Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original article

Incidental dose to coronary arteries is higher in prone than in supine whole breast irradiation

A dosimetric comparison in adjuvant radiotherapy of early stage breast cancer

Authors: Florian Würschmidt, Solveigh Stoltenberg, Matthias Kretschmer, Cordula Petersen

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Sparing of normal lung is best achieved in prone whole breast irradiation (WBI). However, exposure of the heart and coronary arteries might increase due to anterior movement of the heart in prone WBI.

Patients and methods

Treatment plans of 46 patients with large breasts irradiated for mammary cancer after breast-conserving surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The average treated breast volume of right-sided breasts (n = 33) was 1,804 ccm and 1,500 ccm for left-sided breasts (n = 13). The majority had invasive cancer (96 %) of which 61 % were pT1 and 39 % pT2 tumors. All patients received radiation therapy to the breast only. For three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning, all patients underwent a noncontrast-enhanced CT in the supine position with a wingboard and a second CT in the prone position using a prone breastboard. Nontarget volumes of the lung, heart, and coronary arteries were contoured. A total dose of 50.4 Gy was prescribed to the breast only. Differences were calculated for each patient and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Treatment of left-sided breasts resulted in similar average mean heart doses in prone versus supine WBI (4.16 vs. 4.01 Gy; p = 0.70). The left anterior descending artery (LAD) had significantly higher dose exposure in left versus right WBI independent of position. Prone WBI always resulted in significantly higher exposures of the right circumflex artery (RCA) and LAD as compared to supine WBI. In left WBI, the mean LADprone was 33.5 Gy vs. LADsupine of 25.6 Gy (p = 0.0051). The V20prone of the LAD was 73.6 % vs. V20supine 50.4 % (p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

