Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Article

Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes: results from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS)

Authors: M. Raikou, A. McGuire, H. M. Colhoun, D. J. Betteridge, P. N. Durrington, G. A. Hitman, H. A. W. Neil, S. J. Livingstone, V. Charlton-Menys, J. H. Fuller, CARDS Investigators

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

We estimated the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin treatment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes using data from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS).

Subjects and methods

A total of 2,838 patients, who were aged 40 to 75 years and had type 2 diabetes without a documented history of cardiovascular disease and without elevated LDL-cholesterol, were recruited from 32 centres in the UK and Ireland and randomly allocated to atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n = 1,428) or placebo (n = 1,410). These subjects were followed-up for a median period of 3.9 years. Direct treatment costs and effectiveness were analysed to provide estimates of cost per endpoint-free year over the trial period for alternative definitions of endpoint, and of cost per life-year gained and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over a patient’s lifetime.

Results

Over the trial period, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated to be £7,608 per year free of any CARDS primary endpoint; the ICER was calculated to be £4,896 per year free of any cardiovascular endpoint and £4,120 per year free of any study endpoint. Over lifetime, the incremental cost per life-year gained was £5,107 and the cost per QALY was £6,471 (costs and benefits both discounted at 3.5%).

Conclusions/interpretation

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin is a cost-effective intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes, with the ICER for this intervention falling within the current acceptance threshold (£20,000 per QALY) specified by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference British Medical Association (2004) Diabetes mellitus an update for healthcare professionals. BMA, London British Medical Association (2004) Diabetes mellitus an update for healthcare professionals. BMA, London
2.
go back to reference Barnett AH, O’Gara G (2004) Churchill’s in clinical practice series: diabetes and the heart. Churchill Livingstone, Oxford Barnett AH, O’Gara G (2004) Churchill’s in clinical practice series: diabetes and the heart. Churchill Livingstone, Oxford
3.
go back to reference Singer DE, Moulton AW, Nathan DM (1989) Diabetic myocardial infarction. Interaction of diabetes with other preinfarction risk factors. Diabetes 38:350–357PubMed Singer DE, Moulton AW, Nathan DM (1989) Diabetic myocardial infarction. Interaction of diabetes with other preinfarction risk factors. Diabetes 38:350–357PubMed
4.
go back to reference Banerji MA (2005) Statins and the prevention of stroke in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 5:1–3PubMed Banerji MA (2005) Statins and the prevention of stroke in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 5:1–3PubMed
5.
go back to reference Pimpinella G, Bertini Malgarini R, Martini N (2004) Statins for patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 364:1933PubMedCrossRef Pimpinella G, Bertini Malgarini R, Martini N (2004) Statins for patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 364:1933PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gami AS, Montori VM, Erwin PJ, Khan MA, Smith SA; Evidence in Diabetes Enquiry System (EVIDENS) Research Group (2003) Systematic review of lipid lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in diabetes. BMJ 326:528–529CrossRef Gami AS, Montori VM, Erwin PJ, Khan MA, Smith SA; Evidence in Diabetes Enquiry System (EVIDENS) Research Group (2003) Systematic review of lipid lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in diabetes. BMJ 326:528–529CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN et al; CARDS investigators (2004) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364:685–696PubMedCrossRef Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN et al; CARDS investigators (2004) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364:685–696PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference British National Formulary (2004) BMA and RPSUK, London British National Formulary (2004) BMA and RPSUK, London
9.
go back to reference Curtis L, Netten A (2004) Unit costs of health and social care. PSSRU, University of Kent, Canterbury Curtis L, Netten A (2004) Unit costs of health and social care. PSSRU, University of Kent, Canterbury
11.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal (reference 0515) National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal (reference 0515)
12.
go back to reference Roper N, Bilous R, Kelly W, Unwin NC, Connelly VM (2001) Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population-based study. BMJ 322:1389–1393CrossRef Roper N, Bilous R, Kelly W, Unwin NC, Connelly VM (2001) Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population-based study. BMJ 322:1389–1393CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Strandberg TE, Pyörälä K, Cook TJ et al (2004) Mortality and incidence of cancer during 10-year follow-up of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 364:771–777PubMedCrossRef Strandberg TE, Pyörälä K, Cook TJ et al (2004) Mortality and incidence of cancer during 10-year follow-up of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 364:771–777PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A et al; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (2004) A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) outcomes model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia 47:1747–1759PubMedCrossRef Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A et al; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (2004) A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) outcomes model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia 47:1747–1759PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R (2002) Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Mak 22:340–349CrossRef Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R (2002) Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Mak 22:340–349CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fieller EC (1954) Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 16:175–185 Fieller EC (1954) Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 16:175–185
17.
go back to reference Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP et al; Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group (2005) High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294:2437–2445PubMedCrossRef Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP et al; Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group (2005) High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294:2437–2445PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stevens R, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM; United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (2001) The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci (Lond) 101:671–679CrossRef Stevens R, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM; United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (2001) The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci (Lond) 101:671–679CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Department of Health (2000) Coronary heart disease: national service framework for coronary heart disease—modern standards and service models. Department of Health, London Department of Health (2000) Coronary heart disease: national service framework for coronary heart disease—modern standards and service models. Department of Health, London
20.
go back to reference No authors given (1998) Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association. Heart 80:S1–S29 No authors given (1998) Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association. Heart 80:S1–S29
21.
go back to reference Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360:7–22CrossRef Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360:7–22CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR et al; ASCOT investigators (2003) Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1149–1158PubMedCrossRef Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR et al; ASCOT investigators (2003) Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1149–1158PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cowie M, Betteridge J, Hobbs R et al (2003) Lipid lowering. Why does the UK lag behind? Update 14 August 2003, pp 226–230 Cowie M, Betteridge J, Hobbs R et al (2003) Lipid lowering. Why does the UK lag behind? Update 14 August 2003, pp 226–230
24.
go back to reference Mihaylova B, Briggs A, Armitage J, Parish S, Gray A, Collins R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2005) Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in people at different levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20,536 individuals. Lancet 365:1779–1785PubMedCrossRef Mihaylova B, Briggs A, Armitage J, Parish S, Gray A, Collins R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2005) Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in people at different levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20,536 individuals. Lancet 365:1779–1785PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes: results from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS)
Authors
M. Raikou
A. McGuire
H. M. Colhoun
D. J. Betteridge
P. N. Durrington
G. A. Hitman
H. A. W. Neil
S. J. Livingstone
V. Charlton-Menys
J. H. Fuller
CARDS Investigators
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0561-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Diabetologia 4/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.