Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 7/2012

Open Access 01-07-2012 | Commentary

Reducing lower leg amputations in diabetes: a challenge for patients, healthcare providers and the healthcare system

Authors: N. C. Schaper, J. Apelqvist, K. Bakker

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Amputation of the lower limb is one of the most feared diabetic complications. It is associated with loss of mobility and a poor quality of life. Amputations result in high economic burden for the healthcare system. The financial cost is also high for patients and their families, particularly in countries that lack a comprehensive health service and/or have a low income. Losing a leg frequently implies financial ruin for a whole family in these countries; therefore, a reduction in diabetes-related amputations is a major global priority. Marked geographical variation in amputation rates has been reported within specific regions of an individual country and between countries. A coordinated healthcare system with a multidisciplinary approach is essential if the number of amputations is to be reduced. This commentary discusses how studies on the variation in amputation rates can help to identify barriers in the access or delivery of care with the aim of reducing the burden of diabetic foot disease.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jeffcoate WJ, van Houtum WH (2004) Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes. Diabetologia 47:2051–2058PubMedCrossRef Jeffcoate WJ, van Houtum WH (2004) Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes. Diabetologia 47:2051–2058PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J et al (2008) Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 51:747–755PubMedCrossRef Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J et al (2008) Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 51:747–755PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gershater MA, Löndahl M, Nyberg P et al (2009) Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study. Diabetologia 52:398–407PubMedCrossRef Gershater MA, Löndahl M, Nyberg P et al (2009) Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study. Diabetologia 52:398–407PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Schaper NC (2012) Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011. Diab Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):225–231CrossRef Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Schaper NC (2012) Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011. Diab Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):225–231CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chaturvedi N, Abbott CA, Whalley A et al (2002) Risk of diabetes-related amputation in South Asians vs Europeans in the UK. Diabet Med 19:99–104PubMedCrossRef Chaturvedi N, Abbott CA, Whalley A et al (2002) Risk of diabetes-related amputation in South Asians vs Europeans in the UK. Diabet Med 19:99–104PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Battum P, Schaper N, Prompers L et al (2011) Differences in minor amputation rate in diabetic foot disease throughout Europe are in part explained by differences in disease severity at presentation. Diabet Med 28:199–205PubMedCrossRef van Battum P, Schaper N, Prompers L et al (2011) Differences in minor amputation rate in diabetic foot disease throughout Europe are in part explained by differences in disease severity at presentation. Diabet Med 28:199–205PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fusilli D, Alviggi L, Seghieri G, de Bellis A (2007) Improvement of diabetic foot care after the implementation of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (ICDF): Results of a 5-year prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 75:153–158PubMedCrossRef Fusilli D, Alviggi L, Seghieri G, de Bellis A (2007) Improvement of diabetic foot care after the implementation of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (ICDF): Results of a 5-year prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 75:153–158PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Krishnan S, Nash F, Baker N et al (2008) Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined UK population: benefits of multidisciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care 31:99–101PubMedCrossRef Krishnan S, Nash F, Baker N et al (2008) Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined UK population: benefits of multidisciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care 31:99–101PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Canavan RJ, Unwin NC, Kelly WF, Connolly VM (2008) Diabetes and nondiabetes related lower extremity amputation incidence before and after the introduction of better organized diabetes foot care: continuous longitudinal monitoring using a standard method. Diabetes Care 31:459–463PubMedCrossRef Canavan RJ, Unwin NC, Kelly WF, Connolly VM (2008) Diabetes and nondiabetes related lower extremity amputation incidence before and after the introduction of better organized diabetes foot care: continuous longitudinal monitoring using a standard method. Diabetes Care 31:459–463PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Apelqvist J, Larsson J (2000) What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 16(Suppl 1):S75–S83PubMedCrossRef Apelqvist J, Larsson J (2000) What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 16(Suppl 1):S75–S83PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCabe CJ, Stevenson RC, Dolan AM (1998) Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme. Diab Med 15:80–84CrossRef McCabe CJ, Stevenson RC, Dolan AM (1998) Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme. Diab Med 15:80–84CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Peters EJ, Lavery LA, International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2001) Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 24:1442–1447PubMedCrossRef Peters EJ, Lavery LA, International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2001) Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 24:1442–1447PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA (2007) Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s diabetic foot infection classification system. Clin Infect Dis 44:562–565PubMedCrossRef Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA (2007) Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s diabetic foot infection classification system. Clin Infect Dis 44:562–565PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abbas ZG, Lutale JK, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ (2008) Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania. Diabet Med 25:134–137PubMedCrossRef Abbas ZG, Lutale JK, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ (2008) Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania. Diabet Med 25:134–137PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sotto A, Richard JL, Combescure C et al (2010) Beneficial effects of implementing guidelines on microbiology and costs of infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 53:2249–2255PubMedCrossRef Sotto A, Richard JL, Combescure C et al (2010) Beneficial effects of implementing guidelines on microbiology and costs of infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 53:2249–2255PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Connelly J, Airey M, Chell S (2001) Variation in clinical decision making is a partial explanation for geographical variation in lower extremity amputation rates. Br J Surg 88:529–535PubMedCrossRef Connelly J, Airey M, Chell S (2001) Variation in clinical decision making is a partial explanation for geographical variation in lower extremity amputation rates. Br J Surg 88:529–535PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hinchliffe RJ, Andros G, Apelqvist J et al (2012) A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):179–217PubMedCrossRef Hinchliffe RJ, Andros G, Apelqvist J et al (2012) A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):179–217PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J et al (2008) Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabet Med 25:700–707PubMedCrossRef Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J et al (2008) Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabet Med 25:700–707PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reducing lower leg amputations in diabetes: a challenge for patients, healthcare providers and the healthcare system
Authors
N. C. Schaper
J. Apelqvist
K. Bakker
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2588-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Diabetologia 7/2012 Go to the issue