Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 12/2009

01-12-2009 | Article

No evidence of increased risk of malignancies in patients with diabetes treated with insulin detemir: a meta-analysis

Authors: A. Dejgaard, H. Lynggaard, J. Råstam, M. Krogsgaard Thomsen

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 12/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Recent epidemiological studies suggest that treatment with insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin) may promote cancer growth. The present meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of cancer during treatment with insulin detemir (B29Lys(ε-tetradecanoyl),desB30 human insulin), another long-acting insulin analogue.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed in a population of 8,693 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, who were included in Novo Nordisk-sponsored, randomised and controlled diabetes trials of at least 12 weeks in duration that compared insulin detemir with NPH insulin or insulin glargine. In a blinded manner, the adverse events with suspected treatment-emergent malignant tumours were obtained from these studies under three system–organ classes: ‘Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)’, ‘Neoplasm’ and ‘Surgical and medical procedures’. Conditional ORs were estimated applying both the Mantel–Haenzel and Peto methods to ensure robustness of results.

Results

Separate analyses were performed for trials comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin and insulin detemir with insulin glargine. In the first analysis, 16 studies were included with a total of 3,983 patients treated with insulin detemir and 2,661 patients treated with NPH insulin. In the second analysis, five studies were included with a total of 1,219 patients treated with insulin detemir and 830 patients treated with insulin glargine. The estimated OR for a cancer diagnosis between NPH insulin and insulin detemir was statistically significantly >1, with the ratio favouring insulin detemir. There was a more than twofold higher cancer occurrence in the NPH insulin-treated population. For the insulin detemir comparison with insulin glargine, there was a non-significant difference in ORs in favour of insulin detemir.

Conclusions/interpretation

In these randomised controlled diabetes trials, patients treated with insulin detemir had a lower or similar occurrence of a cancer diagnosis compared with patients treated with NPH insulin or insulin glargine, respectively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hemkens LG, Grouven U, Bender R et al (2009) Risk of malignancies in patients with diabetes treated with human insulin or insulin analogues: a cohort study. Diabetologia 52:1732–1744CrossRefPubMed Hemkens LG, Grouven U, Bender R et al (2009) Risk of malignancies in patients with diabetes treated with human insulin or insulin analogues: a cohort study. Diabetologia 52:1732–1744CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jonasson JM, Ljung M, Talbäck M et al (2009) Insulin glargine use and short-term incidence of malignancies—a population-based follow-up study in Sweden. Diabetologia 52:1745–1754CrossRefPubMed Jonasson JM, Ljung M, Talbäck M et al (2009) Insulin glargine use and short-term incidence of malignancies—a population-based follow-up study in Sweden. Diabetologia 52:1745–1754CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EAM (2009) The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52:1766–1777CrossRefPubMed Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EAM (2009) The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52:1766–1777CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Smith U, Gale EAM (2009) Does diabetes therapy influence the risk of cancer? Diabetologia 52:1699–1708CrossRefPubMed Smith U, Gale EAM (2009) Does diabetes therapy influence the risk of cancer? Diabetologia 52:1699–1708CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Calle EE, Teras LR, Petrelli J, Thun MJ (2004) Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol 159:1160–1167CrossRefPubMed Coughlin SS, Calle EE, Teras LR, Petrelli J, Thun MJ (2004) Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol 159:1160–1167CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wideroff L, Gridley G, Mellemkjaer L et al (1997) Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of patients hospitalized with diabetes mellitus in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1360–1365CrossRefPubMed Wideroff L, Gridley G, Mellemkjaer L et al (1997) Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of patients hospitalized with diabetes mellitus in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1360–1365CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kurtzhals P, Schaeffer l, Sørensen A et al (2000) Correlations of receptor binding and metabolic and mitogenic potencies of insulin analogs designed for clinical use. Diabetes 49:999–1005CrossRefPubMed Kurtzhals P, Schaeffer l, Sørensen A et al (2000) Correlations of receptor binding and metabolic and mitogenic potencies of insulin analogs designed for clinical use. Diabetes 49:999–1005CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pollak MN, Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE (2004) Insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer 4:505–518CrossRefPubMed Pollak MN, Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE (2004) Insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer 4:505–518CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shukla A, Grisourd J, Ehemann V et al (2009) Analysis of signalling pathways related to cell proliferation stimulated by insulin analogs in human mammary epithelial cell lines. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:429–441CrossRefPubMed Shukla A, Grisourd J, Ehemann V et al (2009) Analysis of signalling pathways related to cell proliferation stimulated by insulin analogs in human mammary epithelial cell lines. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:429–441CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yee D (2001) Are the insulin-like growth factors relevant to cancer. Growth Horm IGF Res 11:339–345CrossRefPubMed Yee D (2001) Are the insulin-like growth factors relevant to cancer. Growth Horm IGF Res 11:339–345CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Whitehead A (2002) Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Whitehead A (2002) Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference The European Agency for the Evaluation of the Medicinal Products: Evaluation of medicines for human use. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Produces (CPMP). Points to consider on validity and interpretation of meta-analyses, and one pivotal study (2000) Available from www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/233099den.pdf, accessed 30 September 2009 The European Agency for the Evaluation of the Medicinal Products: Evaluation of medicines for human use. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Produces (CPMP). Points to consider on validity and interpretation of meta-analyses, and one pivotal study (2000) Available from www.​emea.​europa.​eu/​pdfs/​human/​ewp/​233099den.​pdf, accessed 30 September 2009
17.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefPubMed Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Colins R, Sleight P (1985) Beta-blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335–371CrossRefPubMed Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Colins R, Sleight P (1985) Beta-blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335–371CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Localio AR (2007) Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytic methods with rare events. Stat Med 26:53–77CrossRefPubMed Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Localio AR (2007) Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytic methods with rare events. Stat Med 26:53–77CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
No evidence of increased risk of malignancies in patients with diabetes treated with insulin detemir: a meta-analysis
Authors
A. Dejgaard
H. Lynggaard
J. Råstam
M. Krogsgaard Thomsen
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1568-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

Diabetologia 12/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.