Top

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Open Access 26-01-2024 | Aligner | Original Article

Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners

Authors: Mr. Lukas Camenisch, Dr. Georgios Polychronis, Mr. Nearchos Panayi, Ms. Olga Makou, PD Dr. Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, Prof. Spiros Zinelis, Prof. Dr. Theodore Eliades

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess differences in the fundamental mechanical properties of resin-made three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic aligners according to the printing orientation.

Methods

Twenty resin 3D-printed dumbbell-shaped specimens and 20 orthodontic aligners were fabricated and postcured in nitrogen. Half of the specimens and aligners were built in horizontal (H), the other half in vertical (V) directions. The dumbbell-shaped specimens were loaded in a tensile testing machine, while parts of the aligners were embedded in acrylic resin, ground, polished, and then underwent instrumented indentation testing (IIT). Mechanical properties that were assessed included the yield strength (YS), breaking strength (BS), plastic strain (ε), Martens hardness (HM), indentation modulus (E_IT), elastic index (η_IT), and indentation relaxation (R_IT). Data were analyzed statistically with independent t‑tests or Mann–Whitney tests at α = 5%.

Results

No significant differences were found between specimens or aligners printed either in a horizontal or a vertical direction (P > 0.05 in all instances). Overall, the 3D-printed aligners showed acceptable mechanical propertied in terms of YS (mean 19.2 MPa; standard deviation [SD] 1.7 MPa), BS (mean 19.6 MPa; SD 1.2 MPa), ε (mean 77%; SD 11%), HM (median 89.0 N/mm²; interquartile range [IQR] 84.5–90.0 NN/m²), E_IT (median 2670.5 MPa; IQR 2645.0–2726.0 MPa), η_IT (median 27.5%; IQR 25.9–28.1%), and R_IT (mean 65.1%; SD 3.5%).

Conclusion

Printing direction seemed to have no effect on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin aligners, which are promising for orthodontic use.

Alexandropoulos A, Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Eliades T (2015) Chemical and mechanical characteristics of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials. Aust Orthod J 31:165–170. https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-151CrossRefPubMed

Camenisch L, Polychronis G, Panayi N, Makou O, Papageorgiou SN, Zinelis S, Eliades T (2023) The effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of rinted orthodontic aligners [Data set]. Zenodo, p 3D https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7896777

Can E, Panayi N, Polychronis G, Papageorgiou SN, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Eliades T (2022) In-house 3D-printed aligners: effect of in vivo ageing on mechanical properties. Eur J Orthod 44:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab022CrossRefPubMed

Chen S, Gao H, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Gao Z, Zhou X (2022) Review on residual stresses in metal additive manufacturing: formation mechanisms, parameter dependencies, prediction and control approaches. J Mater Res Technol 17:2950–2974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.054CrossRef

Dalaie K, Fatemi SM, Ghaffari S (2021) Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of clear aligners after thermoforming and aging. Prog Orthod 22:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00362-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fang D, Zhang N, Chen H, Bai Y (2013) Dynamic stress relaxation of orthodontic thermoplastic materials in a simulated oral environment. Dent Mater J 32:946–951. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-131CrossRefPubMed

Fedorenko A, Fedulov B, Kuzminova Y, Evlashin S, Staroverov O, Tretyakov M, Lomakin E, Akhatov I (2021) Anisotropy of mechanical properties and residual stress in additively manufactured 316l specimens. materials 14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237176CrossRef

Bradley GT, Teske L, Eliades G, Zinelis S, Eliades T (2016) Do the mechanical and chemical properties of InvisalignTM appliances change after use? A retrieval analysis. Eur J Orthod 38:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv003CrossRef

Iliadi A, Koletsi D, Eliades T (2019) Forces and moments generated by aligner-type appliances for orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 22:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12333CrossRefPubMed

10.

Jaggy F, Zinelis S, Polychronis G, Patcas R, Schätzle M, Eliades G, Eliades T (2020) ATR-FTIR analysis and one-week stress relaxation of four orthodontic aligner materials. materials 13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA13081868CrossRef

11.

Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena FL, Bajaj D, Breedon P (2019) Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 156:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kohda N, Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA, Ahluwalia KS, Mizoguchi I (2013) Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliances. Angle Orthod 83:476–483. https://doi.org/10.2319/052512-432.1CrossRefPubMed

13.

Levrini L, Novara F, Margherini S, Tenconi C, Raspanti M (2015) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the growth of dental plaque on the surfaces of removable orthodontic aligners after the use of different cleaning methods. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 7:125–131. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S95814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Li C, Liu ZY, Fang XY, Guo YB (2018) Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 71:348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039CrossRef

15.

Liu CL, Sun WT, Liao W, Lu WX, Li QW, Jeong Y, Liu J, Zhao ZH (2016) Colour stabilities of three types of orthodontic clear aligners exposed to staining agents. Int J Oral Sci 8:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2016.25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Liu H, Yang N, Sun Y, Yang L, Li N (2019) Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical behaviour of polymers by stereolithography. Iop Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/612/3/032166CrossRef

17.

Lombardo L, Martines E, Mazzanti V, Arreghini A, Mollica F, Siciliani G (2017) Stress relaxation properties of four orthodontic aligner materials: A 24-hour in vitro study. Angle Orthod 87:11–18. https://doi.org/10.2319/113015-813.1CrossRefPubMed

18.

McCarty MC, Chen SJ, English JD, Kasper F (2020) Effect of print orientation and duration of ultraviolet curing on the dimensional accuracy of a 3-dimensionally printed orthodontic clear aligner design. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158:889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.023CrossRefPubMed

19.

Nakano H, Kato R, Kakami C, Okamoto H, Mamada K, Maki K (2019) Development of biocompatible resins for 3D printing of direct aligners. J Photopolym Sci Technol 32:209–216. https://doi.org/10.2494/photopolymer.32.209CrossRef

20.

Papadopoulou AK, Cantele A, Polychronis G, Zinelis S, Eliades T (2019) Changes in roughness and mechanical properties of Invisalign® appliances after one- and two-weeks use. materials 12:2406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152406CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Peltomaki T, Eliades T (2020) Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Eur J Orthod 42:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz094CrossRefPubMed

22.

Perea-Lowery L, Gibreel M, Vallittu PK, Lassila L (2021) Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 115:104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104254CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pomes B, Derue I, Lucas A, Nguyen JF, Richaud E (2018) Water ageing of urethane dimethacrylate networks. Polym Degrad Stab 154:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.06.003CrossRef

24.

Puebla K, Arcaute K, Quintana R, Wicker RB (2012) Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type i specimens manufactured via stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 18:374–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211250373CrossRef

25.

Quintana R, Choi JW, Puebla K, Wicker R (2010) Effects of build orientation on tensile strength for stereolithography-manufactured ASTM D‑638 type i specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2066-zCrossRef

26.

Schümann K, Röhr U, Schmitz KP, Grabow N (2016) Conversion of engineering stresses to Cauchy stresses in tensile and compression tests of thermoplastic polymers. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2:649–652. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2016-0142CrossRef

27.

Shanmugasundaram SA, Razmi J, Mian MJ, Ladani L (2020) Mechanical anisotropy and surface roughness in additively manufactured parts fabricated by stereolithography (SLA) using statistical analysis. materials 13:2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112496CrossRef

28.

Tamburrino F, D’Antò V, Bucci R, Alessandri-Bonetti G, Barone S, Razionale AV (2020) Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polymers for aligner manufacturing: In vitro study. Dent J 8:47. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020047CrossRef

29.

Tartaglia GM, Mapelli A, Maspero C, Santaniello T, Serafin M, Farronato M, Caprioglio A (2021) Direct 3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: Current state and future possibilities. materials 14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071799CrossRef

30.

VanLandingham MR (2003) Review of Instrumented Indentation. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 108:249–265. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.108.024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Xie D, Lv F, Yang Y, Shen L, Tian Z, Shuai C, Chen B, Zhao J (2022) A Review on Distortion and Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing. Chin J Mech Eng Addit Manuf Front 1:100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100039CrossRef

32.

Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA (2009) Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac 136(150):e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.026CrossRef

33.

Zinelis S, Panayi N, Polychronis G, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T (2022) Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers. Orthod Craniofac Res 25:336–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12537CrossRefPubMed

Title: Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners
Authors: Mr. Lukas Camenisch
Dr. Georgios Polychronis
Mr. Nearchos Panayi
Ms. Olga Makou
PD Dr. Spyridon N. Papageorgiou
Prof. Spiros Zinelis
Prof. Dr. Theodore Eliades
Publication date: 26-01-2024
Publisher: Springer Medizin
Keyword: Aligner
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00511-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content