Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original article

Prospective phase II trial of cetuximab plus VMAT-SIB in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Feasibility and tolerability in elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible patients

Authors: F. Alongi, Dr., M. Bignardi, I. Garassino, S. Pentimalli, R. Cavina, P. Mancosu, G. Reggiori, A. Poletti, D. Ferrari, P. Foa, A. Bigoni, A. Dragonetti, P. Salvatori, O. Spahiu, A. Fogliata, L. Cozzi, A. Santoro, M. Scorsetti

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Cetuximab plus radiotherapy (RT) may be an effective alternative to chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LASCCHN) patients. We analyzed a group of patients treated at our institute with cetuximab plus volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT) with the RapidArc technique in a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) regime. The primary end point was the assessment of acute toxicity and the feasibility of the combined approach.

Materials and methods

Between December 2008 and March 2010, 22 patients were submitted to IMRT-SIB plus cetuximab for radical intent in case of LASCCHN. None of the patients was suitable for chemotherapy because of important comorbidities (the majority suffered of heart chronic diseases). All patients underwent planning CT (additional image modalities were acquired for contouring purposes in the same treatment position: MRI in 12 and FDG-PET in 4 out of 22 patients). VMAT, by means of RapidArc, and SIB with two dose levels of 54.45 Gy and 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions were adopted. All patients included in the analysis were concomitantly treated with cetuximab: administration of the drug was initiated 1 week before RT at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 body surface area over a period of 120 min, follow by a weekly 60 min infusion of 250 mg/m2 for the duration of RT. Patients were assessed for toxicities according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria.

Results

All but 2 patients completed treatment and achieved the minimum follow-up of 12 months after the end of the treatment. Of the 22 patients, 18% (4 patients) showed grade 1, 36% (8 patients) grade 2, and 36% (8 patients) showed grade 3 dermatitis, while 9% (2 patients) had grade 1, 36% (8 patients) grade 2, and 45% (10 patients) had grade 3 mucositis/stomatitis. No grade 4 toxicities were recorded. Considering blood parameters, 3 cases of grade 1 anemia and 1 case of grade 2 thrombocytopenia were observed. Nobody required feeding tube placement during treatment.

