of equivalent doses of GLP-1.

Methods

Twelve healthy participants aged 18–35 years were randomised to three different treatments on separate days: a continuous infusion day (GLP-1 at 0.6 pmol kg−1 min−1 [1 ml/min] and a 1 ml placebo bolus every 6 min); a pulsatile infusion day (placebo at 1 ml/min and a 3.6 pmol/kg GLP-1 bolus every 6 min); and a placebo day (placebo at 1 ml/min and a 1 ml placebo bolus every 6 min). Between 45 and 120 min, a hyperglycaemic clamp was used to maintain blood glucose at 9 mmol/l. Venous blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations were measured every 5 min from 0 to 45 min and every 1 min from 45 to 120 min; plasma glucagon was measured every 15 min. The order of treatment was randomised by the Pharmacy Department and both study investigators and participants were blinded to the treatment arm. The dextrose requirement and glucagon data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and insulin data were analysed with a linear mixed effects maximum likelihood model.

Results

Continuous and pulsatile infusions of GLP-1 increased the dextrose requirement by ~threefold (p < 0.001) and increased insulin secretion by ~ninefold (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the effect of both treatments. Although hyperglycaemia reduced plasma glucagon concentrations, there was no difference between the treatment days.

Conclusions/interpretation

In healthy individuals, pulsatile and continuous administration of i.v. GLP-1 appears to have comparable insulinotropic effects.

Trial registration:

ACTRN12612001040853

Funding:

This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Paolisso G, Sgambato S, Torella R et al (1988) Pulsatile insulin delivery is more efficient than continuous infusion in modulating islet cell function in normal participants and patients with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:1220–1226CrossRefPubMed Paolisso G, Sgambato S, Torella R et al (1988) Pulsatile insulin delivery is more efficient than continuous infusion in modulating islet cell function in normal participants and patients with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:1220–1226CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Balks HJ, Holst JJ, von zur Muhlen A, Brabant G (1997) Rapid oscillations in plasma glucagon-like peptide1 (GLP-1) in humans: cholinergic control of GLP-1 secretion via muscarinic receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:786–790PubMed Balks HJ, Holst JJ, von zur Muhlen A, Brabant G (1997) Rapid oscillations in plasma glucagon-like peptide1 (GLP-1) in humans: cholinergic control of GLP-1 secretion via muscarinic receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:786–790PubMed
6.
go back to reference Plummer MP, Jones KL, Cousins CE et al (2015) Hyperglycaemia potentiates the slowing of gastric emptying induced by exogenous GLP-1. Diabetes Care 38:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed Plummer MP, Jones KL, Cousins CE et al (2015) Hyperglycaemia potentiates the slowing of gastric emptying induced by exogenous GLP-1. Diabetes Care 38:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lund A, Knop FK, Vilsboll T (2014) Glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: differences and similarities. Eur J Intern Med 25:407–414CrossRefPubMed Lund A, Knop FK, Vilsboll T (2014) Glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: differences and similarities. Eur J Intern Med 25:407–414CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kjems LL, Holst JJ, Volund A, Madsbad S (2003) The influence of GLP-1 on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: effects on beta cell sensitivity in type 2 and nondiabetic participants. Diabetes 52:380–386CrossRefPubMed Kjems LL, Holst JJ, Volund A, Madsbad S (2003) The influence of GLP-1 on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: effects on beta cell sensitivity in type 2 and nondiabetic participants. Diabetes 52:380–386CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Christopoulos A, Kenakin T (2002) G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing. Pharmacol Rev 54:323–374CrossRefPubMed Christopoulos A, Kenakin T (2002) G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing. Pharmacol Rev 54:323–374CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vilsboll T, Toft-Nielsen MB, Krarup T, Madsbad S, Dinesen B, Holst JJ (2000) Evaluation of beta cell secretory capacity using glucagon-like peptide 1. Diabetes Care 23:807–812CrossRefPubMed Vilsboll T, Toft-Nielsen MB, Krarup T, Madsbad S, Dinesen B, Holst JJ (2000) Evaluation of beta cell secretory capacity using glucagon-like peptide 1. Diabetes Care 23:807–812CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The insulinotropic effect of pulsatile compared with continuous intravenous delivery of GLP-1
Authors
Mark P. Plummer
Palash Kar
Caroline E. Cousins
Kylie Lange
Marianne J. Chapman
Michael A. Nauck
Michael Horowitz
Juris J. Meier
Adam M. Deane
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3878-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Diabetologia 5/2016 Go to the issue