Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Original article

Cellular and molecular properties of 90Y-labeled cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy on human tumor cells in vitro

Authors: M. Saki, M. Toulany, W. Sihver, M. Zenker, J.-M. Heldt, B. Mosch, H.-J. Pietzsch, M. Baumann, J. Steinbach, Prof. Dr. H.P. Rodemann

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C225) is used in combination with radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. We investigated whether conjugation of cetuximab with trans-cyclohexyl-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid (CHX-A″-DTPA) and radiolabeling with 90Yttrium affect the molecular and cellular function of cetuximab and improve its combined effect with external-beam irradiation (EBI).

Methods

The following cell lines were used: HNSCC UT5, SAS, FaDu, as well as A43, Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO), and human skin fibroblast HSF7. Binding affinity and kinetics, specificity, retention, and the combination of 90Y-cetuximab with EBI were evaluated.

Results

Control cetuximab and CHX-A″-DTPA-cetuximab blocked the proliferation activity of UT5 cells. In combination with EBI, CHX-A″-DTPA-cetuximab increased the radiosensitivity of UT5 to a similar degree as control cetuximab did. In contrast, in SAS and HSF7 cells neither proliferation nor radiosensitivity was affected by either of the antibodies. Binding [90Y]Y-CHX-A″-DTPA-cetuximab (90Y-cetuximab) to EGFR in HNSCC cells occurred time dependently with a maximum binding at 24 h. Retention of 90Y-cetuximab was similar in both HNSCC cell lines; 24 h after treatment, approximately 90% of bound activity remained in the cell layer. Competition assays, using cell membranes in the absence of an internalized fraction of cetuximab, showed that the cetuximab affinity is not lost as a result of conjugation with CHX-A″-DTPA. Cetuximab and CHX-A″-DTPA-cetuximab blocked EGF-induced Y1068 phosphorylation of EGFR. The lack of an effect of cetuximab on EGF-induced Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and the inhibition of irradiation (IR)-induced Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation by cetuximab were not affected by DTPA conjugation. 90Y-cetuximab in combination with EBI resulted in a pronounced inhibition of colony formation of HNSCC cells.

Conclusions

Conjugation of CHX-A″-DTPA to cetuximab does not alter the cellular and biological function of cetuximab. 90Y-labeling of cetuximab in combination with EBI may improve radiotherapy outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson KA, Brown PH (2010) Drug development for cancer chemoprevention: focus on molecular targets. Semin Oncol 37:345–358PubMedCrossRef Johnson KA, Brown PH (2010) Drug development for cancer chemoprevention: focus on molecular targets. Semin Oncol 37:345–358PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Riesterer O, Mason KA, Raju U et al (2009) Enhanced response to C225 of A431 tumor xenografts growing in irradiated tumor bed. Radiother Oncol 92:383–387PubMedCrossRef Riesterer O, Mason KA, Raju U et al (2009) Enhanced response to C225 of A431 tumor xenografts growing in irradiated tumor bed. Radiother Oncol 92:383–387PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Herbst RS, Shin DM (2002) Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors: a new paradigm for cancer therapy. Cancer 94:1593–1611PubMedCrossRef Herbst RS, Shin DM (2002) Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors: a new paradigm for cancer therapy. Cancer 94:1593–1611PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sunada H, Magun BE, Mendelsohn J, MacLeod CL (1986) Monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor is internalized without stimulating receptor phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:3825–3829PubMedCrossRef Sunada H, Magun BE, Mendelsohn J, MacLeod CL (1986) Monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor is internalized without stimulating receptor phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:3825–3829PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fan Z, Lu Y, Wu X, Mendelsohn J (1994) Antibody-induced epidermal growth factor receptor dimerization mediates inhibition of autocrine proliferation of A431 squamous carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 269:27595–27602PubMed Fan Z, Lu Y, Wu X, Mendelsohn J (1994) Antibody-induced epidermal growth factor receptor dimerization mediates inhibition of autocrine proliferation of A431 squamous carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 269:27595–27602PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gerber DE, Choy H (2010) Cetuximab in combination therapy: from bench to clinic. Cancer Metastasis Rev 29:171–180PubMedCrossRef Gerber DE, Choy H (2010) Cetuximab in combination therapy: from bench to clinic. Cancer Metastasis Rev 29:171–180PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krause M, Gurtner K, Deuse Y, Baumann M (2009) Heterogeneity of tumour response to combined radiotherapy and EGFR inhibitors: differences between antibodies and TK inhibitors. Int J Radiat Biol 85:943–954PubMedCrossRef Krause M, Gurtner K, Deuse Y, Baumann M (2009) Heterogeneity of tumour response to combined radiotherapy and EGFR inhibitors: differences between antibodies and TK inhibitors. Int J Radiat Biol 85:943–954PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gurtner K, Deuse Y, Butof R et al (2011) Diverse effects of combined radiotherapy and EGFR inhibition with antibodies or TK inhibitors on local tumour control and correlation with EGFR gene expression. Radiother Oncol 99:323–330PubMedCrossRef Gurtner K, Deuse Y, Butof R et al (2011) Diverse effects of combined radiotherapy and EGFR inhibition with antibodies or TK inhibitors on local tumour control and correlation with EGFR gene expression. Radiother Oncol 99:323–330PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Curran D, Giralt J, Harari PM et al (2007) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after treatment with high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 25:2191–2197PubMedCrossRef Curran D, Giralt J, Harari PM et al (2007) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after treatment with high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 25:2191–2197PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang N, Erjala K, Kulmala J et al (2009) Concurrent cetuximab, cisplatin, and radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in vitro. Radiother Oncol 92:388–392PubMedCrossRef Zhang N, Erjala K, Kulmala J et al (2009) Concurrent cetuximab, cisplatin, and radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in vitro. Radiother Oncol 92:388–392PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Huang SM, Harari PM (2000) Modulation of radiation response after epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in squamous cell carcinomas: inhibition of damage repair, cell cycle kinetics, and tumor angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 6:2166–2174PubMed Huang SM, Harari PM (2000) Modulation of radiation response after epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in squamous cell carcinomas: inhibition of damage repair, cell cycle kinetics, and tumor angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 6:2166–2174PubMed
14.
go back to reference Dittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP (2005) Inhibition of radiation-induced EGFR nuclear import by C225 (Cetuximab) suppresses DNA-PK activity. Radiother Oncol 76:157–161PubMedCrossRef Dittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP (2005) Inhibition of radiation-induced EGFR nuclear import by C225 (Cetuximab) suppresses DNA-PK activity. Radiother Oncol 76:157–161PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP (2010) Nuclear EGFR as novel therapeutic target: insights into nuclear translocation and function. Strahlenther Onkol 186:1–6PubMedCrossRef Dittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP (2010) Nuclear EGFR as novel therapeutic target: insights into nuclear translocation and function. Strahlenther Onkol 186:1–6PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dittmann K, Mayer C, Fehrenbacher B et al (2005) Radiation-induced epidermal growth factor receptor nuclear import is linked to activation of DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 280:31182–1189PubMedCrossRef Dittmann K, Mayer C, Fehrenbacher B et al (2005) Radiation-induced epidermal growth factor receptor nuclear import is linked to activation of DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 280:31182–1189PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Toulany M, Kasten-Pisula U, Brammer I et al (2006) Blockage of epidermal growth factor receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT signaling increases radiosensitivity of K-RAS mutated human tumor cells in vitro by affecting DNA repair. Clin Cancer Res 12:4119–4126PubMedCrossRef Toulany M, Kasten-Pisula U, Brammer I et al (2006) Blockage of epidermal growth factor receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT signaling increases radiosensitivity of K-RAS mutated human tumor cells in vitro by affecting DNA repair. Clin Cancer Res 12:4119–4126PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kriegs M, Kasten-Pisula U, Rieckmann T et al (2010) The epidermal growth factor receptor modulates DNA double-strand break repair by regulating non-homologous end-joining. DNA Repair (Amst) 9:889–897 Kriegs M, Kasten-Pisula U, Rieckmann T et al (2010) The epidermal growth factor receptor modulates DNA double-strand break repair by regulating non-homologous end-joining. DNA Repair (Amst) 9:889–897