Conclusion

The here reported toxicity data are promising and encouraging in regard to the adoption of moderate hypofractionation with VMAT-SIB techniques, when cetuximab is concomitantly administered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A et al (2004) Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:617–624PubMedCrossRef Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A et al (2004) Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:617–624PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Staffurth J, Radiotherapy Development Board (2010) A review of the clinical evidence for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 22:643–657 Staffurth J, Radiotherapy Development Board (2010) A review of the clinical evidence for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 22:643–657
4.
go back to reference Withers HR, Thames HD (1988) Dose fractionation and volume effects in normal tissues and tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 11:313–329PubMedCrossRef Withers HR, Thames HD (1988) Dose fractionation and volume effects in normal tissues and tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 11:313–329PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Verbakel W, Cuijpers J, Hoffmans D et al (2009) Volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy versus conventional IMRT in head and neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:252–259PubMedCrossRef Verbakel W, Cuijpers J, Hoffmans D et al (2009) Volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy versus conventional IMRT in head and neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:252–259PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol 92:111–117PubMedCrossRef Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol 92:111–117PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Doornaert P, Verbakel W, Bieker M et al (2011) RapidArc planning and delivery in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:429–435PubMedCrossRef Doornaert P, Verbakel W, Bieker M et al (2011) RapidArc planning and delivery in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:429–435PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Scorsetti M, Fogliata A, Castiglioni S et al (2010) Early clinical experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 5:93PubMedCrossRef Scorsetti M, Fogliata A, Castiglioni S et al (2010) Early clinical experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 5:93PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grandis JR, Melhem MF, Barnes EL, Tweardy DJ (1996) Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 78:1284–1292CrossRef Grandis JR, Melhem MF, Barnes EL, Tweardy DJ (1996) Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 78:1284–1292CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kimura H, Sakai K, Arao T et al (2007) Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci 98:1275–1280PubMedCrossRef Kimura H, Sakai K, Arao T et al (2007) Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci 98:1275–1280PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Licitra L, Bergamini C, Mirabile A, Granata R (2011) Targeted therapy in head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19:132–137PubMedCrossRef Licitra L, Bergamini C, Mirabile A, Granata R (2011) Targeted therapy in head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19:132–137PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Robert F, Ezekiel MP, Spencer SA et al (2001) Phase I study of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab in combination with radiation therapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3234–3243PubMed Robert F, Ezekiel MP, Spencer SA et al (2001) Phase I study of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab in combination with radiation therapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3234–3243PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pignon JP, Maître A le, Bourhis J, MACH-NC Collaborative Group (2007) Meta-analyses of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:112–114CrossRef Pignon JP, Maître A le, Bourhis J, MACH-NC Collaborative Group (2007) Meta-analyses of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:112–114CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Caudell JJ, Sawrie SM, Spencer SA et al (2008) Locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with primary radiotherapy: a comparison of the addition of cetuximab or chemotherapy and the impact of protocol treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:676–681PubMedCrossRef Caudell JJ, Sawrie SM, Spencer SA et al (2008) Locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with primary radiotherapy: a comparison of the addition of cetuximab or chemotherapy and the impact of protocol treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:676–681PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jensen AD, Bergmann ZP, Garcia-Huttenlocher H et al (2010) Cetuximab and radiation for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the elderly and multi-morbid patient: a single-centre experience. Head Neck Oncol 2:34PubMedCrossRef Jensen AD, Bergmann ZP, Garcia-Huttenlocher H et al (2010) Cetuximab and radiation for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the elderly and multi-morbid patient: a single-centre experience. Head Neck Oncol 2:34PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bernier J, Schneider D (2007) Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy: an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck? Eur J Cancer 43:35–45PubMedCrossRef Bernier J, Schneider D (2007) Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy: an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck? Eur J Cancer 43:35–45PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Curran D, Giralt J, Harari PM et al (2007) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after treatment with high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 25:2191–2197PubMedCrossRef Curran D, Giralt J, Harari PM et al (2007) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after treatment with high-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 25:2191–2197PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pignon JP, Maître A le, Maillard E et al (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14PubMedCrossRef Pignon JP, Maître A le, Maillard E et al (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berger B, Belka C (2008) Severe skin reaction secondary to concomitant radiotherapy plus cetuximab. Radiat Oncol J 3:5CrossRef Berger B, Belka C (2008) Severe skin reaction secondary to concomitant radiotherapy plus cetuximab. Radiat Oncol J 3:5CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sanguineti G, Endres EJ, Gunn BG, Parker B (2006) Is there a “mucosa-sparing” benefit of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:931–938PubMedCrossRef Sanguineti G, Endres EJ, Gunn BG, Parker B (2006) Is there a “mucosa-sparing” benefit of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:931–938PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mendenhall WM, Riggs CE, Vaysberg M et al (2010) Altered fractionation and adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 32:939–945PubMedCrossRef Mendenhall WM, Riggs CE, Vaysberg M et al (2010) Altered fractionation and adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 32:939–945PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Montejo ME, Shrieve DC, Bentz BG et al (2010) IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (Epub ahead of print) Montejo ME, Shrieve DC, Bentz BG et al (2010) IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (Epub ahead of print)
24.
go back to reference Eppinga W, Lagerwaard F, Verbakel W et al (2010) Volumetric modulated arc therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 186:382–387PubMedCrossRef Eppinga W, Lagerwaard F, Verbakel W et al (2010) Volumetric modulated arc therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 186:382–387PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Scorsetti M, Mancosu P, Navarria P et al (2011) Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for adrenal metastases. A feasibility study of advanced techniques with modulated photons and protons. Strahlenther Onkol 187:238–244PubMedCrossRef Scorsetti M, Mancosu P, Navarria P et al (2011) Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for adrenal metastases. A feasibility study of advanced techniques with modulated photons and protons. Strahlenther Onkol 187:238–244PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jacob V, Bayer W, Astner S, Kneschaurek P (2010) A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 186:502–510PubMedCrossRef Jacob V, Bayer W, Astner S, Kneschaurek P (2010) A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 186:502–510PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Peponi E, Glanzmann C, Kunz G et al (2010) Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 186:135–142PubMedCrossRef Peponi E, Glanzmann C, Kunz G et al (2010) Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 186:135–142PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Semrau S, Waldfahrer F, Lell M et al (2011) Feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of short induction chemotherapy of docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradio-therapy for organ preservation in advanced cancer of the hypopharynx, larynx, and base of tongue. Early results. Strahlenther Onkol 187:15–22PubMedCrossRef Semrau S, Waldfahrer F, Lell M et al (2011) Feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of short induction chemotherapy of docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradio-therapy for organ preservation in advanced cancer of the hypopharynx, larynx, and base of tongue. Early results. Strahlenther Onkol 187:15–22PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Studer G, Brown M, Salgueiro EB et al (in press) Grade 3/4 dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent cetuximab and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:110–107 Studer G, Brown M, Salgueiro EB et al (in press) Grade 3/4 dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent cetuximab and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:110–107
30.
go back to reference Goon PK, Stanley MA, Ebmeyer J et al (2009) HPV & head and neck cancer: a descriptive update. Head Neck Oncol 1:36PubMedCrossRef Goon PK, Stanley MA, Ebmeyer J et al (2009) HPV & head and neck cancer: a descriptive update. Head Neck Oncol 1:36PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective phase II trial of cetuximab plus VMAT-SIB in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Feasibility and tolerability in elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible patients
Authors
F. Alongi, Dr.
M. Bignardi
I. Garassino
S. Pentimalli
R. Cavina
P. Mancosu
G. Reggiori
A. Poletti
D. Ferrari
P. Foa
A. Bigoni
A. Dragonetti
P. Salvatori
O. Spahiu
A. Fogliata
L. Cozzi
A. Santoro
M. Scorsetti
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Urban and Vogel
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-011-0006-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 1/2012 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften

Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften