Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Article

Are current clinical trials in diabetes addressing important issues in diabetes care?

Authors: W. C. Lakey, K. Barnard, B. C. Batch, K. Chiswell, A. Tasneem, J. B. Green

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Clinical trials assessing interventions for treating and preventing diabetes mellitus and its complications are needed to inform evidence-based practice. To examine whether current studies adequately address these needs, we conducted a descriptive analysis of diabetes-related trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 to 2010.

Methods

From a dataset including 96,346 studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov downloaded on 27 September, 2010, a subset of 2,484 interventional trials was created by selecting trials with disease condition terms relevant to diabetes.

Results

Of the diabetes-related trials, 74.8% had a primarily therapeutic purpose while 10% were preventive. Listed interventions included drugs (63.1%) and behavioural (11.7%). Most trials were designed to enrol ≤500 (91.1%) or ≤100 (58.6%) participants, with mean/median times to completion of 1.8/1.4 years. Small percentages of trials targeted persons aged ≤18 years (3.7%) or ≥65 years (0.6%), while 30.8% excluded patients >65 years and the majority excluded those >75 years. Funding sources included industry (50.9%), NIH (7.5%) or other, with most being single-centre trials of other sponsorship (37.7%) or industry-funded multicentre studies (27.4%). A small number of trials (1.4%) listed primary outcomes including mortality or clinically significant cardiovascular complications. The distribution of trials by global region and US state does not correlate with prevalence of diabetes.

Conclusions/interpretation

The majority of diabetes-related trials include small numbers of participants, exclude those at the extremes of age, are of short duration, involve drug therapy rather than preventive or non-drug interventions and do not focus upon significant cardiovascular outcomes. Recently registered diabetes trials may not sufficiently address important diabetes care issues or involve affected populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 292:1363–1364PubMedCrossRef DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 292:1363–1364PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tasneem A, Aberle L, Ananth H et al (2012) The database for aggregate analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and subsequent regrouping by clinical specialty. PLoS One 7:e33677PubMedCrossRef Tasneem A, Aberle L, Ananth H et al (2012) The database for aggregate analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and subsequent regrouping by clinical specialty. PLoS One 7:e33677PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Alberti K, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2007) International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med 24:451–463PubMedCrossRef Alberti K, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2007) International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med 24:451–463PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fonseca V, Kirkman M, Darsow T, Ratner R (2012) The American Diabetes Association diabetes research perspective. Diabetes Care 35:1380–1387PubMedCrossRef Fonseca V, Kirkman M, Darsow T, Ratner R (2012) The American Diabetes Association diabetes research perspective. Diabetes Care 35:1380–1387PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403CrossRef Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403CrossRef
13.
go back to reference NAVIGATOR Study Group (2010) Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 362:1477–1490CrossRef NAVIGATOR Study Group (2010) Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 362:1477–1490CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R et al (2002) Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM Randomized Trial. Lancet 359:2072–2077PubMedCrossRef Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R et al (2002) Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM Randomized Trial. Lancet 359:2072–2077PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication) Trial Investigators (2006) Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 368:1096–1105CrossRef DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication) Trial Investigators (2006) Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 368:1096–1105CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986CrossRef Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986CrossRef
17.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ong KL, Cheung BM, Wong LY et al (2008) Prevalence, treatment, and control of diagnosed diabetes in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Ann Epidemiol 18:222–229PubMedCrossRef Ong KL, Cheung BM, Wong LY et al (2008) Prevalence, treatment, and control of diagnosed diabetes in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Ann Epidemiol 18:222–229PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW et al (2006) Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: Unites States, 1998–2002. Ann Intern Med 144:467–474CrossRef Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW et al (2006) Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: Unites States, 1998–2002. Ann Intern Med 144:467–474CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the Unites States, 2011. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 2011 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the Unites States, 2011. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 2011
22.
go back to reference Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF et al (2010) Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. JAMA 304:649–656PubMedCrossRef Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF et al (2010) Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. JAMA 304:649–656PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM et al (2006) Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 141:446–455PubMedCrossRef Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM et al (2006) Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 141:446–455PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Resnick HE, Valsania P, Phillips CL (1999) Diabetes mellitus and nontraumatic lower extremity amputation in black and white Americans: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1971–1992. Arch Intern Med 159:2470–2475PubMedCrossRef Resnick HE, Valsania P, Phillips CL (1999) Diabetes mellitus and nontraumatic lower extremity amputation in black and white Americans: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1971–1992. Arch Intern Med 159:2470–2475PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Liu JY et al (2002) Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. JAMA 287:2519–2527PubMedCrossRef Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Liu JY et al (2002) Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. JAMA 287:2519–2527PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith RJ, Nathan DM, Arslanian SA, Groop L, Rizza RA, Rotter JI (2010) Individualizing therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus based on patient characteristics: what we know and what we need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 95:1566–1574CrossRef Smith RJ, Nathan DM, Arslanian SA, Groop L, Rizza RA, Rotter JI (2010) Individualizing therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus based on patient characteristics: what we know and what we need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 95:1566–1574CrossRef
28.
go back to reference National Research Council (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC National Research Council (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
29.
go back to reference Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP et al (2008) Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:2545–2559PubMedCrossRef Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP et al (2008) Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:2545–2559PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T et al (2009) Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 360:129–139PubMedCrossRef Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T et al (2009) Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 360:129–139PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J et al (2008) Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:2560–2572PubMedCrossRef Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J et al (2008) Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:2560–2572PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Holman R, Paul S, Bethel A et al (2008) 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1577–1589PubMedCrossRef Holman R, Paul S, Bethel A et al (2008) 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1577–1589PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nissen SE, Wolski K (2007) Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 356:2457–2471PubMedCrossRef Nissen SE, Wolski K (2007) Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 356:2457–2471PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Smith U, Gale EA (2009) Does diabetes therapy influence the risk of cancer? Diabetologia 52:1699–1708PubMedCrossRef Smith U, Gale EA (2009) Does diabetes therapy influence the risk of cancer? Diabetologia 52:1699–1708PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EA (2009) The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52:1766–1777PubMedCrossRef Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EA (2009) The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52:1766–1777PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Meier C, Kraenzlin M, Bodmer M et al (2008) Use of thiazolidinediones and fracture risk. Arch Intern Med 168:820–825PubMedCrossRef Meier C, Kraenzlin M, Bodmer M et al (2008) Use of thiazolidinediones and fracture risk. Arch Intern Med 168:820–825PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Drucker DJ, Sherman SI, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB (2011) The safety of incretin-based therapies—review of the scientific evidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2027–2031PubMedCrossRef Drucker DJ, Sherman SI, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB (2011) The safety of incretin-based therapies—review of the scientific evidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2027–2031PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Califf R, Zarin D, Kramer J et al (2012) Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. JAMA 307:1838–1847PubMedCrossRef Califf R, Zarin D, Kramer J et al (2012) Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. JAMA 307:1838–1847PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are current clinical trials in diabetes addressing important issues in diabetes care?
Authors
W. C. Lakey
K. Barnard
B. C. Batch
K. Chiswell
A. Tasneem
J. B. Green
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2890-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Diabetologia 6/2013 Go to the issue