The heart dose is not different between supine and prone WBI. However, in left WBI the incidental dose to the LAD with clinically relevant doses can be significantly higher in prone WBI. This is discussed controversially in the literature as it might depend on contouring and treatment techniques. We recommend contouring of LAD if patients are treated in prone WBI and evaluation of alternative treatment techniques for optimal sparing of coronary arteries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Darby S, McGale P, Correa C et al (2011) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378:1707–1716PubMedCrossRef Darby S, McGale P, Correa C et al (2011) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378:1707–1716PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cross MA, Elson HR, Aron BS (1989) Breast conservation radiation therapy technique for women with large breasts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:199–203PubMedCrossRef Cross MA, Elson HR, Aron BS (1989) Breast conservation radiation therapy technique for women with large breasts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:199–203PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stegman LD, Beal KP, Hunt MA et al (2007) Long-term clinical outcomes of whole-breast irradiation delivered in the prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:73–81PubMedCrossRef Stegman LD, Beal KP, Hunt MA et al (2007) Long-term clinical outcomes of whole-breast irradiation delivered in the prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:73–81PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Griem KL, Fetherston P, Kuznetsova M et al (2003) Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:891–899PubMedCrossRef Griem KL, Fetherston P, Kuznetsova M et al (2003) Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:891–899PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chino JP, Marks LB (2008) Prone positioning causes the heart to be displaced anteriorly within the thorax: implications for breast cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:916–920PubMedCrossRef Chino JP, Marks LB (2008) Prone positioning causes the heart to be displaced anteriorly within the thorax: implications for breast cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:916–920PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schubert LK, Gondi V, Sengbusch E et al (2011) Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy. Radiother Oncol 100:241–246PubMedCrossRef Schubert LK, Gondi V, Sengbusch E et al (2011) Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy. Radiother Oncol 100:241–246PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jagsi R, Moran J, Marsh R et al (2010) Evaluation of four techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for comprehensive locoregional irradiation of breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1594–1603PubMedCrossRef Jagsi R, Moran J, Marsh R et al (2010) Evaluation of four techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for comprehensive locoregional irradiation of breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1594–1603PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taylor CW, Brønnum D, Darby SC et al (2011) Cardiac dose estimates from Danish and Swedish breast cancer radiotherapy during 1977–2001. Radiother Oncol 100:176–183PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Taylor CW, Brønnum D, Darby SC et al (2011) Cardiac dose estimates from Danish and Swedish breast cancer radiotherapy during 1977–2001. Radiother Oncol 100:176–183PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lohr F, El-Haddad M, Dobler B et al (2009) Potential effect of robust and simple IMRT approach for left-sided breast cancer on cardiac mortality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:73–80PubMedCrossRef Lohr F, El-Haddad M, Dobler B et al (2009) Potential effect of robust and simple IMRT approach for left-sided breast cancer on cardiac mortality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:73–80PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P et al (2013) Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368:987–998PubMedCrossRef Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P et al (2013) Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368:987–998PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lymberis SC, deWyngaert JK, Parhar P et al (2012) Prospective assessment of optimal individual position (prone versus supine) for breast radiotherapy: volumetric and dosimetric correlations in 100 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:902–909PubMedCrossRef Lymberis SC, deWyngaert JK, Parhar P et al (2012) Prospective assessment of optimal individual position (prone versus supine) for breast radiotherapy: volumetric and dosimetric correlations in 100 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:902–909PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Varga Z, Hideghéty K, Mezo T et al (2009) Individual positioning: a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:94–100PubMedCrossRef Varga Z, Hideghéty K, Mezo T et al (2009) Individual positioning: a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:94–100PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kirby AM, Evans PM, Donovan EM et al (2010) Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial-breast radiotherapy: a comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 96:178–184PubMedCrossRef Kirby AM, Evans PM, Donovan EM et al (2010) Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial-breast radiotherapy: a comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 96:178–184PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buijsen J, Jager JJ, Bovendeerd J et al (2007) Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 82(3):337–340PubMedCrossRef Buijsen J, Jager JJ, Bovendeerd J et al (2007) Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 82(3):337–340PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mulliez T, Veldeman L, van Greveling A et al (2013) Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with large breasts: a randomized trial comparing prone and supine positions. Radiother Oncol 108:203–208PubMedCrossRef Mulliez T, Veldeman L, van Greveling A et al (2013) Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with large breasts: a randomized trial comparing prone and supine positions. Radiother Oncol 108:203–208PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pasler M, Georg D, Bartelt S et al (2013) Node-positive left-sided breast cancer: does VMAT improve treatment plan quality with respect to IMRT? Strahlenther Onkol 189:380–386PubMedCrossRef Pasler M, Georg D, Bartelt S et al (2013) Node-positive left-sided breast cancer: does VMAT improve treatment plan quality with respect to IMRT? Strahlenther Onkol 189:380–386PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Subramaniam S, Thirumalaiswamy S, Srinivas C et al (2012) Chest wall radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and the potential role of flattening filter free photon beams. Strahlenther Onkol 188:484–490PubMedCrossRef Subramaniam S, Thirumalaiswamy S, Srinivas C et al (2012) Chest wall radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and the potential role of flattening filter free photon beams. Strahlenther Onkol 188:484–490PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Jozsef G et al (2014) Risk and risk reduction of major coronary events associated with contemporary breast radiotherapy. JAMA Intern Med 174:158–160 Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Jozsef G et al (2014) Risk and risk reduction of major coronary events associated with contemporary breast radiotherapy. JAMA Intern Med 174:158–160
20.
go back to reference Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry SF et al (2010) Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol 55:6999–7008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry SF et al (2010) Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol 55:6999–7008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Correa CR, Das IJ, Litt HI et al (2008) Association between tangential beam treatment parameters and cardiac abnormalities after definitive radiation treatment for left-sided breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:508–516PubMedCrossRef Correa CR, Das IJ, Litt HI et al (2008) Association between tangential beam treatment parameters and cardiac abnormalities after definitive radiation treatment for left-sided breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:508–516PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Correa CR, Litt HI, Hwang W-T et al (2007) Coronary artery findings after left-sided compared with right-sided radiation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:3031–3037PubMedCrossRef Correa CR, Litt HI, Hwang W-T et al (2007) Coronary artery findings after left-sided compared with right-sided radiation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:3031–3037PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidental dose to coronary arteries is higher in prone than in supine whole breast irradiation
A dosimetric comparison in adjuvant radiotherapy of early stage breast cancer
Authors
Florian Würschmidt
Solveigh Stoltenberg
Matthias Kretschmer
Cordula Petersen
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0606-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2014 Go to the issue