Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2021

01-06-2021 | Original Article

Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services

Authors: Philip Christian Nolte, Davut Deniz Uzun, David Häske, Jeronimo Weerts, Matthias Münzberg, Adrian Rittmann, Paul Alfred Grützner, Michael Kreinest

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

It remains controversial how to immobilize the cervical spine (CS) in trauma patients. Therefore, we analyzed different CS immobilization techniques during prehospital patient transport.

Methods

In this explorative, biomechanical analysis of immobilization techniques conducted in a standardized setting, we recorded CS motion during patient transport using a wireless human motion tracker on a volunteer. To interpret spinal movement a benchmark called motionscore (MS) was developed based on biomechanics of the injured spine.

Results

We found the best spinal motion restriction using a spine board, head blocks and immobilization straps with and without a cervical collar (CC) (MS 45 vs. 27). Spinal motion restriction on a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks was superior to no CC or head blocks (MS 103 vs. 152). An inclined vacuum mattress was more effective with head blocks than without (MS 124 vs. 187). Minimal immobilization with an ambulance cot, CC, pillow and tape was slightly superior to a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks (MS 92 vs. 103). Minimal immobilization without CC showed the lowest spinal motion restriction (MS 517).

Conclusions

We suggest an immobilization procedure customized to the individual situation. A spine board should be used whenever spinal motion restriction is indicated and the utilization is possible. In some cases, CS immobilization by a vacuum mattress with CC and head blocks could be more beneficial. In an unstable status of the patient, minimal immobilization may be performed using an ambulance cot, pillow, CC and tape to minimize time on scene caused by immobilization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S2–12.CrossRef Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S2–12.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bernhard M, Gries A, Kremer P, Böttiger BW. Spinal cord injury (SCI)—prehospital management. Resuscitation. 2005;66:127–39.CrossRef Bernhard M, Gries A, Kremer P, Böttiger BW. Spinal cord injury (SCI)—prehospital management. Resuscitation. 2005;66:127–39.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, Rivera-Rivera EJ, Frederiksen SM. Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997;1:11–5.CrossRef Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, Rivera-Rivera EJ, Frederiksen SM. Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997;1:11–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 2):22–34.CrossRef Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 2):22–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung. 2016; AWMF-Register Nr. 012/019 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung. 2016; AWMF-Register Nr. 012/019
6.
go back to reference National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) (2016) Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. NICE Guideline, No. 41. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) (2016) Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. NICE Guideline, No. 41. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK).
7.
go back to reference Davies G, Deakin C, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury. 1996;27:647–9.CrossRef Davies G, Deakin C, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury. 1996;27:647–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hunt K, Hallworth S, Smith M. The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:511–3.CrossRef Hunt K, Hallworth S, Smith M. The effects of rigid collar placement on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:511–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman SJ, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:31–6.CrossRef Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman SJ, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:31–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Swartz EE, Tucker WS, Nowak M, Roberto J, Hollingworth A, Decoster LC, et al. Prehospital cervical spine motion: immobilization versus spine motion restriction. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:630–6.CrossRef Swartz EE, Tucker WS, Nowak M, Roberto J, Hollingworth A, Decoster LC, et al. Prehospital cervical spine motion: immobilization versus spine motion restriction. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:630–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ham W, Schoonhoven L, Schuurmans MJ, Leenen LPH. Pressure ulcers from spinal immobilization in trauma patients: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1131–41.CrossRef Ham W, Schoonhoven L, Schuurmans MJ, Leenen LPH. Pressure ulcers from spinal immobilization in trauma patients: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1131–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pernik MN, Seidel HH, Blalock RE, Burgess AR, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR, et al. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Injury. 2016;47:1801–5.CrossRef Pernik MN, Seidel HH, Blalock RE, Burgess AR, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR, et al. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Injury. 2016;47:1801–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:344–8.CrossRef Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:344–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:347–52.CrossRef Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:347–52.