19.
go back to reference Toulany M, Minjgee M, Kehlbach R et al (2010) ErbB2 expression through heterodimerization with erbB1 is necessary for ionizing radiation- but not EGF-induced activation of Akt survival pathway. Radiother Oncol 97:338–345PubMedCrossRef Toulany M, Minjgee M, Kehlbach R et al (2010) ErbB2 expression through heterodimerization with erbB1 is necessary for ionizing radiation- but not EGF-induced activation of Akt survival pathway. Radiother Oncol 97:338–345PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nieder C (2012) RTOG study 0324: Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiation in patients with stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 188:194–195PubMedCrossRef Nieder C (2012) RTOG study 0324: Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiation in patients with stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 188:194–195PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Alongi F, Bignardi M, Garassino I et al (2012) Prospective phase II trial of cetuximab plus VMAT-SIB in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Feasibility and tolerability in elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible patients. Strahlenther Onkol 188:49–55PubMedCrossRef Alongi F, Bignardi M, Garassino I et al (2012) Prospective phase II trial of cetuximab plus VMAT-SIB in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Feasibility and tolerability in elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible patients. Strahlenther Onkol 188:49–55PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Selzer E, Liederer S, Lemaire C et al (2011) Incidence of dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy and cetuximab. Strahlenther Onkol 187:373–377PubMedCrossRef Selzer E, Liederer S, Lemaire C et al (2011) Incidence of dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy and cetuximab. Strahlenther Onkol 187:373–377PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Niyazi M, Siefert A, Schwarz SB et al (2011) Therapeutic options for recurrent malignant glioma. Radiother Oncol 98:1–14PubMedCrossRef Niyazi M, Siefert A, Schwarz SB et al (2011) Therapeutic options for recurrent malignant glioma. Radiother Oncol 98:1–14PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liu Z, Liu Y, Jia B et al (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted radioimmunotherapy of human head and neck cancer xenografts using 90Y-labeled fully human antibody panitumumab. Mol Cancer Ther 9:2297–2308PubMedCrossRef Liu Z, Liu Y, Jia B et al (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted radioimmunotherapy of human head and neck cancer xenografts using 90Y-labeled fully human antibody panitumumab. Mol Cancer Ther 9:2297–2308PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gemmete JJ, Mukherji SK (2011) Panitumumab (Vectibix). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Gemmete JJ, Mukherji SK (2011) Panitumumab (Vectibix). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
26.
go back to reference Rades D, Wolff C, Nadrowitz R et al (2009) Radioactive EGFR antibody cetuximab in multimodal cancer treatment: stability and synergistic effects with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:1226–1231PubMedCrossRef Rades D, Wolff C, Nadrowitz R et al (2009) Radioactive EGFR antibody cetuximab in multimodal cancer treatment: stability and synergistic effects with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:1226–1231PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rades D, Nadrowitz R, Buchmann I et al (2010) Radiolabeled cetuximab plus whole-brain irradiation (WBI) for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Strahlenther Onkol 186:458–462PubMedCrossRef Rades D, Nadrowitz R, Buchmann I et al (2010) Radiolabeled cetuximab plus whole-brain irradiation (WBI) for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Strahlenther Onkol 186:458–462PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wheeler DL, Dunn EF, Harari PM (2010) Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:493–507PubMedCrossRef Wheeler DL, Dunn EF, Harari PM (2010) Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:493–507PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Toulany M, Dittmann K, Baumann M, Rodemann HP (2005) Radiosensitization of Ras-mutated human tumor cells in vitro by the specific EGF receptor antagonist BIBX1382BS. Radiother Oncol 74:117–129PubMedCrossRef Toulany M, Dittmann K, Baumann M, Rodemann HP (2005) Radiosensitization of Ras-mutated human tumor cells in vitro by the specific EGF receptor antagonist BIBX1382BS. Radiother Oncol 74:117–129PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Debucquoy A, Machiels JP, McBride WH, Haustermans K (2010) Integration of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with preoperative chemoradiation. Clin Cancer Res 16:2709–2714PubMedCrossRef Debucquoy A, Machiels JP, McBride WH, Haustermans K (2010) Integration of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors with preoperative chemoradiation. Clin Cancer Res 16:2709–2714PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rodemann HP, Dittmann K, Toulany M (2007) Radiation-induced EGFR-signaling and control of DNA-damage repair. Int J Radiat Biol 83:781–791PubMedCrossRef Rodemann HP, Dittmann K, Toulany M (2007) Radiation-induced EGFR-signaling and control of DNA-damage repair. Int J Radiat Biol 83:781–791PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Meyn RE, Munshi A, Haymach JV et al (2009) Receptor signaling as a regulatory mechanism of DNA repair. Radiother Oncol 92:316–322PubMedCrossRef Meyn RE, Munshi A, Haymach JV et al (2009) Receptor signaling as a regulatory mechanism of DNA repair. Radiother Oncol 92:316–322PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wang M, Morsbach F, Sander D et al (2011) EGF receptor inhibition radiosensitizes NSCLC cells by inducing senescence in cells sustaining DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res 71:6261–6269PubMedCrossRef Wang M, Morsbach F, Sander D et al (2011) EGF receptor inhibition radiosensitizes NSCLC cells by inducing senescence in cells sustaining DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res 71:6261–6269PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Yang ES, Trummell HQ et al (2011) Inhibition of STAT-3 results in greater cetuximab sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 99:339–343PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Yang ES, Trummell HQ et al (2011) Inhibition of STAT-3 results in greater cetuximab sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 99:339–343PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Milenic DE, Wong KJ, Baidoo KE et al (2008) Cetuximab: preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR for radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic applications. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 23:619–631PubMedCrossRef Milenic DE, Wong KJ, Baidoo KE et al (2008) Cetuximab: preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR for radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic applications. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 23:619–631PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Aerts HJ, Dubois L, Perk L et al (2009) Disparity between in vivo EGFR expression and 89Zr-labeled cetuximab uptake assessed with PET. J Nucl Med 50:123–131PubMedCrossRef Aerts HJ, Dubois L, Perk L et al (2009) Disparity between in vivo EGFR expression and 89Zr-labeled cetuximab uptake assessed with PET. J Nucl Med 50:123–131PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Liao HJ, Carpenter G (2009) Cetuximab/C225-induced intracellular trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 69:6179–6183PubMedCrossRef Liao HJ, Carpenter G (2009) Cetuximab/C225-induced intracellular trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 69:6179–6183PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Jaramillo ML, Leon Z, Grothe S et al (2006) Effect of the anti-receptor ligand-blocking 225 monoclonal antibody on EGF receptor endocytosis and sorting. Exp Cell Res 312:2778–2790PubMedCrossRef Jaramillo ML, Leon Z, Grothe S et al (2006) Effect of the anti-receptor ligand-blocking 225 monoclonal antibody on EGF receptor endocytosis and sorting. Exp Cell Res 312:2778–2790PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Eiblmaier M, Meyer LA, Watson MA et al (2008) Correlating EGFR expression with receptor-binding properties and internalization of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab in 5 cervical cancer cell lines. J Nucl Med 49:1472–1479PubMedCrossRef Eiblmaier M, Meyer LA, Watson MA et al (2008) Correlating EGFR expression with receptor-binding properties and internalization of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab in 5 cervical cancer cell lines. J Nucl Med 49:1472–1479PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Nordberg E, Friedman M, Gostring L et al (2007) Cellular studies of binding, internalization and retention of a radiolabeled EGFR-binding affibody molecule. Nucl Med Biol 34:609–618PubMedCrossRef Nordberg E, Friedman M, Gostring L et al (2007) Cellular studies of binding, internalization and retention of a radiolabeled EGFR-binding affibody molecule. Nucl Med Biol 34:609–618PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gostring L, Chew MT, Orlova A et al (2010) Quantification of internalization of EGFR-binding Affibody molecules: Methodological aspects. Int J Oncol 36:757–763PubMedCrossRef Gostring L, Chew MT, Orlova A et al (2010) Quantification of internalization of EGFR-binding Affibody molecules: Methodological aspects. Int J Oncol 36:757–763PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Koi L, Bruechner K, Helbig L et al (2011) Combination of external and internal irradiation using radionuclide-labelled Cetuximab in FaDu human squamous cell carcinomas xenografted in nude mice. Wolsberg meeting series 9:60 Koi L, Bruechner K, Helbig L et al (2011) Combination of external and internal irradiation using radionuclide-labelled Cetuximab in FaDu human squamous cell carcinomas xenografted in nude mice. Wolsberg meeting series 9:60
43.
go back to reference Eke I, Cordes N (2011) Dual targeting of EGFR and focal adhesion kinase in 3D grown HNSCC cell cultures. Radiother Oncol 99:279–286PubMedCrossRef Eke I, Cordes N (2011) Dual targeting of EGFR and focal adhesion kinase in 3D grown HNSCC cell cultures. Radiother Oncol 99:279–286PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Berger C, Krengel U, Stang E et al (2011) Nimotuzumab and cetuximab block ligand-independent EGF receptor signaling efficiently at different concentrations. J Immunother 34:550–555PubMedCrossRef Berger C, Krengel U, Stang E et al (2011) Nimotuzumab and cetuximab block ligand-independent EGF receptor signaling efficiently at different concentrations. J Immunother 34:550–555PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Yoshida T, Okamoto I, Okabe T et al (2008) Matuzumab and cetuximab activate the epidermal growth factor receptor but fail to trigger downstream signaling by Akt or Erk. Int J Cancer 122:1530–1538PubMedCrossRef Yoshida T, Okamoto I, Okabe T et al (2008) Matuzumab and cetuximab activate the epidermal growth factor receptor but fail to trigger downstream signaling by Akt or Erk. Int J Cancer 122:1530–1538PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Li S, Schmitz KR, Jeffrey PD et al (2005) Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab. Cancer Cell 7:301–311PubMedCrossRef Li S, Schmitz KR, Jeffrey PD et al (2005) Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab. Cancer Cell 7:301–311PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Patel D, Bassi R, Hooper A et al (2009) Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab inhibits EGFR/HER-2 heterodimerization and activation. Int J Oncol 34:25–32PubMed Patel D, Bassi R, Hooper A et al (2009) Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab inhibits EGFR/HER-2 heterodimerization and activation. Int J Oncol 34:25–32PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cellular and molecular properties of 90Y-labeled cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy on human tumor cells in vitro
Authors
M. Saki
M. Toulany
W. Sihver
M. Zenker
J.-M. Heldt
B. Mosch
H.-J. Pietzsch
M. Baumann
J. Steinbach
Prof. Dr. H.P. Rodemann
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0121-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 9/2012 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften

Mitteilungen