Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Wound Infection | Original Article

Intermediate-term evaluation of interval appendectomy in the pediatric population

Authors: Yunfei Zhang, Qin Deng, Hai Zhu, Bailin Chen, Lin Qiu, Chunbao Guo

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Initial non-operative management of children with complicated appendicitis has been well studied but when comparing emergency procedures the long-term effectiveness of interval appendectomy remains undefined. This study aimed to determine the effects of interval appendectomy from the perspective of long-term follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with complicated appendicitis between 2010 and 2017 was performed. The medical records of 471 patients with initial non-operative therapy and 377 patients treated with emergency appendectomy who served as controls were reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for any potential selection bias in the two strategies. A comparison of the clinical outcomes, including short- and long-term postoperative complications, was conducted in the 348 matched patients.

Results

On presentation, there were no differences in age, weight, sex distribution, white blood cell (WBC), or procalcitonin (PCT) between the two groups, except for days of symptoms. The patients undergoing emergency appendectomy had a high American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score (p = 0.002). The patients who underwent initial non-operative therapy had a lower complication rate, including surgical wound infection [odds ratio (OR), 3.77; 95% CI 2.59–5.50; p < 0.001) and postoperative peritonitis or abscess (OR, 3.81; 95% CI 1.79–8.12; p < 0.001) than those who underwent emergency appendectomy. Furthermore, the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) was lower in patients who underwent initial non-operative therapy than in patients who underwent emergency appendectomy (OR, 4.6; 95% CI 0.99–21.41; p = 0.032).

Conclusions

Initial non-operative therapy with interval appendectomy was feasible for most patients with appendiceal abscesses and had advantages in terms of postoperative complications, especially regarding long-term obstruction events. Therefore, initial non-operative therapy with interval appendectomy should be considered the first treatment of choice for pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hanson AL, Crosby RD, Basson MD. Patient preferences for surgery or antibiotics for the treatment of acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:471–8.CrossRef Hanson AL, Crosby RD, Basson MD. Patient preferences for surgery or antibiotics for the treatment of acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:471–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Al-Kurd A, Mizrahi I, Siam B, et al. Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2018;225:90–4.CrossRef Al-Kurd A, Mizrahi I, Siam B, et al. Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2018;225:90–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kaminski A, Liu IL, Applebaum H, et al. Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial non-operative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2005;140:897–901.CrossRef Kaminski A, Liu IL, Applebaum H, et al. Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial non-operative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2005;140:897–901.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Janik JS, Ein SH, Shandling B, Simpson JS, Stephens CA. Nonsurgical management of appendiceal mass in late presenting children. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:574–6.CrossRef Janik JS, Ein SH, Shandling B, Simpson JS, Stephens CA. Nonsurgical management of appendiceal mass in late presenting children. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:574–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Talishinskiy T, Limberg J, Ginsburg H, et al. Factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:1174–6.CrossRef Talishinskiy T, Limberg J, Ginsburg H, et al. Factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:1174–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Albright JB, Fakhre GP, Nields WW, et al. Incidental appendectomy: 18-year pathologic survey and cost effectiveness in the nonmanaged-care setting. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:298–306.CrossRef Albright JB, Fakhre GP, Nields WW, et al. Incidental appendectomy: 18-year pathologic survey and cost effectiveness in the nonmanaged-care setting. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:298–306.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2007;246:741–748. Andersson RE, Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2007;246:741–748.
8.
go back to reference Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:11670. Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:11670.
9.
go back to reference Darwazeh G, Cunningham SC, Kowdley GC. A systematic review of perforated appendicitis and phlegmon: interval appendectomy or wait-and-see? Am Surg. 2016;82:11–5.CrossRef Darwazeh G, Cunningham SC, Kowdley GC. A systematic review of perforated appendicitis and phlegmon: interval appendectomy or wait-and-see? Am Surg. 2016;82:11–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cheng O, Cheng L, Burjonrappa S. Facilitating factors in same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. J Surg Res. 2018;229:145–9.CrossRef Cheng O, Cheng L, Burjonrappa S. Facilitating factors in same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. J Surg Res. 2018;229:145–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Kelly A, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone in laparoscopic appendectomy: is dilution the solution to pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Innov. 2018;25:174–82.CrossRef Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Kelly A, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone in laparoscopic appendectomy: is dilution the solution to pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Innov. 2018;25:174–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference St Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, et al. Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial non-operative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:236–40.CrossRef St Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, et al. Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial non-operative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:236–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, et al. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:939–42.CrossRef Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, et al. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:939–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lugo JZ, Avgerinos DV, Lefkowitz AJ, et al. Can interval appendectomy be justified following conservative treatment of perforated acute appendicitis? J Surg Res. 2010;164:91–4.CrossRef Lugo JZ, Avgerinos DV, Lefkowitz AJ, et al. Can interval appendectomy be justified following conservative treatment of perforated acute appendicitis? J Surg Res. 2010;164:91–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Muensterer OJ, Puga Nougues C, Adibe OO, et al. Appendectomy using single-incision pediatric endosurgery for acute and perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3201–4.CrossRef Muensterer OJ, Puga Nougues C, Adibe OO, et al. Appendectomy using single-incision pediatric endosurgery for acute and perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3201–4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Young KA, Neuhaus NM, Fluck M, et al. Outcomes of complicated appendicitis: Is conservative management as smooth as it seems? Am J Surg. 2018;215:586–92.CrossRef Young KA, Neuhaus NM, Fluck M, et al. Outcomes of complicated appendicitis: Is conservative management as smooth as it seems? Am J Surg. 2018;215:586–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tannoury J, Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3942–50.CrossRef Tannoury J, Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3942–50.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Puapong D, Lee SL, Haigh PI, et al. Routine interval appendectomy in children is not indicated. J Ped Surg. 2007;42:1500–3.CrossRef Puapong D, Lee SL, Haigh PI, et al. Routine interval appendectomy in children is not indicated. J Ped Surg. 2007;42:1500–3.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ouaïssi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N, et al. Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg. 2012;149:e104–e114114.CrossRef Ouaïssi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N, et al. Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg. 2012;149:e104–e114114.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cao J, Tao F, Xing H, et al. Laparoscopic procedure is not independently associated with the development of intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy: a multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:409–14.CrossRef Cao J, Tao F, Xing H, et al. Laparoscopic procedure is not independently associated with the development of intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy: a multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:409–14.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaminski A, Liu IA, Applebaum H, et al. Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2005;140:897–901.CrossRef Kaminski A, Liu IA, Applebaum H, et al. Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2005;140:897–901.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM. Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2009;7:250–2.CrossRef Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM. Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2009;7:250–2.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference LaPlant MB, Saltzman DA, Rosen JI, et al. Standardized irrigation technique reduces intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;54:728–32.CrossRef LaPlant MB, Saltzman DA, Rosen JI, et al. Standardized irrigation technique reduces intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;54:728–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–73.CrossRef Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–73.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Keckler SJ, Tsao K, Sharp SW, et al. Resource utilization and outcomes from percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:977–80.CrossRef Keckler SJ, Tsao K, Sharp SW, et al. Resource utilization and outcomes from percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:977–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intermediate-term evaluation of interval appendectomy in the pediatric population
Authors
Yunfei Zhang
Qin Deng
Hai Zhu
Bailin Chen
Lin Qiu
Chunbao Guo
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01277-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2021 Go to the issue