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liao S, Schneider NRE, Hüttlin P, Grützner PA, Weilbacher F, Matschke S, et al. Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195215.CrossRef Liao S, Schneider NRE, Hüttlin P, Grützner PA, Weilbacher F, Matschke S, et al. Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195215.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, Fallat ME, Salomone JP, Dodd J, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient—a joint position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:659–61.CrossRef Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, Fallat ME, Salomone JP, Dodd J, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient—a joint position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:659–61.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I. Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD002803. Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I. Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD002803.
18.
go back to reference Beisemann N, Noweski A, Kreinest M. Wirbelsäulenimmobilisation bei Patienten mit schwerem Schädel-Hirn-Trauma—Einfach, praktisch. Notfall Rettungsmed. 2018;21:402–5.CrossRef Beisemann N, Noweski A, Kreinest M. Wirbelsäulenimmobilisation bei Patienten mit schwerem Schädel-Hirn-Trauma—Einfach, praktisch. Notfall Rettungsmed. 2018;21:402–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kreinest M, Gliwitzky B, Schüler S, Grützner PA, Münzberg M. Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:71.CrossRef Kreinest M, Gliwitzky B, Schüler S, Grützner PA, Münzberg M. Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:71.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rahmatalla S, DeShaw J, Stilley J, Denning G, Jennissen C. Comparing the efficacy of methods for immobilizing the cervical spine. Spine. 2019;44:32–40.CrossRef Rahmatalla S, DeShaw J, Stilley J, Denning G, Jennissen C. Comparing the efficacy of methods for immobilizing the cervical spine. Spine. 2019;44:32–40.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mahshidfar B, Mofidi M, Yari A-R, Mehrsorosh S. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28:462–5.CrossRef Mahshidfar B, Mofidi M, Yari A-R, Mehrsorosh S. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28:462–5.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wampler DA, Pineda C, Polk J, Kidd E, Leboeuf D, Flores M, et al. The long spine board does not reduce lateral motion during transport–a randomized healthy volunteer crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:717–21.CrossRef Wampler DA, Pineda C, Polk J, Kidd E, Leboeuf D, Flores M, et al. The long spine board does not reduce lateral motion during transport–a randomized healthy volunteer crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:717–21.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:369–72.CrossRef Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:369–72.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Etier BE, Norte GE, Gleason MM, Richter DL, Pugh KF, Thomson KB, et al. A comparison of cervical spine motion after immobilization with a traditional spine board and full-body vacuum-mattress splint. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117744757.CrossRef Etier BE, Norte GE, Gleason MM, Richter DL, Pugh KF, Thomson KB, et al. A comparison of cervical spine motion after immobilization with a traditional spine board and full-body vacuum-mattress splint. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117744757.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Luscombe MD, Williams JL. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:476–8.CrossRef Luscombe MD, Williams JL. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:476–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Prasarn ML, Hyldmo PK, Zdziarski LA, Loewy E, Dubose D, Horodyski M, et al. Comparison of the vacuum mattress versus the spine board alone for immobilization of the cervical spine injured patient: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Spine. 2017;42:E1398–E14021402.CrossRef Prasarn ML, Hyldmo PK, Zdziarski LA, Loewy E, Dubose D, Horodyski M, et al. Comparison of the vacuum mattress versus the spine board alone for immobilization of the cervical spine injured patient: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Spine. 2017;42:E1398–E14021402.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Akkuş Ş, Çorbacıoğlu ŞK, Çevik Y, Akıncı E, Uzunosmanoğlu H. Effects of spinal immobilization at 20° on respiratory functions. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:1959–62.CrossRef Akkuş Ş, Çorbacıoğlu ŞK, Çevik Y, Akıncı E, Uzunosmanoğlu H. Effects of spinal immobilization at 20° on respiratory functions. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:1959–62.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Haut ER, Kalish BT, Efron DT, Haider AH, Stevens KA, Kieninger AN, et al. Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? J Trauma. 2010;68(115):120–121. Haut ER, Kalish BT, Efron DT, Haider AH, Stevens KA, Kieninger AN, et al. Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? J Trauma. 2010;68(115):120–121.
29.
go back to reference Velopulos CG, Shihab HM, Lottenberg L, Feinman M, Raja A, Salomone J, et al. Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84:736–44.CrossRef Velopulos CG, Shihab HM, Lottenberg L, Feinman M, Raja A, Salomone J, et al. Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84:736–44.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services
Authors
Philip Christian Nolte
Davut Deniz Uzun
David Häske
Jeronimo Weerts
Matthias Münzberg
Adrian Rittmann
Paul Alfred Grützner
Michael Kreinest
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01143-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue