Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 5/2017

Open Access 01-05-2017 | Original Article

Fully automated VMAT treatment planning for advanced-stage NSCLC patients

Authors: Giuseppe Della Gala, M.Sc., Maarten L. P. Dirkx, Ph.D., Nienke Hoekstra, M.D., Dennie Fransen, RTT, Nico Lanconelli, Ph.D., Marjan van de Pol, M.D., Ben J. M. Heijmen, Ph.D., Steven F. Petit, Ph.D.

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a fully automated procedure for multicriterial volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning (autoVMAT) for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with curative intent.

Materials and methods

After configuring the developed autoVMAT system for NSCLC, autoVMAT plans were compared with manually generated clinically delivered intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for 41 patients. AutoVMAT plans were also compared to manually generated VMAT plans in the absence of time pressure. For 16 patients with reduced planning target volume (PTV) dose prescription in the clinical IMRT plan (to avoid violation of organs at risk tolerances), the potential for dose escalation with autoVMAT was explored.

Results

Two physicians evaluated 35/41 autoVMAT plans (85%) as clinically acceptable. Compared to the manually generated IMRT plans, autoVMAT plans showed statistically significant improved PTV coverage (V95% increased by 1.1% ± 1.1%), higher dose conformity (R50 reduced by 12.2% ± 12.7%), and reduced mean lung, heart, and esophagus doses (reductions of 0.9 Gy ± 1.0 Gy, 1.5 Gy ± 1.8 Gy, 3.6 Gy ± 2.8 Gy, respectively, all p < 0.001). To render the six remaining autoVMAT plans clinically acceptable, a dosimetrist needed less than 10 min hands-on time for fine-tuning. AutoVMAT plans were also considered equivalent or better than manually optimized VMAT plans. For 6/16 patients, autoVMAT allowed tumor dose escalation of 5–10 Gy.

Conclusion

Clinically deliverable, high-quality autoVMAT plans can be generated fully automatically for the vast majority of advanced-stage NSCLC patients. For a subset of patients, autoVMAT allowed for tumor dose escalation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Quan EM, Chang JY, Liao Z et al (2012) Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e69–76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quan EM, Chang JY, Liao Z et al (2012) Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e69–76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Bezjak A, Rumble RB, Rodrigues G, Hope A, Warde P, Members of the IIEP (2012) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 24:508–520CrossRef Bezjak A, Rumble RB, Rodrigues G, Hope A, Warde P, Members of the IIEP (2012) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 24:508–520CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, Al-Mamgani A, Incrocci L, Heijmen BJ (2014) Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1175–1179CrossRefPubMed Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, Al-Mamgani A, Incrocci L, Heijmen BJ (2014) Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1175–1179CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tol JP, Dahele M, Delaney AR, Doornaert P, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WF (2016) Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Med Phys 43:1818CrossRefPubMed Tol JP, Dahele M, Delaney AR, Doornaert P, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WF (2016) Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Med Phys 43:1818CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zhang X, Li X, Quan EM, Pan X, Li Y (2011) A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer. Phys Med Biol 56:3873–3893CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Li X, Quan EM, Pan X, Li Y (2011) A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer. Phys Med Biol 56:3873–3893CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, Fransen D, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ (2013) Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:866–872CrossRefPubMed Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, Fransen D, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ (2013) Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:866–872CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Amit G, Purdie TG (2015) Automated planning of breast radiotherapy using cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys 42:770–779CrossRefPubMed Amit G, Purdie TG (2015) Automated planning of breast radiotherapy using cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys 42:770–779CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sharpe MB, Moore KL, Orton CG (2014) Point/Counterpoint: Within the next ten years treatment planning will become fully automated without the need for human intervention. Med Phys 41:120601CrossRefPubMed Sharpe MB, Moore KL, Orton CG (2014) Point/Counterpoint: Within the next ten years treatment planning will become fully automated without the need for human intervention. Med Phys 41:120601CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wu B, McNutt T, Zahurak M et al (2012) Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e647–e653CrossRefPubMed Wu B, McNutt T, Zahurak M et al (2012) Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e647–e653CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fiege J, McCurdy B, Potrebko P, Champion H, Cull A (2011) PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning. Med Phys 38:5217–5229CrossRefPubMed Fiege J, McCurdy B, Potrebko P, Champion H, Cull A (2011) PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning. Med Phys 38:5217–5229CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Boylan C, Rowbottom C (2014) A bias-free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy – application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4530CrossRefPubMed Boylan C, Rowbottom C (2014) A bias-free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy – application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4530CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fogliata A, Belosi F, Clivio A et al (2014) On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 113:385–391CrossRefPubMed Fogliata A, Belosi F, Clivio A et al (2014) On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 113:385–391CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kamran S, Mueller BS, Paetzold P et al (2016) Multi-criteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in a planning study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for RTOG 1308-eligible non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 116:515–520CrossRef Kamran S, Mueller BS, Paetzold P et al (2016) Multi-criteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in a planning study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for RTOG 1308-eligible non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 116:515–520CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sharfo AW, Voet PW, Breedveld S, Mens JW, Hoogeman MS, Heijmen BJ (2015) Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. Radiother Oncol 114:395–401CrossRefPubMed Sharfo AW, Voet PW, Breedveld S, Mens JW, Hoogeman MS, Heijmen BJ (2015) Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. Radiother Oncol 114:395–401CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Krayenbuehl J, Norton I, Studer G, Guckenberger M (2015) Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck. Radiat Oncol 10:226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krayenbuehl J, Norton I, Studer G, Guckenberger M (2015) Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck. Radiat Oncol 10:226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hazell I, Bzdusek K, Kumar P et al (2016) Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(1):272–282CrossRefPubMed Hazell I, Bzdusek K, Kumar P et al (2016) Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(1):272–282CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Breedveld S, Storchi PR, Voet PW, Heijmen BJ (2012) iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys 39:951–963CrossRefPubMed Breedveld S, Storchi PR, Voet PW, Heijmen BJ (2012) iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys 39:951–963CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fully automated VMAT treatment planning for advanced-stage NSCLC patients
Authors
Giuseppe Della Gala, M.Sc.
Maarten L. P. Dirkx, Ph.D.
Nienke Hoekstra, M.D.
Dennie Fransen, RTT
Nico Lanconelli, Ph.D.
Marjan van de Pol, M.D.
Ben J. M. Heijmen, Ph.D.
Steven F. Petit, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1121-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 5/2017 Go to the issue